James Fields Murder Trial

Oh boy, with this happening alongside the alt-kike's optics cuck induced implosion, we should be in for a hell of a fun time. Vanguard allegedly had something like it's fifth schism last week, so they're not even a player anymore, but watch for Faglin and co. trying to spin this as the fault of bad optics Nazis.

Should be a short trial with the video showing the whale wasn't touched by the car.

Admissions of guilt aren't hearsay. The antifa's gun waving is admissible (in any legit court). But sonofjewo is wasting everyone's time with his 6 hr videos that only prove what everyone already knows. They don't want 100 more people making them deal with the same shit.

If he is convicted will we riot like when Rodney King was found guilty for assaulting OJ Simpson?

what I mean is, what does the media want to portray us doing and be responsible for?

Just stress the fact that he's a kike.

he was being chased by a marxist with a rifle
possibly shot at
his car was being surrounded by angry blacks and marxists with clubs and shit
he used well within reasonable force to escape
and he didn't even hit the land whale
who, of course, died from a heart attack due to getting exercise and being in a stressful situation while morbidly obese.

he literally did nothing wrong
of course, the (((jewdicial))) system being what it is
who knows how it will turn out
the lying press has certainly been spending a lot of time demonizing this guy and the protest in general.

should has archived it

Probably.
I suspect his entire purpose is to lose the case, despite the fact that this case should be pretty muc open-and-shut. He didn't kill anyone, and there's no evidence of any ill intent, as far as the public has been shown.

Funny how Cville police haven't released the aerial video, no?

Nope.
Just like we didn't when that blonde Jew got shot by an illegal with a stolen government firearm.
We'll do nothing.

We never do anything. Because we're White. And "White people don't do that".

If we were any other group, they'd be covering this case on CNN like with Trayvon or Brown.
Instead, because we're White, they'll not cover this at all until its finished, and upon the guilty verdict the media will swarm out of the woodwork to declare this case all wrapped up, proving once and for all that Fields was an evil hate-filled Nahtzee who killed innocent peace-loving anti-racism protestors who were just in the street to share love and sharing love can never be illegal.

Reminder: just because they make a trial for the masses doesn't mean he isn't an agent or a crisis actor.
Even if he is found guilty, you'll never know if he was sent to prison.

Someone please post images of the entire document - people need to read this shit.

The city is very-obviously attempting a cover-up.

This is looking more and more likely the more I read this document, and everyone needs to see this shit.
The city, the police, the judge, even Fields' defense, appears to be working in cooperation to conceal these videos from release to the public.

Let's see how this looks…

AFFIDAVIT OF WILLIAM N. EVANS

I, WILLIAM N. EVANS (“Evans”), certify that the facts below are true and accurate, to

the best of my knowledge.

1. Evans is a citizen of the United States and resides in Fairfax County, Virginia. As a citizen

of the United States and of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Evans is entitled to certain rights

under the First Amendment, the Virginia Constitution, the Virginia Code, and the Virginia

Freedom of Information Act (“VFOIA”), §§ 2.2-3700 et seq.

2. Evans, an independent journalist, runs a YouTube channel under the pseudonym

‘SonofNewo’. The channel offers Evans’s reporting, opinion and analysis of current events

in the news.

3. Evans’s YouTube videos on the August 12, 2017 car attack in Charlottesville have,

collectively, garnered over 600,000 views. His most-viewed video on the August 12

incident, entitled “Analyzing Charlottesville’s Zapruder Film: the Ford Fischer LiveStream”,

has garnered over 300,000 views alone.2

4. Evans has no association with, and does not support or endorse the views of, any of the

individuals, groups, or entities that were marching, demonstrating, protesting, or otherwise

present in downtown Charlottesville on August 12, 2017.

5. First Respondent, the CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE (“The City”), is an independent city

in the Commonwealth of Virginia. The City qualifies as a “public body” under VFOIA.

