>[1] There have been multiple instances of inappropriate behavior over the years at LibrePlanet. For example, there is a recording of RMS explicitly saying that as president of the FSF he is not subject to the rules in the Q&A of this talk: media.libreplanet.org/u/libreplanet/m/the-gnu-philosophy-ethics-beyond-ethics/.
Hasn't LibrePlanet been an echo chamber since the very beginning? Would it really be such a big loss if they'll stop inviting Richard to talk about the same old four freedoms in front of the same crowd? What's the point of giving speeches about free software to the people who already use free software?
Jason Thomas
I would ban all these signers instead, since they are acting as agients proprietary/cuck software by sowing discord in the free software community.
TopGNU! RMS cucking social justice culture again. WEW, again accusations coming from someones arse. Like when the FSF licensed someone because that person was specifically a tranny.
You could bring a BFG9000 to kill the potential harassers, harassers will come as long as you have a definition of harassment that makes 99% of the population harassers.
And the earth would still spin around the sun.
The law already covers that. If someone harasses someone else call the cops.
What would be not good for the free software movement is conquer and divide tactics, like the one that these people signed for.
This is actually very interesting. Webber isn't part of the FSF anymore and has been replaced by someone else. What's interesting too is that other people are trying to redefine, redirect "free software" by trying to make for example a logo for it (the GNU logo is more than enough), or by trying to redefine other kind of popular networks, so that the attention is directed towards the ones who came with the new definitions.
Proof or gtfo! And president Obama still as presidential immunity and will never be judged for validating the continuation of PRISM. Your point is ?
Imo RMS is more of a symbol of freedom nowadays, is speech are still encouraging and fairly simple to newcomers. Because libre plannet also attract newbies who don't know about free software.
This Proof please.
Alexander Russell
(checked)
Adam Lee
What are they even doing there? Have they produced a single line of useful code?
James Hernandez
What a bunch of faggots really.
Elijah Morris
Has RMS responded yet? Someone please email him regarding his response.
Elijah Martin
RMS is too smart to fall for this bullshit.
If he complies to this crap it could be used against him and as the acting head of the FSF it would look bad, let alone if it led to any disciplinary action. He's quite right as head the rules don't apply to him, nor should they.
CoC infringed freedom 0 in free software and here's why (freedom 0)The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose What if I want to make an A.I bot software that have antisemitic trait as apart of its characteristic. According to COC agreement, I am not allowed to do this. Therefore, the adoption of GPLv3 license onto software is useless when the COC were added.