What are your thoughts on the Linux CoC

Its been nearly 3 months since the Code of Conduct was added

Has anything changed?

Attached: Screenshot at 2018-12-09 01-44-34.png (338x294, 83.81K)

Other urls found in this thread:

marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=154566676213892&w=2
marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=154566477313479&w=2
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

...

cool op retard

They can't write fuck in code comments anymore because that's rape. They'd hug but that's also rape.

Attached: coc-beacon.jpg (753x638, 199.31K)

Pretty sad.

Linux 4.19 was actually pretty buggy, for what its worth

Seems like it was a lot of bluster and hot air over nothing.

That was an anti-CoC retard trying to "make a statement" and "start a conversation" about how bad the CoC was. Also, the patch was rejected.

This is equivalent to a strawman argument. Nothing has really changed in the Linux development.

4.19 was already done before Linus took his vacation. No features were added orremoved.
And yes, Linux being buggy is to be expected. Not only is the kernel undergoing heavy changes to become a realtime kernel, everyone is having trouble debugging it. The wonders of a monolithic kernel with proprietary, unauditable blobs, and millions of lines of code.

I don't care about it. I'm not a Linux developer.

...

I believe in users who take responsibility over their own software. Users who do nothing but bitch about other people's work are nothing but whiners.

It was rejected... on the grounds the CoC doesn't cover previous commits. Also you should say CoC/Linux, Linux is only a kernel and it's the CoC what guarantees differently-abled people can develop it without cis abled white males rejecting their diverse additions for being "too retarded it doesn't even compile".

Buzzwords and strawman arguments. And you retards wonder why nobody takes you seriously.

You said the patch was rejected, how is stating the fact the patch was rejected because the CoC didn't cover pre-CoC code a strawman? And list the buzzwords, go ahead you lying faggot.
Go back to reddit.

That's why everything about modern computing is shit. It takes big teams of "developers" to manage the fucking disasters they call software. And their "professional" shit's all retarded and sterile.

Attached: Cute Website.png (921x646, 162.87K)

Rejected on the grounds the CoC doesn't cover previous commits, means it didn't prove jack shit. We'll have to see what happens if someone dares to write "fuck" in future commits.

I believe that users should take the time to develop software that's "unprofessional", "undisaster", and "unsterile". Suckless and Plan 9 exists today.

It won't happen because that's covered by the CoC.

Nice of you to completely disregard stuff like this.

The patch was rejected because nobody agreed on it. The whole "it doesn't apply to previous commits" is a nice touch though.

Nothing has changed in Linux' development and nothing will change. But sure, keep circlejerking over the evil Jewish transexual communist sjw trying to destroy the world and shit.

...

Soy.

Oh shit nigga, what are you doing?
marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=154566676213892&w=2

Oh shit nigga. He did it again!
marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=154566477313479&w=2

nicee ;^)