Eye of the Lynx: imageviewer aimed at browsing porn

I released version 1.1.0, it fixes excessive ram usage, several files that used to fail to load, including due to paths with unicode in them.

I also added a few small features.

gitgud.io/eye-of-the-lynx/eol-build

I've been using it myself for fapping for a few months and have been quite satisfied so far with it.

Attached: ce50d133b4b3764d3bd3b182504e7301.png (200x200, 91.24K)

Other urls found in this thread:

pornhub.com/users/stephenlynx
twitter.com/AnonBabble

No one cares about degeneracy here, go away.

what makes it good for browsing pronz? better watch out son im about to release nigchink once i get the downscaling to work in

Usability aimed at making it easier to jack off while browsing images.

I am not familiar with nigchink, I'll see what I can see about it.

it's in vipquality stage. only real Gs have access to it right now

why would i use this instead of eog? its probably a disk raper just like all other image viewers that support browsing are.

Good question, because I used to use eog.
Directory browsing from the image viewer and vertical image scrolling. Eog was what made me try my hand at making a new image viewer, because of how inconvenient I found it to browse porn.

i would be fine with anything else but eog is the only one that does not try to load every file in the directory when it opens. in other viewers you can only view single files if you dont want to wait while it rapes the disk for a minute before the picture even becomes visible(its a really big directory but this works fine in eog so its a issue in the other viewers). eog allows going to the next picture by pressing the arrow key and it only loads the file that is visible so no disk rape happens.

I do the same. I only load an image if it's going to be viewed.

maybe i could try that then. before eog i used mirage(some shitty abandoned python viewer but it had a nice minimal ui and its the picture that i want to see not the ui) and tried everything else that was in the repos but they had the same problem or didnt have all the features that i wanted.. its really slow when you try to load some 5000 pictures at once from a network share and hdds.