6. Second Respondent, JOSEPH D. PLATANIA (“Platania”), is the elected Commonwealth’s

Attorney for the City of Charlottesville. He is named in his official capacity. As a

constitutional officer of the State of Virginia, Platania qualifies as a “public body” under

VFOIA § 2.2-3701.3

Could be worse.

7. James Alex Fields (“Fields”) has been charged with murder and several other felonies

stemming from an incident on August 12, 2017, in which he allegedly rammed his car into a

crowd of people in downtown Charlottesville, at the intersection of 4th Street and Water

Street (“the August 12 incident”)

8. On December 14, 2017, a preliminary hearing occurred in the Fields criminal case, before

Judge Robert H. Downer of the Charlottesville General District Court.5

9. Commonwealth’s Attorney Platania and Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney for the City of

Charlottesville, Nina-Alice Antony (“Antony”), appeared before the Charlottesville General

District Court for this hearing.

10. Fields’s attorney at that hearing was Denise Lunsford (“Lunsford”), who served as

Commonwealth’s Attorney for Albermarle County from 2007 until 2015. She is currently in

private practice.

11. On information and belief, prior to the preliminary hearing, the Commonwealth’s Attorney’s

office and the City, through its agents and/or representatives and/or employees, discussed

what evidence would be presented at the hearing.

12. During the preliminary hearing, Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Antony, acting in her

official capacity, played two videos of the August 12 incident in open court (“two videos” or

“videos”). One of the videos was filmed from a Virginia State Police helicopter that hovered

above the scene. The other was surveillance video from a camera posted outside the Red

Pump Kitchen, a restaurant located at the corner of 4th Street and Main Street in downtown

Charlottesville, one block north of where the August 12 incident took place.

13. On information and belief, these two videos had not previously been shown to the public.

14. In the gallery watching the proceedings and the videos that day were national media

correspondents from the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, and the Associated

Press (“the media”), as well as avowed white nationalist Jason Kessler (“Kessler”).

15. Kessler is currently, and was at the time of the Fields preliminary hearing on December 14,

2017, facing perjury charges in Albermarle County for allegedly giving false statements to a

magistrate judge in an unrelated case. He is scheduled to be tried in March 2018.6

16. The contents of the two videos were widely reported on by the media and by Kessler in the

day following the hearing.

17. In a January 5, 2018 phone call, Platania and Antony told Evans the following about the

December 14, 2017 preliminary hearing:

a. Prior to the hearing, neither the Commonwealth’s Attorney nor the court provided

advance notice to the public that the two videos would be played or introduced into

evidence (except ten minutes prior to the hearing, when the Commonwealth’s

Attorney spoke to some of the victims to warn them about disturbing images

contained in the videos).

b. Prior to the hearing, neither the Commonwealth’s Attorney nor the court provided

advance notice to the public that a motion “to withdraw all exhibits” or other motion

to close the record would be issued or granted that day.

c. During the playing of two videos at the preliminary hearing on December 14, the in-

court screens were turned towards the gallery so that all present could see.

d. Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Antony confirmed that she was aware that

media were in the courtroom and watching during the playing of the videos.

e. Commonwealth’s Attorney Platania confirmed that the two videos were introduced

into evidence, and that Judge Downer relied upon the videos as evidence when he

certified James Fields’s case up to the Circuit Court.

f. According to Platania, the two videos were withdrawn from Fields’s case file, without

objection from the defense, through a motion “to withdraw all exhibits” that was

granted by the court.

g. According to Platania and Antony, this motion “to withdraw all exhibits” was issued

orally by Antony, consented to by Fields’s defense, and granted orally by the judge,

such that neither the motion nor the order granting the motion are contained in the

Fields case file.

h. Antony confirmed that no gag order, or other order restraining the media from

reporting on the contents of the two videos, was pursued by the Commonwealth, and

none were issued by the court before, on or after Dec. 14 regarding the two videos.

i. Antony confirmed that she is aware that the media has reported on the contents of the

two videos that were shown in court.

