Why did he hate UNIX?

Why did he hate UNIX?

hooktube.com/mBgIBF9Y6PE?t=862

Attached: unnamed.jpg (900x900, 108.15K)

Other urls found in this thread:

unlambda.com/index.php?n=Main.Mit
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

He hated Unix because he liked directly programming the hardware. Unix works by abstracting the hardware through an API. He didn't like this abstraction getting in the way of directly programming the computer.

Are abstractions niggerlicious then?

Yes in fact, "you're like a nigger floating in the ocean who doesn't know what's under his own feet."

Was he schizophrenic and autistic?

Attached: 0ef2854ecc24595e69961731ce9319f7dc7b5daff84e83259bf6265ca46fa0e0.png (600x600, 52.65K)

Terry wasn't concerned about using high level programming languages to program the computer. Terry was concerned about not having direct access to hardware because of OS getting in the way of it. If you study TempleOS, you'll find that it doesn't have memory protection in the software. He didn't want the OS to manage the memory, he wanted the programmer to manage the memory which includes the ability to overwrite the memory of other processes. He wanted to directly poke at I/O ports from the application program instead of using an API as the middleman between the programmer and the machine.

Think of the templeos similar to the design of the C64, no gay shit.

Unixfags and unixhaters fear him.
Abstraction is for niggers.

Exactly. TempleOS was specifically modeled after the experience he had tinkering with his C64. That idea is what makes TempleOS so interesting in today's world. We already high quality, high reliability, high performance OSes today. TempleOS is different in that it goes back to the operating environment of the earlier age and implements it into today's contemporary hardware.

is it free software?

It's "public domain", so free, but not copyleft.

He also said something like "linux is like a semi-truck, windows is a car and temple os is a motorcycle", which would suggest that he well acknowledged that other systems are more suited for certain jobs

Of course. TempleOS was a place to have fun and tinker with shit, all while praising and glorifying the Lord.

Attached: christian deportation force.webm (480x270, 7.93M)

Because of the MIT niggers who think that UNIX is the only "correct" or the state of art of OS design. The same MIT niggers are only able to parrot what their professors told them, without being able to think for themselves.

Name one.

lisp machines

Neither of those are a sign of high performance. They really call quality into question too.

Lisp machines didn't even exist. All they did was ran an interpreter which was written in C.

Nope. You can find CADR OS' source code at unlambda.com/index.php?n=Main.Mit if you're interested.

TempleOS is an embedded OS

Unix is a Java-tier monstrosity

Terry clearly had more use/interest for embedded OSes due to his background developing operating systems for his job. That's the skills Ticketmaster needed.

Technologically-inadept people who don't know what embedded OSes are will be the first to criticize TempleOS.

Imagine having to reach this badly.

Imagine having to falsify history THIS BADLY.

interesting. did he tell aabout why he did that choice? what was his thoughts on free software (gpl)? what would happen if you lock him and stallman in the computer room? would they fight or get along?

how about forth?

Unix isn't even close to gods perfection. Satan lives in compromise.

Was Terry a CIA plant?

...

Lispfags need to commit sudoku

This never happened.