We would need to go from alphabet glyphs to dotcode (something like QR codes) to make "glyphs" convey an amount of information that is closer to the amount of information necessary to represent them. However, would it be possible to teach humans reading dotcode efficiently and reliably? Using most of possible bitmaps representable in a given type of array as "glyphs" makes differentiating them from one another much more difficult - even hardware devices have trouble reading dense dotcode if the circumstances (lighting conditions etc.) are not optimal, even though they have no issue with processing them quickly.
Creating a Dense Information Glyph
Lucas Ward
Jacob Wood
there's your redundancy
Ian White
stopped reading there
Landon Reed
data loss is practically inevitable if reduction is your goal.
I think english is excellent tbh. there is alot we don't even know about english on average. can you even handwrite, bro? like cursive, flowing, connected, handwriting, with a pen? Dan Winter showed how all english handwritten characters can be created by viewing a 3d spiral (expanding outward and upward by the golden ratio) from different angles. that was lost in translation once we started using block print. Some jew wrote a book about it (hebrew and english both can be made from the spiral) and Dan shared the info for free because it's fundamental in our language and that knowledge shouldnt be locked behind a paywall. Dan even called the guy a jew. that jew sued Dan and stole his website. Dan Winter is a hero, that jew is a sheckle-grubber.
How many other mysteries of language exist unknown to most people, that would be totally lost if we move on to a new system before even truly understanding this one?
I'm glad somebody else showed a masonic trestle board, I can't upload graphics from TOR
masonicdictionary.com
No offense bro, you're trying something new and that's cool, but Binquadratetric is much more graceful than this circle jerk IMHO
gregapodaca.com
I think we should use Base65536 in modern computing & cryptography, and anybody who is sick of Arabic numerals could start learning BQT as a new system of notation. Although I like Base10, and it is not arbitrary (as Vortex Math shows it is inherent in nature) so we should not give up on Base10.. but base65536 can be much more informationally dense, and is beautiful, and is not arabic in origin (neither is base ten, just our most common form of writing in base10).
btw that could also be used as a base16 writing system using only 1 instead of 4 of those glyphs, then it's BQ not BQT (BinQuadratic rather than BinQuadraTetric)
"Darmak and Jalad at Tanagra" :-)
Justin Collins
op, i think you are describing a painting. it's a massively parallel "glyph", not serial like traditional written language. it can tell an entire story, contained in a rectangular frame.