They were only more or less crude approximations. Now those are absolutely plausible faces, nigh-indistinguishable from actual ones.
Website generates a fake face with AI
Parker Watson
Angel Garcia
hmmm...
Jose Roberts
Those randomly created "faces" can be assigned as avatars to specific AI instantiations.
David Morris
Are they being created on the fly each time you refresh the page, or are they preredered and randomly chosen from a preexisting base of pictures? If the former, what its the probability of the same face ever being generated again?
Can the pictures be somewhat automatically be fed into the AI which approximates the age of the (would-be, in this case) person in the picture? Is there any AI which would recognise with a very high degree of probablility whether what is pictured is a real person's face or just a fake face generated by another AI?
Xavier Perez
...
Ryan Walker
This photo looks fake as shit because of the upper right should crease line and the eyes. This photo looks fake as shit because of the facial features not matching eachother i.e masculine chin with female eyes along with the right ear having a light strip through it and photoshoppy image artifacts in the upper right of the ear. This photo looks more convincing except for the hairline looking like veins instead of hair and the crease along the neckline between the shirt and skin not reflecting light properly. This photo >> looks 100% real except there is a artifact in the hairline on the right hand side of the photo that gives away editing/fakeness and the left hand side has hair that is unnattached to the head all of which could be easily cropped out. And the last two that were posted look fake as shit for obvious reasons.
Data mining complete now fuck off.
Chase Bennett
These too are more or less crude approximations except for maybe this picture which has artifacts on hair on the right and detached hair on the left. This is nothing new its just more convincing to those not watching.
Joseph Rodriguez
The classical masters were entirely capable of painting photorealistic images, this includes faces. That was 600 or so years ago. People are still trained to this day and are capable of painting or drawing photorealistic images of people who don't exist.
Also, these "faces" like in the OP look like shit and are definitely distinguishable from a real human face and not.
Xavier Rodriguez
this 70-year-old woman, through the power of makeup, almost looks to be 30.
Blake Clark
archive.li
Based on the work of NVIDIA researchers.