why is this game so fucking bad holy shit this is horrific. i've made bowls of fucking cereal more complex than this mess. i'd rather shit in my hands and clap than play more of this
Why is this game so fucking bad holy shit this is horrific...
>still seething
k keep me posted
>why is this game so fucking bad holy shit this is horrific. i've made bowls of fucking cereal more complex than this mess. i'd rather shit in my hands and clap than play more of this
you should be aware that the only people who like fo3 are people nostalgic for it, people who were around 12 when it came out
everyone told me it was good, that it was so much better than 4. well no, atleast 4 had gameplay, 3 has bad writing AND bad gameplay.
Pretty much this. F3 was the tlou2 of that era.
stop listening to Zig Forums and younglings
are the first 2 good? downloading patches for f1 rn
they are great if you are into that kind of games, me i prefer something with a little more focus on combat like underrail
Every Bethesda game is complete garbage and it genuinely saddens me that their games are so famous and well liked
seethe
both are fucking trash just like every other game bethesda ever released, morrowing included
Literally playing through this for the first (sort of) time and it's great. Really gives me those Oblivion exploration vibes, and once you get over that it's not really a shooter the vats combat is great. I would be interested if OP could elaborate why he thinks the writing is bad.
All morals are so black and white. There's barely any characters that you have to stop and think about. It's just "oh, he's the bad guy, sure."
I wouldn't say it's horrific and I still enjoyed it but it's honestly worse than 4. 4 at least had gameplay, well written companions, and the idea behind synths while not properly executed was still rather interesting. 3 on the other hand had better side quests and a better leveling system. That's it.
It was good for the time. You're just spoiled.
It came out more than 10 years ago and blew away most people.
wait untill you see fallout 4
I was 15 when it came out, played it and enjoyed it. But after NV, I cant really go back.
>It was good for the time
No it wasn't
FC2 was there if you wanted open world shooting, and a plethora of RPGs were there if you wanted good roleplaying
Did you get past the tutorial?
yeah
Why do I have to walk around all those subways just to go from one place to the other? Is it to hide the loading times?
>play two or more separate games to get the amount of content of a single game
it was.
bruh
I don't believe you. One of the first main quests has you resolving a disagreement between a pimp and former hooker who was stealing from him, and both are awful people where there are no "good" solutions.
It's for performance reasons. Gamebryo couldn't handle a big city area on consoles so they had to divide it into sections accessible by subway tunnels. Sort of like how the New Vegas strip couldn't be an open area on consoles so they divided it into sections.
It’s a good open world sandbox game. One of the best on the market even to this day in fact.
It baffles me how one game can make Zig Forums seethe so much.
More or less. Primarily it was because gamebryo would need huge amount of ram to load in the asssets of multiple cells, which consoles and then current PCs simply didn't have.
if a game can make Zig Forums seethe over 12 years later, that must mean it's special desu ne
fallout new vegas came out 2 years later and is so much better.
I like the map and the atmosphere but it's pretty tough to defend much else in that game. Still enjoyed but that also probably has a lot to do with patches and mods.
>>It’s a good open world sandbox game. One of the best on the market even to this day in fact.
its not even the best open world "sandbox" to come out that year lmao
I know it was a metaphor but I any to hear about these complex bowls of cereal. Are talking a mix of Cap N Crunch and Lucky Charms?