Race as Family

>I would argue that the more instinctive an action is, the more necessary that action has been for our survival in the past / more it reflects the natural order.
Interesting thought, probably true. If so, our raw emotions are tremendously useful tools for discovering truth.

Not boomers.

I maybe should have been more outspoken on this before, but because we are all racists here I said nothing.

You are exactly right, OP. Family was both the foundation anf catalyst for my ethno-political views. Growing up as a large, tightly knit family we were a nearly ideal microcosm of National Socialism, I just never saw it until I became wise. I had taken the first step naturally.
And the day my brother needed a titanium plate to assist facial reconstruction- that day I started hating niggers permanently.

I'm raising my 6 children properly. You'd be proud, they are beautiful beyond words.

Tribe is a big family, ethnic group is a big tribe and race is a big ethnic group, the problem is:

We have to recover proper words first.

You're a hero. I'll try to catch up when I get a wife.

Related to this is Telos, which is the sense that things have built-in purpose/function, the eyes obviously have the function of sight ect. Sexual desire then has the function of reproduction. Dysfunctionality can be defined as any behavior that supplants or makes non-functional an otherwise functional thing. Homosexuality is the replacement of the child-creation instinct, and is thus dysfunctional. If human societies wish to continue existing, it is paramount that we recognize this distinction, and enforce it to maintain health and natural order. Many other examples could be given of functions and dysfunctions, but we are all familiar with these things.

Thats the plague of "we are gods" rationalism.

I empathise with your brother and family user. I hope justice was served.

I want to believe. That really is the dream. Give me a good wife and many children, and a plot of nature to raise them on, and i will want for nothing on this earth.

What if homosexuality has a negative function? Like maybe there's something else wrong with homosexuals that homosexuality is there to put a stop to.

I'd probably not be as single-minded today if it had. Police "investigation" was worthless.

Just make sure to never relax and give an opening in the first place.

Selfdestruction / suicidality might plausibly have an evolutionary function, just as cells selfdestruct if they are damaged. This could, in an evolutionary context, account for foetally hormonally damaged or disrupted individuals, incapable of fulfilling the function of either sex.

But that they recruit otherwise healthy boys, and that they spread disceases to the healthy population, would rather seem like something a parasite would want, e.g. gay germ theory.
Gregory Cochran seems to be relevant in that - and the racial - context.
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregory_Cochran

No need for a counterargument attacking from a different angle, their claim is demonstrably false.
Even people you aren't directly related to carry a large % of your genes. By helping people of your own race, you help ensure the survival of not just their genes but some of your own, this is selfish gene action.
So even a sterile man can pass on some of his genes by assisting others of his tribe. A non-White has much less in common with him genetically, therefore racial loyalty makes sense genetically, it only stops making sense when you put it over a smaller group of of your kinsfolk. The child before the cousin, the family before the tribe, the tribe before the race (people from other tribes who share your race.)
Putting race before family is completely retarded because the very thing that's supposed to be preserved (genetic closeness) is greater between your family members than strangers of your race.
This is why telling Brit and German Whites that it doesn't matter about their jobs being taken by White immigrant labour is crypto-communism/crypto-civnat.