There are many unnecessarily redundant components - like many programs implement their own WM - there's one in emacs, in file manager I use. The plan is to implement UI components as separate programs - one WM in every program, etc.
Sorry, stupid mistake - WMs from Window, not Virtual.
It is nonfree software.
Qutebrowser Thread
Of course they do, they make a guarantee about quality, they can't trust the 1000 WMs to do an equally good job.
Why should software be free? If it works and it's actively developed, what more do you want? I don't trust amateurs with code.
Bullshit
Nice bait, now fuck off and read this:
gnu.org
Suck Intel ME, it's trustworthy.
QtWebengine isn't updated on OpenBSD.
I can name popular WMs that are supposed to do the same thing but lack features or are unpolished.
By Stallman's definition, intel ME is static firmware, it doesn't actually do anything and no incidents have been recorded. It's part of the hardware package.
Source or fuck off.
libreboot.org
Dissenter is jew shit and part of the cancer that is killing the internet.
Static firmware is for modifiable firmware that users don't update in normal practice. Intel ME is intended to be updated from time to time (counted in periods of years).
How recent is recent?