phoronix.com
tldr of this extensive benchmark is that linux 5.0 is performing worse in almost every metric. it's not substantial, but it's measurable.
phoronix.com
tldr of this extensive benchmark is that linux 5.0 is performing worse in almost every metric. it's not substantial, but it's measurable.
Other urls found in this thread:
reddit.com
blog.fefe.de
lkml.org
lkml.org
github.com
en.wikipedia.org
googleprojectzero.blogspot.com
lkml.org
connect.linaro.org.s3.amazonaws.com
genode.org
opensource.com
esr.ibiblio.org
zdnet.com
github.com
kernel.org
phoronix.com
kernel.org
kernel.org
twitter.com
Fug
How long until they break userspace?
kek
Linux 5 is slower thanks to new spectre/meltdown patches. That's it.
If you truly believe the only reason Linux is a quality kernel is that Linus said bad words on the mailing list you're a retard. If you think there are new "le sjw nigger tranny dindu nufin" devs you're a super retard. Absolutely nothing has changed in the dev cycle and there are no new maintainers.
WHAT HAPPENED TO THE PERFORMANCE
If it's spectre/meltdown then AMD64 CPUs should be hit less because they mitigated some issues in hardware (which makes them slower in the first place tho).
Everyone in this thread is blaclisted and blocked from commenting or contributing on Linux. Except for this good goy
That's not how you write "they didn't have this fault".
THIS
Get fucked incels