18. On January 18, 2018, Evans obtained a transcript of Fields’s December 14 preliminary

hearing from Lanes Court Reporters.8 A review of this transcript reveals that:

a. Both videos were entered into evidence and given exhibit numbers. The helicopter

video was entered as “PH Number 4”,9 the Red Pump Kitchen video was entered as

“PH Number 5”.10

b. Six other records were also entered into evidence and published at the preliminary

hearing:

i. The autopsy report of the deceased victim of the August 12 incident, Heather

Heyer, entered as PH Number 1;11

ii. Four Photographs of Fields’s Dodge Challenger that were taken after his

arrest, entered as PH Numbers 2(a) – 2(d);12 and

iii. A chart summarizing the injuries incurred by victims of the August 12

incident, entered as PH Number 3.13

c. The two videos were played in open court, viewed by those present in the courtroom

gallery, and elaborated upon by the State’s witness, Detective Steven Young of the

Charlottesville Police Department.

d. Fields’s defense attorney, Lunsford, did not object to the admission of the videos on

Sixth Amendment or any other grounds, and in fact consented to their admission into

evidence.

e. At the conclusion of the preliminary hearing, Judge Downer certified Fields’s charges

to the grand jury while the videos remained in evidence, thereby relying on the videos

to so certify.

f. Judge Downer concluded the preliminary hearing while the videos remained in

evidence, saying: “This hearing is concluded.”15

g. After the conclusion of the preliminary hearing, and while people in the gallery were

getting up and leaving the courtroom,16 Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Antony

made the following request of the court:

“Before Mr. Fields leaves the courtroom, the Commonwealth, by
agreement, will make a motion to seal the warrants as they come up to
Circuit Court and then (unintelligible) and seal for the purposes of the
public, except for the Court, Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office as well
the defense.”17

h. The “(unintelligible)” in Antony’s request is as written in the transcript produced by

Lanes Court Reporters.

i. This unintelligible request, whatever it was, was (apparently) consented to by

Lunsford and granted by Judge Downer.18

j. In the transcribed record of the hearing, no advance notice was given to the public

that this unintelligible request, whatever it was, would be made.

k. In the transcribed record of the hearing, no opportunity was provided for the public to

object to this unintelligible request, whatever it was, before the court granted it.

l. In the transcribed record of the hearing, the court provided no rationale or explanation

for its decision to grant this unintelligible request, whatever it was, before or after

granting the request.

19. On January 18, 2018, after reviewing the transcript of Fields’s preliminary hearing provided

by Lanes Court Reporters, Evans telephoned Deborah Lawrence (“Lawrence”), president of

Lanes Court Reporters, to ask about the “(unintelligible)” part of Antony’s request.19

a. Specifically, Evans asked Lawrence what Antony had said during the portion labeled

“(unintelligible)” on page 46 of the transcript.

b. Lawrence responded that she had listened to it herself multiple times, and had asked

other Lanes employees to listen to it as well, and that they simply could not make out

what Antony said.

c. As explanation, Lawrence said that Antony is a soft speaker and is sometimes hard to

hear in the courtroom.

20. Lawrence reiterated this in a follow-up call to Evans the following day, January 19, 2018.

She said that she and others at Lanes Court Reporters had listened to the portion labeled

“(unintelligible)” and could not make out what Antony had said.

21. Other than Antony’s unintelligible request, no other portion of the Fields preliminary hearing

transcript provided by Lanes Court Reporters is labeled “(unintelligible)”.

22. Besides Antony’s unintelligible request, no other portion of the Fields preliminary hearing

transcript provided by Lanes Court Reporters shows the Commonwealth’s Attorney issuing a

motion “to withdraw all exhibits”, or otherwise asking the court to seal the record.

