Why only white men are software developers?

Different tits, you stupid woman. Did you even bother to view them? Here's some free advice: stop playing at becoming a "programmer" or "career woman"; find a man, get married, and make White babies with him. And for god's sake stop whoring yourself out on the internet for attention, it's embarrassing.

niggers are niggers.

Women I think it's a bit more complicated; there should be very little evolutionary pressure for no women understanding tech, it's an entirely new stimulus to our species. I think it has more to do with how white culture works. They have absolutly zero pressure to go into a field like tech. You could spend decades studying and perfecting a craft orrr now get this you could just be a thot and get a better outcome.

You can kind of start to see this if you look into other cultures that have more female devs. blog.hackerrank.com/which-countries-have-the-most-skilled-female-developers/ so far the top looks like india, kindof guessed it from ancedotal evidence before looking it up, because I deal with a lot of indian women. They have two big driving reasons. In india tech stuff is seen as more prestigious white countries you'll always be a damn dirty basement dwelling nerd; india on the other hand has spread of knowledge baked into the religion; Hinduism has knowledge/teaching gods, there are villages that worship this shit. They're also big on arranged marriages, women have to actually work to get access to good men there, because the mens moms won't let them marry thots; they're super autsy about this.

No, because you can ignore all votes, or ignore the votes of a certain set of IDs, or only subscribe to votes from the people you trust. And your client could also inform other clients of the choices you make so people have an idea of what vote sources are the most popular.
Using the proof-of-work system I mention would ensure that subversion would be limited, because if you require proof of contribution to the network for clients to recognize your votes as valid (for example providing certain storage space for random blocks of data used in the network for a certain period of time) would ensure nobody tries to run multiple clients to subvert the voting system, because they would be helping the network as a whole by providing more storage space and network bandwidth to it.
Sometimes you need to make things complicated to get something done. CPUs are complicated. Cryptocurrencies are complicated. Tor is complicated.
Yes there are. Zig Forums can be taken down any minute by a change in legislation, and not even by a change in the constitution, just like automatic rifles are banned even tho it violates the spirit of the 2nd amendment.
I don't have any concrete plans to implement all of this. It's just a little brainstorming on how it could be done. Somebody will probably make something that resembles the concept at some point, if it doesn't exist already in some form.

EVERYTHING WILL BE FIRE

...