Making money with tech

You shouldn't expect a GPL commie to understand logic, just like you shouldn't expect an actual commie to understand free exchange.

Web dev is bubble as fuck right now. Get in fast and save up bank before everybody realizes "the cloud" is a fucking meme.

Source code cannot be executed by a computer.
Binary is the only thing a computer can process.
A compiler converts source code to binary.
I'm aware that it is more complicated than that and interpreters are a thing.
I've haven't read the GPL itself but the big lines on gnu.org and that it was copyleft. I was aware of the CC license so I thought they were similar.
Am I wrong if I say that if a binary is distributed and the source code is GPL the responsible for compiling and distributing it has to make the the user aware about that the software is GPL ?

Isn't it ironic that the proprietary software developers call us communists? We are the ones who have provided for a free market, where they allow only monopoly.
-RMS

No, you aren't. Ignoring the actual requirements of the GPL which are enforced by the state through the courts, if it was us to you you'd use the government's coercive power to force every programmer to release the source code with the binaries. That's why you are a commie. At least with regular "intellectual property" you're only controlled when you are working with something somebody else created, when you're creating something from scratch then you can do whatever the fuck you want to do. Not under the world commie Stallman would like us to live under, oh no.
A free market means no government interference.
Of course, stallmanites, like the good leftists they are, try to give words different meanings to support their cause.
See? I can do it too.

m8 the GPL doesn't even force people to share the source code immediately, people are however mandate when they are asked the source code and they aren't even forced to share it on a cd or usb key it could even be paper.
lel being a communist is extremely broad from your point of view.
That doesn't mean that it's good to do so. Same as it is to live together. If you're insane and bring harm to others you are excluded, your are mentally ill and need to be medically treated.
Are you aware that making suppositions, amalgams and putting words into the mouth of people isn't making you credible ?
u want a >you ?
Get some rest off the internet and try to socialize with people who think differently from you.

If you want to make money from a project you release open source don't even think about releasing it under one of the GPL licenses. It might seem counter intuitive at first but releasing code under a permissive license such as BSD or MIT is how you make money from your open source projects.

Companies shy away from even looking at GPL code for products but will often use code with more permissive licenses. Often those companies will decide they want the open source code modified to better suit their needs and will contract with the creator to make them a custom version of the codebase since its easier than getting their engineers to do it, or companies using an open source codebase will pay the creator to maintain and improve it. I personally know someone who made a significant amount of money from the former case and an example of the latter case is the YOLO object detection codebase (pjreddie.com/darknet/yolo/ if you want to feel worthless go look at his resume).

Or they could pay the creator to just re-licence the code to them however they please (but the trick here if you're using GPL code is to never accept contributions, or have them sign over ownership to you).

fintech

That's exactly the reason why the Linux Foundation is made up of software startups who know nothing about the GPL and Linux.