Python vs php vs ruby

PHP is much more flaky than Pythong mate

Money
A well-designed language designed around a bad-design paradigm.
Dead.

python can replace both of the others easily though

why so assblasted?
a python programmer rejected you or something?

...

Don't pretend like PHP has a legitimate reason for existing. It's objectively terrible; even worse than server-side JavaScript.

Axe

You can chisel a hammer with a screwdriver
wrenches suck

Honestly, I choose TCL.

PHP is a very bad language. It used to be extremely bad, now it's merely very bad. Far too many of its flaws are just design errors, not even tradeoffs. Only use it if you have to. PHP codebases are not always worth rewriting.
Python is pretty good. Sometimes a bit too dynamic for its own good, but that's partly offset by a norm of idiomatic, "pythonic" code. Most importantly, it's very versatile. You will be able to use it for a lot of different things and still have a lot of libraries and existing code and documentation to help you. That makes it worth learning for most programmers, even people who mainly use other languages.
I haven't used Ruby.
Your question is bad because you're not specifying a use case.

a commonly accepted truth you can say in passing.
a commonly rejected truth you must say with force.

I love PHP. It empowers me and my gaymur grrrl friends to write badass CODE! And games about my vagina. U mad bois?

Attached: shooting-uzi-loop.gif (425x230, 1.83M)

Python:
if item in items: #proceed
C:
//doesn't even have built-in Boolean typesint range = sizeof(items)/sizeof(items[0]);int proceed = 0;for(int i = 0; i

What is _Bool?
static int int_cmp(const void *a, const void *b){ return *(int *)a != *(int *)b;}if(lfind(&item, items, &nb_items, int_cmp)) //proceed
Looks nice enough if you put that function into a misc.c file (yeah, lambdas and real genericity would make it way better). See also bsearch(3), tsearch(3) and hsearch(3) for more generic data structures.

Ok Eric

so's Forth. C is a really easy target.
It's not the 90s any more though; you must now show that your shitty scripting language is better than Nim.

While python compiler exist, the language itself was never meant to be compiled and doing so is just a hacky solution to a problem that doesn't exist.

In this case they must have meant "run", not "compile", but more generally, it's fair to say that Python is compiled to bytecode at runtime (in the case of the reference implementation).

Ruby for webdev, Python for simple tools, PHP for masochism.

None

...

Where is your God now?

Attached: all in one.jpg (466x466, 24.52K)

Ruby is the best of those 3. It's actually well-designed, unlike Python or PHP. PHP is actually pretty fun until you trip over it (which happens often). I don't know why people still keep on using Python when Ruby exists. Ruby is just better at everything. Rails is more /comfy/ than Django. OOP is more comfy in Ruby. Ruby hasn't been hijacked by faggots. Ruby has better syntax (it's both more powerful and easier to read). And most importantly, Ruby is cuter.

Attached: proglangs.png (1920x1080, 1.02M)

now do this:
swap files 'foo' and 'bar' without the possibility that a third process (such as a web server)
1. fails to find 'foo' or 'bar'
2. opens 'foo' or 'bar' to other than their intended contents

literally lol

mfw no Fortran tan

Attached: PCC_vol4no6_may76_fortran_man_pt1.jpg (2614x3300, 2.24M)

Headers add on to a language. Their contents are not built in.

Swap what? Contents of the files, directory?
What? Do you mean lock the files during the process? There is a python module that can do that.

I don't know what you're saying but Python can rename files, or slurp file contents like:
fooContents = open(foo, r).readlines();

so, python?

which are non-pajeet then?

oxwugzccvk3dk6tj.onion/file_store/edcf324333bd3b0ededa66ecd44201ea59dba857f9fea7eb06d4111e05a87322.png
Would fuck the shit out of C#, shell, R, Scala, ActionScript

how about other anons?

swap FILES.
What the fuck would an voluntary advisory lock have to do with anything?
I mean WITHOUT THE POSSIBILITY THAT A THIRD PROCESS
python.gif

Locking a file from being modified while handling its data will prevent corruption.

Where is the verb?

FOLLOW THE LINKS BACK TO WHERE I SAID IT THE FIRST FUCKING TIME

Without a colon the list seemed unrelated.
I would copy the contents to memory, write to tmp files in their desired directories, check for changes, and rename the files while deleting the old ones.

Alternatively, one could just rename the files if you want to switch directories as well.

This will mitigate the time needed to lock the files. What's your point?

jesus christ.
python.jpeg
how does any of this contribute anything to the requirements?
this is all that matters, and it's three syscalls and a violation of requirements
python.gifv
across separate filesystems, there's no longer any way to satisfy my requirements. Directories do not matter in the slightest though.
man renameat2

Google python file transfer over network

Lua is the only sane choice left for dynamic scripting languages. It's also faster than all of the others.

*three

Sure, this sounds good in documentation, but have you ever tried to implement this outside of university? It's fucking messy.