Flanking the Leftist Ideological Rear

Flanking the Leftist Ideological Rear
Alt-Liberalismisticallifragilistic
expialidocious@sshole.com

When attacking from the right-wing perspective, we force them to retreat ever further to the left, seeking safe space. By advancing the narrative from the leftward flank, we can begin driving the Overton Herd towards the center by normalizing core Centrist ideas incorrectly associated with the "Right".

Attached: chart.png (795x718 17.26 KB, 54.41K)

Other urls found in this thread:

hooktube.com/watch?v=0v5uvkszugk
youtube.com/watch?v=G-2_Bc_7Pos
sinkers.org/SPLCrussiagatesmearpieceMar0918.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

...

FIXED

no thanks

This extends well beyond race.

Ultimately, it's a strategy to subvert (((their))) censorship methods.

It's the same tactic the Vietcong employed against America when we began using our air superiority to deliver Napalm morning calls.

Did they run? Put more distance between them and their enemy? Retreat to more friendly ground, with air defense and just avoid the napalm?

No. They closed distance. They got too close to the Americans for us to be able to use napalm against them without scorching our own guys.

Twitter, Facebook and Youtube's weapon of choice is algorithmic censorship. It's a convenient scapegoat when things go wrong, can't punish it, they won't retire it. It allows them mass coverage of the information landscape. Algorithms are essentially the 'Smart' napalm of the information war.

In order to defeat it, we must get close to our opponent. Not engage them as open opponents. Engage them as disruptive comrades.

Even sowing dissension is victory enough to utilize this stratagem.

That’s not what OP is saying fam, he’s saying that we basically undercover shitpost about things that we have common ground with them on and it will make them gravitate more towards our position. I think it’s a great idea but I’m not sure if it will work. The nature of our ideology is not something that exist on a left-right political spectrum. In fact, it’s not political at all. It’s not even ideological or philosophical. It’s just the most natural and basic instinct of self-preservation, it’s just a (((weird circumstance of history))) that makes it so we have to defend our basic desire to exist on political or ideological grounds. Many pro-white people are ideologically left wing or liberal socially. Basic freedoms, basic rights for citizens, probably some kind of social safety net for injured workers, widows ect. So I mean, maybe the idea could work. I don’t honestly know. Wouldn’t hurt to try it.

Is no one going to point out that OP is:
1. Namefagging
2. A faggot
?

Do you think they intended to make the Black Panther story parallel White Separatist goals?

No.

You're right that our common bond is a desire to survive. It's a natural one that everyone can identify with.

It is because they don't understand us, but we do understand them, that allows us to spot and point out these logical fallacies.

It's time to do more than point out. It's time to make good fucking use of them.

Ironic shitposting namefagging is never a sin.

And as a certain forehead might say, not an argument…faggot!

You don't understand the overton window. By maintaining radical right-wing agenda and having influence on society pulls the center closer to the right. 100 years ago centrism was much closer to the current right then it is today.