Haiti. Rhodesia. South Africa. The rest of Colonial Africa. All it takes is a lapse of will.
The 3rd worldization of LA
Blame government regulation and the car industry for killing vehicle design.
No.
White liberals without any skills or Mexican wives will starve to death, die in collateral damage.. or get mogadishued through the streets… imprisoned or genocided. The liberal women.. the lucky ones (aka hot ones) will become property of high ranking gang members… while the unfortunate ones will become comfort women and sold and exported on the world market. The nastiest of the bunch will starve with the Soy boys during the jnitial storm. However those few lucky soy boys who survive could easily be used as currency in prisoner swaps in the future. The blacks may be allowed to keep their shitty areas or driven away but have enough gang organization and weaponry to avoid outright extermination. It's not worth fucking with them.
As far as the world economy crashing I agree.. but Mexico wouldn't need a military force to annex California.. They already have loyalty and the citizenry in place.. and will be even more dominant after they consolidate power.
You do bring up the prospect of warlords which is legitimate as I doubt inner Mexican gang politics would halt as the power vacuum is filled. However the mexicans do have the potential to peace share given they are able to form worldwide criminal syndicates. They most certainly could divide California in a peaceful way.. eventually.
As far as the world economy yes you are right the fiat dollar literally controls the world. But in this world you don't need fiat to survive. You need food water weaponry medicine and numbers. Also keep in mind mass casualties will likely make population much more sustainable.
Whites will find it more difficult to control their areas.. at first.. as they lack the organized functioning street gangs as a banner to fight under. However one would anticipate local police forces and veterans groups diplomatically coming together to either export the urban gang bangers… or siege them until the inevitable search and destroy.
I would imagine all 3 societies Wil not be completely homogenous as you see groups such as Indians and other small groups who have had no issues integrating in to American society and tend to be useful as they are doctors etc.
After the scope of this is settled society will have use for any skilled workers and healthcare professionals.
Minorities in small communities regardless of the race will likely be accepted as well.. given they fight alongside their community.
And again, this huge part of the problem is downstream from immigration and has sweet FA to do with money supply or at least far less to do with it than with immigration does.
All it takes is being outnumbered 30 to 1, (((sanctions))), (((foreign interference))), (((UN))) a half baked militia and similar factors. Haiti. Rhodesia. South Africa. The rest of Colonial Africa were NOT white majority countries and miserably armed. I mean Rhodesians were like what, 3-4% of the population? It's surprising they came as far as they did with the little they had. In contrast U.S. and Euro-niggers are not more than 10% of the Population, the very opposite, while whites are armed to the teeth and in ownership of all the non-metropolitan areas too. Whites could basically kill off 95% niggers and spics without even firing a weapon by surrounding and closing off cities if they wanted. Civil war in the west wouldn't be civil war, it would be slaughter. The thing we really would have to worry about in a civil war is interference from Kikes, Russia, Chinks or South America, but not niggers.
My point is that "Mexico" is a political designation. Its a federation of states similar to the US with several different races living in it. The only thing keeping Mexico from having central america-tier poverty and violence like Honduras or El Salvador is American money and economic stability. The Mexicans living here likely don't care about what the Mexican government wants and likely will join with whatever cartel their street gang pledges allegiance to. Gangs aligned with Zetas will fight gangs aligned with CDG, JNG or Sinaloa. There is no unifying factor other than race, and even that is tenuous since you have lots of caribbean and central american hispanics living in the US, both of whom don't get along with Mexicans. This is why "Mexico" won't annex anything. It will likely cease to exist as a political entity in the event of a yugo style breakup of the US.
Sure.
Possible.
I don't think so. They'll likely flee to white right wing areas instead and cause problems. The leftist are too vain to understand that they are the problem.
I hope no one saves these libs.
Not really. Black gangs get most of their product from Mexican cartels and pill mills in the US. The Mexican cartels will likely be too busy cannibalizing the Mex govt and Hispanic areas to offer niggers too much help. The niggers can be starved out. The problem once again is white leftists trying to help their pets.
In North America and in the newly created war zones around the world, yes. But for the rest of the world, who will fill the power vacuum left by the collapse of the US dollar and economy? Euros might be tenable for a while, as well as whatever BRICS decides to be the currency, but the world will need a permanent solution. Its this solution that will shape the next 200 to 500 years of human civilization. But for about 10 years or so everything will be up in the air.
There are more white females in the service than all the shitskin males put together.
Checked