Questions that don't deserve a thread

Question, who got compensated for rigging the nomination process against Bernie Sanders?

Attached: efd7f9ad95fa9021a7852ff3a9761535b39a930257cc996b622e693a00e3daf5.jpg (1182x548, 91.85K)

Other urls found in this thread:

media.8ch.net/pdfs/src/1464900908929-0.pdf
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_legislation_in_Germany
twitter.com/AnonBabble

threads that don't deserve a thread: this one

Has the CIA ever done something good?

We can't know. We can theorize using the phrase; "cui bono" "who benefits"

Obviously the main person to benefit was Hillary, and therefore, Hillary's backers.

Beyond that we cannot say. You should further ask the question about Seth Rich's assassination.

Did Hitler really ban guns?
I hear leftists using this bit of rhetoric a lot.

Stop asking questions.

Bernie Sanders was compensated.

Some former military were allowed to own firearms. Guns weren't banned. Over there owning guns was a privilege not a right.

It's like the notion that the NSDAP burned books. They did burn books, but to quote wikipedia:


I wonder what books they banned…

media.8ch.net/pdfs/src/1464900908929-0.pdf

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_legislation_in_Germany

NSDAP gun regulations were generally more permissive than previous administrations. They were never as permissive as US laws, of course, because Germany had no real history of extensive civilian firearm ownership.

So, the Jew run Weimar Republic banned guns, and then Hitler relaxed the restrictions and no they kvetch about "Muh Hitler banned guns, goy!"

The Jew cries out as he strikes you.

For Christ's sake, it's generally useful for finding citations as long as you don't accept everything they say at face value.