23. On December 15, 2017, Evans sent his first VFOIA request to the City, asking to “inspect or

obtain copies” of the two videos that were played in court and reported on by the media and

by Kessler.20

24. The City did not respond “within five working days”, as is required by VFOIA.21

25. After receiving no response to his first request, Evans sent a second VFOIA request to the

City on December 26, 2017, again asking to “inspect or receive copies” of the two videos

that were shown in court. In this second request, Evans outlined certain issues with the

media and Kessler’s reporting on the two videos that can only be cured by a broader release

of the videos.22

26. On December 27, 2017, the City, acting through Lieutenant Cheryl Sandridge of the

Charlottesville Police Department (“Sandridge”), attempted to invoke the seven-day

extension period provided by VFOIA § 2.2-3704(B)(4), but did not explain why it was “not

practically possible” to respond within five working days, or “specify the conditions that

make a response impossible” within five working days, as VFOIA § 2.2-3704(B)(4)

requires.

27. The City finally responded to Evans’s VFOIA requests by email on January 2, 2018.

Sandridge, acting in her official capacity, said “The records that you request are Criminal

investigative files, pursuant to Code of Virginia section 2.2-3706(A)(2)(a), are excluded from

the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act. They will not be provided.”24

28. In the City’s January 2 response to Evans, Sandridge added as explanation that “While it [sic]

true that the video’s [sic] requested were played in open court, the Court granted at the end of

the preliminary hearing a motion by the Commonwealth to withdraw all exhibits. No

exhibits including the videos requested remain publically [sic] available.”25

29. In response to follow-up questions from Evans on the City’s denial of his VFOIA requests,

then-City Director of Communications, Miriam Dickler, told Evans on January 3, 2018, that

“I am directing this request to the Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office.”

30. During Evans’s January 5, 2018 phone conversation with Commonwealth’s Attorney

Platania and Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Antony, both Platania and Antony were

familiar with Evans’s VFOIA requests of the City and were also familiar with the City’s

responses to Evans.

31. On information and belief, in planning the City’s response to Evans’s VFOIA requests, there

was communication and coordination between (1) the City, through their agents and/or

representatives, and (2) Commonwealth’s Attorney Platania and/or Assistant

Commonwealth’s Attorney Antony, and/or other representatives of the Commonwealth’s

Attorney’s Office for the City of Charlottesville.

32. On information and belief, this communication and coordination related to the events at the

James Alex Fields preliminary hearing and, in particular, to the motion “to withdraw all

exhibits” allegedly made by the Commonwealth’s Attorney at the conclusion of that hearing

that was referenced by Sandridge in the City’s response.

35. During the January 5, 2018 phone conversation, both Platania and Antony were fully

conversant and familiar with all three topics.

36. In the January 5, 2018 phone conversation, Evans asked Platania and Antony to give him

access to the two videos that were shown at Fields’s preliminary hearing.

37. This request, although made over the telephone, qualifies as a formal request under VFOIA.

38. In the January 5, 2018 phone conversation, Commonwealth’s Attorney Platania responded to

Evans’s VFOIA request by affirmatively declining to give Evans access to the two videos.

39. On January 18, 2018, Evans sent a second VFOIA request, this time in writing, to

Commonwealth’s Attorney Platania and Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Antony. This

second request was substantively identical to the two requests issued to the City on

December 15 and December 26, 2017, respectively, and asked “to inspect or receive copies”

of the two videos that were played at Fields’s preliminary hearing on December 14, 2017.28

40. On January 24, 2018, Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Antony responded to Evans’s

second VFOIA request. Citing the same provision as the City – VFOIA § 2.2-3706(A)(2)(a)

– she said that the Commonwealth’s attorney was, “in its discretion,” choosing not to

disclose the videos.

41. In a January 5 telephone conversation, Evans asked the clerk of the Charlottesville General

District Court about the status of the Fields case file. He was told that the General District

Court no longer had any file because the case had been certified to this Circuit Court.

42. On January 16, 2018, Evans visited the Charlottesville General District Court clerk’s office

and confirmed that they had nothing on the Fields case in their records room.

