Is being skinnyfat even worse than being fatfat?
Is being skinnyfat even worse than being fatfat?
Samuel Johnson
Sebastian Morgan
I think so, because at least fatfat have a clear cut goal: cut. Skinnyfat guys can't really cut or bulk.
Plus, fatfat people usually have a decent amount of muscle underneath the fat, and their legs have to be extremely strong to carry all the weight
Kevin Thomas
I honestly think its same, if you are fat you cut, and that will decrease/maintain your muscle(if you are eating your ratio protein and somewhat exercising)
If you are skinny fat, you cut also, you don't have a lot of muscle, so cutting, to get rid of the fat while eating ratio protein and lifting, is the best imo
Eli Perez
Yes because if you're fat, you've got at least some muscle from lugging all that weight around. Skinnyfat is the absolute worst starting ground.
Joshua Long
>Skinnyfat guys can't really cut or bulk.
or rather they need to do both simultaneously
that means cico+intermittent fast while increasing intensity on lifts
once they can no longer increase poundage, hold the poundage while bf% keeps dropping, once the poundage starts to slip, the bf% should be in single digits and calories can be added back
cardio not required but will speed this process
Thomas Mitchell
>all this fatfat cope
Logan Martin
Slinnyfat isn't a thing. You're just fat
Evan Green
this guy is correct
recomping is not a myth, it's a more finely-tuned process than strictly cutting or bulking which makes it tough. this is why a lot of faggots quit doing it and claim it's a meme. currently recomping (no IF) and seeing solid results.
Robert Edwards
>fatfat people have muscle
Someone post the picture showing that fat people actually have less muscle because their fat suffocates it.
Justin Lee
yeah, he's fat and have a low muscle lvl. Get some muscle first. then worry about the fat