>even (((Open Source))) software puts a lot of metadata into files so CIA can identify you >Zig Forums idiots will still claim that (((Free software))) provides privacy and freedom
1. Make a funny cat video and post it to your youtube channel or post on your facebook account 2. Make a video about some CIA shit or some leaked documents, post it somewhere 3. CIA correlates your second video with the first (same metadata and fingerprint) and they have your real name from facebook or youtube 4. You go to Guantanamo for education
All of this is possible thanks to (((Free software))) and niggers that made it. x264 is a botnet, stay away from it.
Gabriel Ortiz
What kind of metadata are you talking about?
Chase Torres
ffmpeg -map_metadata -1 wow that was hard
Caleb Cruz
Are you retared or just nigger?
Lucas Bell
Millennial Smartphone owner.
Luis Thomas
-Writing application -Writing library -Encoding settings -Encoded date -Tagged date
this shit doesn't work. maybe it removes some metadata, but keeps other also this shit re-encoded my video
Robert Lee
just look at Chrome or Sorosfox or Ubuntu
Mason Peterson
this still keeps the encoder and version metadata in the file
Adam Roberts
next time, do -vcodec copy -acodec copy or RTFM.
Josiah Flores
why isn't that default option? if I didn't specify codec it should just copy, not choose random codec with random settings
Adrian Wood
Breaking news: at least some metadata is required to actually decode and play the file you fucking autist
Henry Wood
Show me where in the x264 code I can find the CIA routine which fingerprints the video. You made the claim, so I'm sure you can prove it.
Jaxon Lopez
...
Jacob Barnes
You must have missed the part where we are talking about free software.
Camden Lee
Use two machines with an equivalent architecture (or virtual machines). Encode your video with the same settings. Is there any difference in the binaries? What about after stripping meta data? If not, they're not finger printing with machine specific fingerprinting.
Jose Cruz
Have you ever looked at ffmpeg documentation or typed "ffmpeg no metadata" in the search bar? I can't believe niggers like you actually exist.
shills gtfo
Lucas Cooper
Write your own! I bought a $160 on making MP3 and MP4 from scratch a few years ago, its now out of print, its so complicated I haven't even opened it in months. So if you really think its a problem then make it for yourself.
Isn't this the year all the patents are ended for MP3? And MP4?
Cameron Bennett
*book
Asher Clark
you C fuckers should go hang yourself
Carson Gray
no this is not needed to decode video: -Writing application -Writing library -Encoding settings -Encoded date -Tagged date but this spyware keeps putting the data into video
I don't give a fuck where. Just run it and open the video that it produces. fingerprint is inside video
it doesn't have to be machine specific. even "Writing application", "Writing library", "Encoding settings" is enough to track and fingerprint you, because you might be the only person (or one of few) that uses a specific combination of those values
a privacy respecting application shouldn't put any metadata and fingerprint that is not necessary. x264/ffmpeg is not privacy respecting, it's jewish open source botnet
yes nigger, there is no way to produce video without metadata
it's the job of open source niggers to produce it.
Adrian Edwards
hey dumbass, it's free and open source software, just write your own, faggot. remove the bloat you don't want, recompile. problem solved.
Christian Roberts
What kind of videos are you making that you're so concerned about the CIA tracking you down from the metadata tbh If you had truly sensitive data that was actually worth protecting from glow niggers you would write it down on paper milled without any electricity using charcoal produced from burning wood.
Tyler Sullivan
If you want to go full paranoid, that's not even enough. They can read your thoughts. Every single thing you do, you are only able to do, because you are allowed to, by them.
Carson Young
literally needed for anything to read it.
Anthony Rivera
Because it's a multimedia transcoder meant to do encoding work and your ouput container might not even be capable or allowed to hold the codec your source uses. Example for not allowed: Webm Example for not possible: Opus or Vorbis or any other video encoding than h26(x
Jaxon Cox
incorrect. Encoding settings string contains much more info that could be read from the way you need to decode this video
Aiden Sullivan
It's that simple. Even cuckchan managed to do it. You can't do this because you're a luser who knows nothing and does nothing except whine about jews and CIA.
Elijah Perez
do you produce child videos?
Evan Ramirez
UNIX is a botnet
Adam Roberts
what book?
Matthew Wilson
how to make a video without metadata? or how to remove metadata after making video?
Camden Rivera
...
Jacob Rogers
these are not unique just use relatively common settings and not use exotic encoders Ez to remove or to not write them in the first place, read the fucking ffmpeg manuals
because u dumb gay
Austin Garcia
OP didn't say anything about removing metadata that is necessary to decode a video
they don't have to be fully unique to be usable by them
where are the statistics of most commonly used settings and encoders?
Thomas Hall
OP did not even know such metadata exists
Grayson Johnson
Is this how low the IQ of a typical Zig Forums poster?
Brayden Scott
Use a hex editor and overwrite any offending bits.
Jaxon Hill
If the data is "required" and depends on things like the library versions, why not just use a bundle of encoders? You could pull any git commit of ffmpeg for example and use them at random via a script. Almost like how ReScene uses multiple versions of rar binary to reconstruct. Except in this case you store ffmpeg-sha1-1, ffmpeg-sha1-2, ffmpeg-sha1-3, etc. and instead of using a specific version on purpose, you use a random one.
Or just accept it. If the CIA has a problem with my videos, I want them to come and find me. I'll upload a fingerprinted video file of glowing green goo when it's over.