43. In a January 5, 2018 telephone conversation, Evans asked the clerk’s office of this Circuit

Court about the status of the Fields case file, and specifically asked whether this Circuit

Court has the two videos that were played at Fields’s preliminary hearing in its case file. A

female employee in the clerk’s office, who said that she was communicating with the clerk of

this Circuit Court, Llezelle Dugger, during the call, affirmatively told Evans that this Circuit

Court does not have the two videos in its case file because no videos were in the file that was

delivered to this Circuit Court from the General District Court.

44. On January 16, 2018, Evans visited the Charlottesville Circuit Court Clerk’s office and

reviewed the Fields case file in the records room. He confirmed that the open portion of the

Fields case file does not contain:

a. the videos shown at the preliminary hearing; nor

b. any indication that the videos were even played at the preliminary hearing; nor

c. any record of the oral motion “to withdraw all exhibits” allegedly filed by the

Commonwealth’s Attorney at the preliminary hearing, or any record of any other

motion to seal; nor

d. any record of Judge Downer’s order supposedly granting the motion “to withdraw all

exhibits” at the preliminary hearing, or any record of any other order granting a

motion to seal; nor

e. the other records filed and published as evidence at Fields’s preliminary hearing.

45. On the evening of December 14, 2017, reporters from CNN, the Washington Post, the New

York Times, and the Associated Press filed stories on what transpired at Fields’s preliminary

hearing.

46. Each of the four stories describes the contents of the two videos shown in court of the August

12 incident.

47. Also on the evening of December 14, Kessler published a video on his Twitter account and

on his YouTube Channel in which he provided his description and interpretation of the video

filmed from the helicopter of the August 12 incident.

48. The December 14 stories filed by CNN, the Washington Post, and the Associated Press

describe Fields’s Dodge Challenger, as (apparently) shown in the two videos, arriving in the

vicinity of the counter-protesters at the intersection of 4th Street and Water Street in

downtown Charlottesville, pausing, reversing north up 4th Street, and then accelerating

towards the protesters prior to the collision.

a. CNN: “The Dodge Challenger crept up, reversed, then accelerated toward the

crowd.”

b. Washington Post: “Fields’s Dodge approached the Camry from behind at a moderate

speed. It then backed up, traveling more than a block, before accelerating forward at a

rapid clip, ramming into the back of the Camry.”

c. Associated Press: “[T]he car head[ed] slowly in what Young testified was the

direction of the counterprotesters, who were not in view of the camera. The car

reversed before speeding forward into the frame again.”

49. Prior to the publication of the December 14 stories filed by CNN, the Washington Post, and

the Associated Press, there was little public evidence of Fields’s Dodge Challenger arriving

in the vicinity of the crowd, stopping, and reversing up 4th Street before accelerating towards

the protesters. Indeed, in the days after the August 12 incident, eyewitnesses told the media

and the public that the Dodge drove straight into the crowd, without stopping or reversing up

4th Street beforehand.

50. One such eyewitness was Brennan Gilmore, who witnessed the August 12 incident from the

vicinity of 4th Street and Main Street, one block north of where the counter-protesters had

assembled. Gilmore has given numerous national media interviews, attended conferences,

and written articles about what he witnessed that day.

51. For example, Gilmore described what he saw to MSNBC on August 13, 2017, the day after

the car attack:

“I was filming, actually, a peaceful, nonviolent march of anti-racist protesters
who were coming up a very narrow street. I was in the middle of the street
myself filming them, and heard from behind me the acceleration of a vehicle.
[I] spun around, and saw the vehicle in question barreling down a very narrow
street with no traffic on it at a high rate of speed, clearly intent on doing
damage and destruction to the crowd, passed over a barrier and went down the
street, and accelerated hard as it barreled into the crowd, sending bodies
flying.”

52. On August 23, 2017, Gilmore repeated the same story on PBS NewsHour:

“Not long after [the state of emergency was declared], I found myself on a side
street – 4th Street in Charlottesville – with a couple of friends, and I witnessed
a crowd of counter-protesters, of anti-racist protesters, coming up 4th Street,
and I began to film their march. And they were in a celebratory mood
thinking that after the state of emergency, these white supremacist and nazi
groups had been banished from Charlottesville.

