Resources to try and understand OP
archive.fo
archive.fo
archive.fo
Riemann hypothesis
Jordan Martinez
Ian Parker
Would probably make more sense as
But I am not sure.
Hudson Torres
You see... to the people who look back on what happened later, it is you guys watching me masturbate that are the outrageous degenerates. I will kill all of you. If you saw that footage, then you are marked for death, and I will kill your children too so that there won't be anyone in the future who might feel bad about what I did to you.
There is only one infinity. Some other person pulled one set of operations out of their ass, and assigned them to this number "infinity." The number is determined by its magnitude, not its operations, and if you didn't know that then you don't know shit. Are you clear on that? The number exists independently of its operations. Please try to get this into to you retarded head. Whereas some other people have concocted a consistent set of operations for infinity, I have also concocted consistent a set of operations here. Then I said, "When infinity has a hat on it, then do the operations from my ass instead of the operations from the other guy's ass." Then I showed a thing that you can do with these operations.
I have no idea what you mean. Maybe if you write it in way that a sharp high-schooler can understand it, like the way I wrote my paper, then maybe I will see what point you're trying to make.
I actually just wrote a whole paper about topology
>vixra.org
Oliver Rogers
You should stop doxxing yourself. You really shouldn't ever post stuff like this and not take every precaution neccessary like assuming that some (((intelligence agency))) already knew all this and abused it.
Ryan Hernandez
math is boring. Reeeeeee
Grayson Sullivan
and actually, even in the pre-existing operations, there is nothing that says you have to do the absorptive operations as the first algebraic operation when absorption becomes possible. There is freedom to do the operations of infinity in any order you want, at any time you want, and the hat just tells you "Don't do the absorptive operations yet because it will destroy this fine structure id you do them now."
For instance with infinity hat you can write
(inf-hat - a) - (inf-hat - b) = (b-a)
but if you do the absorptive operation first then you get
(inf - a) - (inf - b) = inf - inf = "undefined"
That is the utility of the hat. It increases the number of things you can do. You can still everything in the normal set of operations, but you can also do new stuff that is non-trivial such as addition and subtraction of unequal numbers.
Grayson Davis
Doxxing is an involuntary thing. I am proud of my work and I like to have my name on it. I don't get too Machiavellian about things. I just do what seems right to me and leave the rest for the flying spaghetti monster to sort out. It would be easy for someone to abuse me; no one is going to abuse His Noodliness.
Noah Peterson
Yeah, posting on the "site with the muslim killer" is very smart. This is increasingly looking like a troll thread.
Adrian Ortiz
Go collect your 1mio.$ in prize money and then come here, otherwise fuck off
Thomas King
Just to ask the most basic but necessary question: what do you mean?
Let \infty represent that unique concept of infinity. How many natural numbers are there? Here I'm going to put words in your mouth and assume you agree that there are infinitely many of them.
Consider now the real numbers. Provably so, each natural number is a real number, so we know there are at least \infty real numbers. Again, provably so, there exist numbers in R not in N, so, actually there must be strictly greater than \infty elements in R. Call the amount \gamma. We know \gamma > \infty.
So, at this point, what becomes the reconcilliation of "there is only a single infinity"? OK, fine, let there be a single infinity, denote it \omega_{0}. Regardless, we know that there exists something greater than infinity, \gamma := \omega_{1}. Taking the colloquial concept of infinity just being "greater than every real number" \omega_{1} also satisfies that. So, it too is an "infinity".