Year of the GNU/Linux desktop

Kali Linux is the best and Ubuntu is second and CentOS is third.

>distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=void
>distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=alpine

As long as the distro has systemd unaudited private code made by literal redhat cianigger spooks you're just as well better off using Winblows(((TM)))

newsobserver.com/news/business/article213676919.html

Attached: 0664f1d41ea4b9bb3aac6781923a8b66a52cf8109174dbb05e8a4d8c2724a925.jpg (1280x719, 109.09K)

Been using AntiX, it's decent

GuixSD

systemd is an init, as such it's just one piece of a system that is easily interchanged.
Doesn't matter. and in the end it's a choice, like every distro.
It's just another grain of sand in the desert of *nix distros.

Where were you when dbus or any other part of systemd-project used on non-systemd systems can render non-systemd systems unoperable? And I mean in long-term, there's no way devs will somehow make it compatible with the dbus fork that would follow rendering whole gnu/linux completely dependent on (((redhat))). Because, let's face the facts, 90% of people running linux are either lainskiddies, literal white niggers or corporations. Would some dev not conform? :) they already conformed by their software being dependent on dbus etc
NIGGERS GTFO

Except it's not. Distros ship with systemd build their packages around systemd with systemd service files, changing init will result in complete rewrite of every single service file.

this

joke's on you user.

Attached: anonscrot.png (1366x768, 360.38K)