I began filming when from behind me I heard a vehicle accelerating very
quickly. I turned and saw the vehicle in question come down 4th Street at a
very high rate of speed. It went over a median area, and then barreled into the
crowd, sending bodies flying everywhere.”

53. On information and belief, Gilmore has never, in any of his numerous media interviews, op-

eds, and other public comments, described seeing the Dodge Challenger stopping and

pausing in the vicinity of the protesters and reversing up 4th Street prior to accelerating

towards the crowd.

54. Eyewitness video taken the day of the incident and released on the internet and to the media

appeared to confirm that the Dodge drove straight at the crowd, without stopping or reversing

up 4th Street beforehand.

55. One such eyewitness video was uploaded to Twitter by Brennan Gilmore. This video, which

shows the Dodge careening toward and colliding with the crowd without stopping or

reversing beforehand, has been viewed over six million times on Gilmore’s Twitter account

alone.

56. The publication of the media’s stories about the videos shown at Fields’s preliminary hearing

add to the public confusion and uncertainty regarding the August 12 incident.

57. The national media’s written descriptions of videos that are otherwise hidden from view do

not penetrate the public consciousness like a contemporaneous video like Gilmore’s that is

seen and shared on social media by millions.

58. The news stories describing the two videos shown at Fields’s preliminary hearing do not

reproduce the content of the videos in text form, and are not comparable to the written

transcript of an audio recording of a conversation in, for example, a deposition or 911 call.

59. In an important respect, the descriptions of the two videos provided by CNN and the

Washington Post contradict one another, further adding to the confusion surrounding the

August 12 incident.

a. CNN says that the videos show the Dodge “stopping about a block and a half away

from protesters, reversing, then driving into the crowd[.]”

b. The Washington Post says that the Dodge “approached the Camry from behind . . .

then backed up, traveling more than a block, before accelerating forward at a rapid

clip, ramming into the back of the Camry.”

c. Read together, these stories describe the Dodge “stopping a block and a half away

from protesters” [CNN], then “back[ing] up, traveling more than a block, before

accelerating forward at a rapid clip” [Washington Post] towards the protesters.

d. In other words, the CNN and Washington Post articles, read together, indicate that the

Dodge started accelerating towards the protesters from over 2.5 blocks away (1.5

blocks + 1 block = 2.5 blocks).

e. The descriptions provided by CNN and the Washington Post cannot both be accurate

because there are only two blocks of Fourth Street between Market Street and Water

Street. One cannot stop “a block and a half away” and back up “more than a block”

within a two-block span.

60. The Washington Post’s description of the two videos contradicts other videos filmed on

August 12, further muddling the public record of the car attack.

a. The Washington Post says that the helicopter video shows a black pickup truck

arriving first at the intersection of 4th Street and Water Street, before the maroon van,

the silver Toyota Camry, and Fields’s Dodge Challenger arrived.41

b. At least three other videos in the public record contradict this account – one filmed by

a roving reporter, one filmed by an anonymous citizen, and one filmed from a camera

drone. These three videos in the public record show the maroon van arriving at the

intersection of 4th Street and Water Street first, before the black pickup truck, at least

five minutes prior to the car attack and well before the counter-protesters arrived on

the scene.

61. The best way to clarify the public record is to return the two videos to the Fields case file or,

alternatively, to release the videos to the broader public.

I, William N. Evans, petitioner herein, being duly sworn, say that I have read the foregoing and
know the contents thereof, and that the same is true to the best of my knowledge, information
and belief.

I am inclined to agree with the conclusion of Mr. Evans.
I see no justification in these files being withheld from the public, as they appear to suggest a drastically different state of affairs on the ground the day of the incident than that portrayed in the media.

Can any law-fags offer insight into how/why the city is able to withhold these evidentiary files?
I mean, christ, just how jewed is our system, when there can be two videos, apparently of significant contextual import, utilized in court, but then immediately stricken from the record, without any sort of higher oversight or intervention?
This reeks of a cover-up.

