The common approach of Holohoax skeptics is to dispute the official statistics, narratives, sources, etc. An avenue that is less often explored (except by first generation skeptics like Faurrison and Rassinier) is to point out implications in the official figures that are damning in/of themselves. Not that we shouldn't question (((official))) figures, just that there are problematic implications in the official figures themselves that get overlooked. Rhetorically, its obvious why this is not the most popular approach, ie, because it implicitly accepts the validity of the official claims. That being said, in some cases, it might be more subversive to accept the figures in order to point out their troubling implications, even just to make your Jewish opponent spin their wheels, or to bait them into disavowing their own numbers.
For example, reading through the (((Official Numbers))) of Jewish deaths during WW2, one might notice the conspicuously high survival rate of German jews compared to the global Jewish population. It seems that Jews had (roughly) a 70% survival rate, despite being sent to so-called "extermination camps". According to the (((official))) record, the survival rate for Jews in the German Reich was roughly 3/4ths, or 75% of the Jewish population who lived in the year 1933, within the Reich's eventual 1939 borders, before the outbreak of WWII (so Jews from Austria included). At six million of fifteen million Jews worldwide, this represented 2/5ths of the total Jewish population. So Jews in the Reich were 25% more likely to survive than any given Jew.
I'd say even though it was surely a lie, it's best to let them think you believe in it.
When you think about it they rely on their audience being historically illiterate since they sell the Holocaust as the most violent and traumatic event in History.
When even if it was real or not, as an event it isn't that big a deal compared to other attrocities - attrocities that happened in the exact same century that were far crueler and out-bounded the Holocaust in casualties.
Our best angle is exploiting how little of a shit the average person already gives.
Nicholas Nelson
Bump, I want some good holocaust facts
Nolan Smith
REMINDER People who outright deny the EVENT of the camps are alphabet spooks spreading disinfo to make you look like a fool in legitimate arguments. The actual death count of kikes by german hands is between 600k-1.5mil, which is less than what hitler allowed to leave to palestine before Britain sperged out and declared war. The soviets killed more jews than hitler but that'll never be kvetched about.
Ian Butler
Normies don't respond to this kind of autism.
Simple things like "Isn't it strange that it's illegal in many countries to discuss historical facts?" and "The 19 camps inspected by international observers were all certified normal prison camps. The 6 that the soviets didn't allow to be inspected are the ones claimed to be death camps. Isn't that odd?" are much more effective.
Tyler Ward
I like your approach + adding emphasis to the way jews have used their supposed plight to extort money from everyone while others silently move on with their lives.
The simple math of the Auschwitz numbers can't add up considering the length of time Auschwitz was allegedly operational and the number of ovens in use at any one time.
IDF shills attempt to get around this by claiming multiple bodies were stuffed in ovens at once (easily debunked with a picture) and that multiple bodies burning makes them burn faster, which contradicts basic science. As well as greatly exaggerating the length of time required to fully burn a body, also easily debunked through scientific fact.
If you know your shit when it comes to cremation, the holohoax will always be a joke.
Benjamin Perez
Much like the Holocaust, those people aren't real.
