Tes VI :Redfall leak

>new engine
Fake as fuck

Just that Bethesda has falsely sold their Gamebryo update as a new engine in the past. Not that I care because I'm not a nodev that thinks a new engine will fix all of Bethesda's problems.

they where both shit , and shit engines and graphics.

And no the game will not a ship mechanic

>It will be on a new engine
Fake.

Obvious fake leak aside, shouldn't we first ask what the hell Star field is all about? We haven't heard anything about it ever and it's supposed to be the next big thing of Bethesda. How come we know more about TES6 than about starfield that is being released several years earlier?

>fallout 4
>great
That’s how I know this post is bait. But he clearly means that those weren’t new engines at all.

Says who?

>Elder Scrolls: Nigger Land
who gives a fuck. I wanted to see how the khajit live when their race is in charge and instead we got desert skyrim.

>On a new engine
Lmao fucking disregarded. That will never happen.

Wait, do you mean it's gonna use the Fallout 4 engine or something?

When were Skyrim and Fallout 4 revealed? I think roughly a year before they each came out?
There's still quite a lot of time before it comes out for them to do all the pre-release bullshit.

1-it will contain a second word,but not even Todd Howard knows what it would be
2-where?
3-where did you see a 100% date ,i said ~2023 not 2023
4-it will be just a old engine under a new name and heavy modifications
5-how do you know
6-see 5

TL;DR is just stupid

They will downplay the uniqueness of both Highrock and Hammerfell if they have the balls to work on two regions. We'll definitely start in Highrock since we need to have a -safe- zone for everyone to get started in. Hammerfell will probably just be a sahara desert with one or two towns at the border. Remember how unique places like Cyrodiil and Skyrim were in Morrowind lore and the games before it?

include me in the screencap, faggot

They say that it will be ''unique'',but knowing them it would be anything but unique

Starfield will most likely be some sort of Mass Effect/No Man's Sky hybrid. A sci-fi RPG where you have several planets (which could all be open worlds of their own) to explore.

their engine can't handle procedural generation, don't count on it. If it's multiple planets, it's VERY small regions of each planet with invisible walls around it

They wouldn't need to be procedurally generated, though. Each planet could be handcrafted, just like the worlds in the Elder Scrolls games are.

you're overestimating Bethesda's competency

no. the "fallout 4 engine" is the morrowind engine

>NPCs that can't die
>game dialogs force player to go to the next quest even though the philosophy of the game is to let players go about it at their own pace
>level scaling bullshit
>advertised as RPG
>still can't decide whether to be an RPG or a dudebro action game
>actually a subpar action adventure game
>more RPG elements casualized to the point that it's not even an RPG anymore
>will push paid mods
>can't mod without paying a fee
>major cities with 10 NPCs in them

>A heavier modded Fallout 4 Gamebryo engine sounds like the most probable engine they used.
yeah, most likely this, but in PR they will push it as "a completely new engine"
then you open up the creation kit and find references to the FO3 chem addiction mechanics

(are) (a) (faggot)

skyrim had more rpg elements than oblivion and fo4 had more player choice than fo3

examples: perk trees in skyrim, fo4 actually having multiple endings and well motivated antagonists instead of forcing you into the suicide vat against all logic

You surely mean terminator engine