For those who cannot into wall of legalese text.

tl;dr: Multiple pieces of evidence introduced, then immediately stricken from the record, after the trial had concluded, disappearing from the official court record, recorded as 'unintelligible' by the court stenographer, and the police/city/courts, acknowledging these materials, exist, refusing to provide them to the public.

Fascinating, thanks for posting.
Perhaps the videos really show what was claimed in the MSM stories, and that a comparison with the 3rd party videos would reveal irrefutable signs of pre-event staging. i.e the "evidential" videos were filmed on a different day or at a different time.
If that's the case they'll never be released because Field's and his attorney's lack of objection would certainly prove a psyop beyond reasonable doubt.

Almost like they don't want jurors or potential jurors informed.

Should have just done that, cunt.

Technically this is correct procedure. The jurors are supposed to use only the evidence admitted in court.

If the judges were honest this wouldn't be a problem.

Defense didn't object. Likely copping to a plea of some sort because the prosecution knows the evidence is damning for everyone involved and doesn't really let him off the hook for hitting people. Regardless of you thinking you have a right to save your life, rolling into a mass of people isn't one of those that gets a pass so he will get a reduced charge in all likelihood.

Attached: Eat My Own On Retainer.jpg (299x300, 21.78K)

God you are cancerous.

The evidence WAS admitted in court, then stricken. Basically, they wanted to admit it, but didn't want it to be on the record.

Seems an impossibility given what we've seen.

No, the cancer is you leddit. You have never been welcome here and your fucking attention whoring does more harm than good. Flap your fucking arms on the way to eating a bag of dicks and killing yourself.

You are cancerous.

Watch how he goes into derailing while he of course didn't touch on the part about the DEFENSE NOT OBJECTING. kek. Enjoy the meltdown folks.

based

he will 100% be killed in prison

Cancerous. And deserving of a ban. And having his posting history exposed, for that matter.

Fuck off kike. Those posts are the most relevant thing yet to appear in this thread.
Your choice of meme words speaks for itself. Filtered.

He gets to sit in jail until then so there's still time. I wonder if he is in general population now though.

Could you be any more obvious cunt?

Eat shit redditors.

See what I mean? Here he goes.

Attached: Hello Chaim.png (862x442, 342.85K)

No chain of custody and no hearsay issue.

Fields would be negating the intent element or raising affirmative defense of self defense. The evidence would be relevant and admissible in both cases.

The summary was insufficient and you remain cancer, as demonstrated here

You are attempting to derail and if it weren't for the fact that this site is dogshit and hasn't had a mod on in more than half a day, you'd be banned. With any luck, you will be when the mods return.
Cancerous and disdainful behavior on your behalf. You have contributed nothing to this thread. Fuck off.

I don't know why everybody uses the term general population.

You are either in solitary or not. Otherwise, you are among the prison population and have to deal with COs.

The answer is, it is probably terrifying for him in there no matter what, because even in solitary, you aren't 100% protected.

The most likely outcome isn't even death. It's very serious injury/permanent scarring/disabling type vicious beatings and stabbings. The psychological toll is also extremely significant. And of course, if he ever gets out, this will fuck his record forever.

They just took a dump on this kid and ruined his life because some worthless fat cunt had a heart attack.

Our justice system and our country are a joke. America is a joke.

He would still be in prison for running all those people over ISIS-style, redditspacing mongoloid.

I meant to add, when you are out among the other inmates, you have to deal not just with them, but you aren't dealing with COs on an individual level. You are dealing with them as they deal with the packs of niggers/spics that fill jails, which is by using total force and shitty tactics where they favor certain inmates/groups over others, etc. That is the danger of not being in solitary or similar where you can sort of know who your COs are and at least talk to them as people (sometimes), versus being out among the pack of wolves.

That would depend on how they charged him.

Your instant response is telling. This site is controlled by deep state kikes at this point.

Especially your reference to CIA- sponsored organization ISIS.

This seems more probable with each passing day.

