So … people have been saying "race war's a'comin'" since the nation's founding and it STILL hasn't happened?
Hilarious.
So … people have been saying "race war's a'comin'" since the nation's founding and it STILL hasn't happened?
Hilarious.
1. Select American leader
2. Search "was X a freemason" on google
4. Repeat the process with another leader
3. Remember that Freemasonry's plan for the New World (which it knew about in advance of Columbus' voyage due to their access to esoteric knowledge from previous eras, see Piri Reis map etc.) was the establishment of a capitol for the New World Order of Zionism
Now you have your answer
Jews are also good at external assimilation - adopting the dress, hairstyles, languages, and sometimes even the names of the locals. I say external assimilation, because no matter how much they're able to look like us and sound like us, deep down inside, they think of themselves as Jews, and only Jews, and their interests will never coalesce with ours.
Alternatively you can say it wasn't happening because whites still controlled the state but that they saw a time when white rule would be diminished and a race war would become inevitable. The term "race war" is kind of a silly word when taking the word "war" from its logical understanding as an event that's supposed to happen and then history moves on. Putting it in its continual form where live is a never-ending race war makes the term accurate as it is inaccurate depending on the phrasing. Same word games when struggling to point out genocide. People have an artificial perception of what is classified as genocide ever since WW2 and if they don't see that through the right lens like in South Africa they can easily dismiss it entirely despite the phrasing being correct. Both accurate and inaccurate depending on the context and peoples perceptions of the Age in question.
The race war truly began after the Civil War when the North imposed black rule on the South to degrade the whites in the region. Once you gave the non-whites that sip of power they've focused on our position in the greater scheme of things far better than we have, which is why you had blacks in the 1910's, 20's, and 30's talking about in the future blacks will rule over whites here in America. They saw things far more clearly than your white intellectual did who was too busy mentally masturbating his ideas while he was dominant unable to see his eventually decline. We're paying for it ever since.
When we compare the High Culture and Primitives to one another each forget the power of the other because they aren't in-tune with what they currently are not. The primitive never forgets natures instincts or the struggle like the high culture types often do. Like wise the high culture depends on their intellectual assets to constantly "save the day" so to speak when they run into very dire problems. The high culture usually wins but destroys itself in the process and has to start all over. Is this going to be a non-stop circular cycle or are we flirting with fate playing Russian roulette? How many times can we play this before finally realizing what needs to be done or getting wiped out?
FOUND THE NIGGER
Amen.
here's another good one
Lincoln advocated for this but he was assassinated shortly after the civil war.
Wow what a great quote! I'm taking a class where we recreate the constitutional convention of 1787 and I'm in charge of the slave debate. What would you guys so or do to convince the southern states to give up their slaves? I had ideas in mind that revolved around financial compensation.
pic related, I'm Roger Sherman, 3/5ths Compromise guy
Bring up the various slave revolts especially the Abaco slave revolt which started in 1787, the 1733 slave insurrection on St. John, and Tacky's rebellion in 1760. While you can't use Haiti's revolt as an example, you can look at the violence occurring between the blacks and whites on the island.