Is there a single fucking reviewer that shit all over cyberpunk?

Is there a single fucking reviewer that shit all over cyberpunk?
Every single one I've seen is just talking about how amazing it is.

Attached: file.png (1920x1080, 3.01M)

Other urls found in this thread:

metacritic.com/game/pc/cyberpunk-2077
metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/cyberpunk-2077
metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/cyberpunk-2077
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Why would they when it would garner the support of 2% of Cyberpunk's playerbase and cause the other 98% to go into retard rage

All reviewers played on PC and on PC it is truly a 10/10 game.

its a good game if you have a really good pc with something like rtx 3080 obviously there are still plenty of bugs but still very immersive and enjoyable.

The industry promotes every big release so financial damage is kept to a minimum.
It's a simple subversion that does wonders for sales, even today there are people looking at the good reviews and purchasing the product.
We make multiple outlets reinforce confusing opinions player reviews to foster a bias that will ignore said reviews in favor of our paid reviewers.
For the uninformed, the game is a masterpiece, and a must buy.

I can’t even get a 3070 bro and it’s not because of money

It's an objectively 4/10 game on PC and 1/10 on consoles

does it warrant being shit on?

You're poor, aren't you? Or you're one of those retards that spent 2000$ on a PC and filled it with malware and garbage and now wonders why games don't run great on it? Or simply a copink consoletard? Which one is it?

It's pretty amazing on PC. And the review copy everyone got was on PC.

Holy shit, didn't know having a better rig adds more meaningful dialogue options
Buying a 3090 right now, thanks mate

They are bad reviews but....its not about gameplay and more about offending trannies

Do you retards actually believe this? Or just spam it because every other 12 year old is?

This game actually showed up, again, how reviewers don't care about bugs and glitches, and this is a BAD thing for the industry.

It’s Bioshock infinite all over again. People are still blinded by the hype and it will be a few years before people realize even with all the bugs patched it’s still a mediocre game

Like yeah wtf is happening with journous? They are either praising it with an empty review or shitting on it but not for technical reasons.

>2020
>honest gamejourno
lol

they've always been like this

This. It's like expecting two rabbits to fuck and lay actual golden eggs. Journos will praise Cyberpunk because they're literally shilling it. You don't get paid for bashing a game.

You fucking retard. Getting the 3000 series does not improve a pile of garbage. It turns that pile of garbage into 4k resolution pile of garbage. You still have the same shitty game, with the same shitty mechanics, the same shitty dialog options and the same shitty AI. It does not look and feel like a 2020 game which was in development for 9 fucking years. Look at RDR2, which was in development for 7years and it turned out to be a masterpiece, with no source of inspiration. Cyberpunk however, has plenty of source and still sucks ass. Id rather play deus ex

I play on PC and it really is amazing, for me it's better than Witcher 3 so far

Because they played on PC where it's at least playable and as a game it's fine. It falls apart real fast if you start lumping in bugs as parts of the game itself and not bugs.

>listening to journos
>ever
If you need people to feel valided in your taste, you must me one insecure fag

GTA runs perfect on everything and is more fun to boot. Cope.

>For the uninformed, the game is a masterpiece, and a must buy.
This. The game is not utter trash. It's like 6/10 maybe 7 if you are lucky and don't experience many bugs. But for the masses it's THE NEW SHIT to buy and talk about.
Fuck, even the generic mainstream media in my eastern european country write about this "masterpiece" altough they never ever write about videogames otherwise.

ive heard from people who play on PC that its a good game, but they say there are "definitely bugs" but overall they say its good.

I dunno about console or if you have a trash tier PC

Can someone explain how this game benefits from being a massive open world at all? It's such a meandering fucking mess of shit. Every "gig" and "side job" I've done has been an absolute fucking waste of my life. I thought this was supposed to be similar to games like Deus Ex and Masquerade Bloodlines, it's just the same pointless ubisoft/gta shit with a first person perspective.

>immersive
>NPC AI is braindead
>Shitty animations
>Shitty physics
>No sense of progression(no apartment changes, can't see your collection of cars, can't see V change as he gets more body modifications, the world doesn't change with your actions)
>RPG has 2 dialogue options
>Soulless world if you don't do missions
>Can't even buy food from street vendors
pretty immersive

gamespot

Paid juournos

Reviewers, unlike this community, don't get any pleasure out of telling people that everything they enjoy is actually bad.

imagine if all the time putting dildos in the game was invested in areas like lifestyle class choices and bug fixes.
They could just sell a dildo pack as dlc.

Are games really hard to make these days? Why is every triple A game that comes out these days feels half complete garbage?

Mack Mackerson

Somehow all the people that actually play the game say it's good

ironically its easier then ever. The companies just keep hiring idiots.

>metacritic.com/game/pc/cyberpunk-2077
6.9

>metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/cyberpunk-2077
2.8

>metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/cyberpunk-2077
3.8

Imagine if one of the great studios of the 2000's had todays tools and budgets.

>actually play