General population doesn't mean "not in solitary". American prisons segregate prisoners based upon gang affiliation. General population means you aren't in one of those groups or in solitary. Btw you still have to deal with CO's in solitary, they can enter your cell and beat you at any minute of the day or night.

Nope. In some counties they run things a bit different. The prisoners have less and less access to others as their status requires. They also sometimes have "mental health" sections which have no access to anyone but other crazies. Some have very open general populations for the run of the mill criminals and non, waiting for trial.

He needs a better fucking lawyer.

They were attacking his car, and some of the commies were armed.

Yeah, just sit at home and do nothing. That'll work.

I think she deleted that tweet but here's one of her followups
archive.is/V6kvA

Except it has worked, faggot. The only thing the rally accomplished were the CIAnigger's objectives. A chopper crash was just (((cohencidence)))? Really?
TRSodomites go in the bog.

Yes cause getting doxxed and complying with kosher city and police protest demands like "you have to walk through these gates on at a time while we search you" or "you can't have swastikas", or "this is now an unlawful assembly cause we said so" sure is sticking it to the kikes

Exhibits are for the prosecution. They threw away all their evidence?

is this thread alive

Attached: Car of Freedom.png (4904x3328 235.91 KB, 558.76K)

Attached: any day now trump.jpg (1431x896 585.78 KB, 1.74M)

Geezus - have a bump

This is a typical trick by many prosecutors.
Basically they trump up the charges using a piece of evidence.

Looks like the same thing here.

...

Its obvious its a rigged trial, and under Sessions at that. The whole system is garbage, worthless, pro-white genocide.

I live in Charlottesville. What can I do?

I also know a guy who claims he's a witness for the trial and is going to claim he saw the hambeast pinned between 2 cars. He said she "bled out". Do you know how hard it is to hide your power level when you hear that shit?

Can someone post the video showing she was never hit by the vehicle?

Record him admitting that and give it to Field's attorney.

I definitely could but I'm not sure what good that would do.

Attached: sargoy_charlottesville.png (3000x2035, 4.2M)

why is a moslim womwn photoshopped into the 2nd picture

The crisis agent theory is retarded to me.

Because the man in the Dodge literally wasn't him.

Attached: JamesField(((s)))Charlottesville.jpg (427x296, 22.11K)

I hope they catch the black man in the dodge.

What ever became of the investigation into the helicopter crash that killed 2 cops?

Got ruled accidental and chalked up to faulty mainetenance.

Heil'd

LEARN TO DOWNLOAD OR SCREENCAP FULL (((SCRIBD))) DOCUMENTS YOU FUCKS

(checked)
Thanks for posting that in text form.

fuck off

I love you schizophrenics, you're always right because everything you claim is unfalsifiable.

There are other boards (or websites, if you're willing) for uploading pdf/txt. Also you can cap a whole multi-page document with a button nowadays, so that's bullshit too. If you don't know shit, deal with it and try to fucking learn next time.

You can definately tell who has actually been in jail, and who hasnt based on some of this bullshit im reading. If you havent been just keep your cock holster shut faggots

Isn't his mother's maiden name (((Bloom)))?
I still hope that he doesn't get convicted for something he didn't do.
He didn't even hit Heather Heyer, did he?

This whole thing reeks of SorosAntifa fuckery

IT'S FUCKIN SOROS BRUHS IT'S DAY OF THE END OF WHITES!! OJJABOJJAOJJABOJJAOJJABOJJAOJJABOJJAOJJABOJJAOJJABOJJAOJJABOJJA

I don't think so. Seems like she had a heart attack because she was morbidly obese and overly excited. I think she just happened to be in the general area and the liberal hysteria got the better of her. If that's true, I don't see how they can find him guilty of murder.

You get to bake with Kike Eunoch too.

Shitting on rallies this hard. I guess all those early Nuremberg rallies were failures too aye moishe

I was at Cville, and was convinced less than a week afterwards that it was a bad idea.

The goon march model of activism is a dead end.