Now that's an enticing price range, but it seems to only have SAS connectors.
I've never dealt with SFP+, thanks for your post. (Neat pic too)
Man, I don't even know what to tell you. All the info I need is in your post. I'll save it and give a hard thought about a NAS. Still, just using a NAS for backup seems like a viable solution as well, and living with an unreliable software RAID. I wonder how anons deal with the 1 part. The usual solution is trusting your data to some big botnet like Amazon, I find that so unsavory.
Wyatt Reyes
Lol I bet you browse reddit.
Evan Brown
Same shit with NTFS. If there is a mismatch in the NTFS partition data itself it will also decide to altogether stop functioning. Could recover everything though if not exclusively winfag-cock only.
linux raid 1 will only read off one drive for a sequential read no matter how many drives you have mirrored. you will only see a performance boost if you have multiple simultaneous reads, which is why you always use raid 10 far 2 in every single use case.
that's break for backup but the performance is shit unless you have a 10 gigabit network. max throughput on 1gigabit is only 125MB/s
your going to need a hardware raid card no matter what you do if you want to raid ssd's and get the performance you should be getting. 2 ssd's in raid 10 will be gimped by the sata bus.
Chase Hernandez
I don't get it. Why doesn't RAID 10 read off of 4 disks at once? If you're only reading a single large file, it should do this. This makes no sense.
