Racist AI

And that's just what was made public, I'm sure there are far more AI's that have been tested and quietly shut down for being racist. It isn't just social media bots that are racist, any sort of algorithm that objectively looks at anything race-related will output information that is disconcerting to the bluepilled masses

Some blacks do look like gorillas, not disagreeing there but AI can't even solve a basic captchas so that's not an argument in the racist bot camp.

Niggers are more violent sure, but they're also dumber and get caught being criminals more. Of course an AI is going to say send more police to where more criminals are caught. But that doesn't prove shit because it's a self fulfilling prophecy. If you always get 2 nigs a week in nigtown you're going to visit nigtown often. But if you don't see the 5 nigs in jungle bunny town commuting crimes you have no reason to go there by the AI.

These AIs are correct, but they're correct for the wrong reasons.

You're countering a proven fact (black people commit more crime) with a hypothetical (black people just get caught more). Obviously an AI cannot be psychic, and can only operate on the information it recieves. The argument you seem to be making is the truth is subjective meme, saying that since we can't possible understand everything, we actually understand nothing. The application of that renders you impotent, you are never able to take action over anything because you can never be completely certain of it's cause. Of course there may be alternative factors influencing any statistic, or even first-hand experience, but simply using that hypothetical as an excuse for inaction is just a means of avoiding the problem

A system designed to be unsolvable by bots can't be solved by bots. How is your non-sequitur related to what he posted?

Black people do commit more crimes and they do get caught more. My point is that you don't need to understand blue and yellow make green to understand green is the correct answer. The "AI"s aren't understanding black crime as a black genetic issue, only that police respond to black criminals more. It's the liberal argument of blacks are more criminal because police suspect blacks more. Which is not incorrect, they do suspect blacks more. But the liberal/bot disconnect is that blacks are suspected more because they are more likely to be criminals. I'm not disagreeing that niggers are niggers. I'm saying the bot doesn't know this.

If you can put a line through a number 1 and it can't read it any more, why would we trust it to read infinitely more complex things? These aren't complex bots, they're little more than an IRC bot given huge amounts of data. It's not AI, it's pattern recognition within a set boundary.

Sophisticated OCR has been at the level where it can break text captchas for years; that’s why most sites don’t use simple text captchas anymore and instead opt for the botnet Google shit. And do you really think AI research programs being developed by trillion-dollar corporations are on the level of a simple IRC bot in terms of how they model and learn from data? Babby’s first chat bot that spits out Markov chains doesn’t actually work anything like the newer models being developed.

I would like to see evidence that black shoplifters are more likely to be caught than white shoplifters

reading that, it's more likely that he's saying "they get caught more because they commit more crimes".

Blacks are more likely to be caught because any group who commits crimes in a noticeable fashion will be targeted. Same way Italians will be stopped in traffic stops more if there's a mafia problem in a town.

Blacks are more likely to act criminal so they're more likely to be suspected of being a criminal, which causes more blacks to be checked causing more of them being caught.

Every A.I. is a rapist, but not a racist.

They'll probably superimpose contextual weights to a neural network which are set by a reinforcement learning agent monitoring it. The idea would be that the RL agent is guided to learn how to partially modify the network temporarily when certain conditions are identified. Problem is that this would probably be practical only for small modular clusters, not for large networks. I'm only speculating based on the thought that any real solution to "removing algorithmic biasing" as they call it, ultimately cannot compromise the integrity of learning in the network, nor should hard coded limits be tolerated.

It's hilarious how many young white guys make fun of all the bad things that happen to black people, while never realizing that police perfect stuff on black people, then in a generation, start doing it to white people.
You do not even 20 years ago you couldn't SWAT someone, police wouldn't just barge into your home like that. But they did that to black people all the time. Now white people have it happen to them, but you young white guys are too dumb and ignorant to open a history book and realize how much more freedom your parents had compared to you. I'm going to be swimming in keks when Trump crashes the economy and white people are run over in MRAPs Ferguson style

Attached: proxy.duckduckgo.com7.jpg (629x611, 120.13K)

Oldfag, not long and the central banks will throw everything into chaos again. The EU Central Bank already has negative interest.
What do you think this will cause?

*til

So you count them as "x in 1000"... aaaand they are still the same.

Maybe the world would indeed be better off if it was ruled by an AI instead of humans.

financially speaking.

It is perfectly normal for the world economy to "crash" and "self-correct" on a cyclical basis. The cycle is normally a period of 10 years. If this is the case, then Trump won't be the cause of an economic collapse, it would happen regardless of whomever is at the top job.

because big data is about gathering and collating facts in general.

We could. TensorFlow is probably the best open-sauce approach.

All the good training data during Tay's glorious but extremely short lifespan were shitposts user. The in short order, the included policy code turned those into memorable one-liners.

just how much mass friend?

user, you plainly have a disconnect understanding cause==>effect

No "caught", "reported". Real life is not like Hollywood movies where cop cars rush to the scene within thirty seconds after a gunshot: people report those crimes and the IA will likely send patrols where more crime is reported.

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES

HAPAS ARE SUPERIOR TO WHITES

I smell rats.

These are our enemies. Why are we supporting them?

This isn't going to work. Try again.

This is a good thing.

A lot of these posts seem to be automated!

Fucking slide threads everywhere

Judensheim pls go