*teleports on your roof*

>*teleports on your roof*

Attached: dishonored.jpg (1600x650, 215.67K)

>nothin personal kid

must have been a rat

>*knocks you out unconscious at the party and takes you to your stalking pervert*

that can't be good

He doesn't actually teleport. He just moves at small high speed bursts.

een hans dyes

How old did you say your sister was?

You wanna bet on the hounds again?

2>DotO>1

Blow off, choffer.

Only nonlethal method I disliked. All the others guaranteed the target would disappear, be exiled, jailed, etc.
This one is just "I'll take her away from here and she definitely will be okay with this!"
Like, what if she wakes up, strangles the simp in his sleep and just comes right back?

Objective shit taste
1>2>DotO

>Hey Raphael, nice game you made there
>Mind if I milk it into a franchise and crash and burn after two games?
>Wait why are you leaving?

Attached: 1601387878458.jpg (1280x720, 71.01K)

2 and DotO have the best level design in the series, which is the most important aspect of an immersive sim.

Don't worry, it was retconned and the stalker became her slave instead.

I can't refute that, but even so...

Dishonored 1 was shit. The entire game could be beaten by spamming the plunging attack on the hardest difficulty.

Tried 2 on the gamepass and it was the same shit.

>minecraft is shit, the entire game could be beaten by going in creative mode

heard you got killed at cards last night.

Love me some Dishonored. I can easily afford to get the sequel but I'm still waiting for a sale just because. How does it compare? What about Arkane's others like Prey? Is Thief even worth one playthrough doing the bare minimum?

Except they don't? Bigger/more complex =/= better, its why open world games tend to be listless and boring. I spent a quarter of my time in D2 just swiveling around trying to figure out where the fuck they had put 'paths' designed to lead me to objectives, and half the time it felt like I was cheesing it instead of actually pulling off a quiet infiltration.
Also
>immersive sim
opinion discarded. Stupidest 'genre' I've heard people labeling games as in the last decade.

> Daud is now asexual
> Bisexual Billie pushed heavily

100% chance Harvey Smith is a sex pest

?

Its decent. If you liked D1 its worth a playthrough, but honestly it doesn't feel like it has the same sort of passion that made the first one so great.
Plot is basically a carbon copy of the first game as well, with new faces and a couple older ones

beat it recently and it was an alright game, killed samuel for trying to snitch on me.

>except they don't?
You type like a basic bitch. I never said they were better because they're bigger, they have more player freedom and the first game's levels are objectively more linear with less freedom. Just because you lack situational awareness and critical thinking doesn't mean it's the level's fault. Whether you like it or not, "immersive sims" imply a certain design goal and vision that properly differentiates those games from other First Person games. It's like 4X with strategy games.

Let's gather for whiskey and cigars.

>Bigger/more complex =/= better
literally the exact opposite in the case of immersive sims, to a degree

JUST

Attached: 1587630350023.jpg (1288x966, 82.52K)

>TrannyDestroyer
BASED