This user is correct. This is in fact one of the central theses in Orwell's 1984 and one of my very first redpills, embodied by the philosophy of O'Brian, agent of the Ingsoc Party. To the Jew, truth is something subjective, something they can manipulate and control through public consensus.
————
O'Brien smiled faintly. "You are no metaphysician, Winston," he said. "Until this moment you had never considered what is meant by existence. I will put it more precisely. Does the past exist concretely, in space? Is there somewhere or other a place, a world of solid objects, where the past is still happening?"
"No."
"Then where does the past exist, if at all?"
"In records. It is written down."
"In records. And- ?"
"In the mind. In human memories."
"In memory. Very well, then. We, the Party, control all records, and we control all memories. Then we control the past, do we not?
You believe that reality is something objective, external, existing in its own right. You also believe that the nature of reality is self-evident. When you delude yourself into thinking that you see something, you assume that everyone else sees the same thing as you. But I tell you, Winston, that reality is not external. Reality exists in the human mind, and nowhere else. Not in the individual mind, which can make mistakes, and in any case soon perishes: only in the mind of the Party, which is collective and immortal. Whatever the Party holds to be the truth, is truth. It is impossible to see reality except by looking through the eyes of the Party."
————
As evidenced by , these people despise that their (((gatekeeping))) is being ruined by the decentralised broadcasting power of the Internet. They have had a near monopoly on (((truth))) for decades through traditional media; now the goyim are breaking their conditioning and it terrifies them.