Show Dogs Movie promotes pedophilia

Blame OP for being a colossal faggot who can't into making threads. The movie is literally conditioning kids to be molested.

Not just to be molested, but to smile through it the whole time.

wait wtf is this for real?

Dubs do confirm, this is real, and the normies are getting pissed. It's already been pulled from the for-kids lineups in several cities, though not yet pulled from theaters.

kids-in-mind.com/s/showdogs.htm

Editor's Note: An anthropomorphized police dog must go undercover as a show dog and in order to do so he must submit to the inspection and handling of his genitalia. The dog is very reluctant and is instructed to imagine his "Zen place" in order to get through the obviously distressing inspection. While these scenes are not presented in a sexual context, the implication of the character's initial reluctance and eventual submission is evocative of the concept of "grooming" that refers to a predator, specifically a sexual predator, establishing trust with potential victims in order to make them vulnerable and easier to victimize. The presentation of the dog's genitalia inspection as something he must get through, despite his evident discomfort and reluctance, has the potential of becoming an unwelcome message about limiting bodily autonomy and personal boundaries, especially for children and survivors of abuse. For a discussion about the concept of grooming and how it's presented in this film please see Macaroni Kid and For Every Mom. For a detailed analysis on what grooming is and how to protect children please see the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children.

Thread looks fake and gay. Turns out this movie really is trying to normalize molesting kids.

Are you retarded, user? That's the whole point of the thread.

ABSOLUTE WEIMAR

Ever since Obama got selected, I noticed the jews have been pushing sexual depravity hard, especially pedophilia and genital mutilation.

Attached: zionist-snake112.jpg (300x183, 42.14K)

Update: Movie being pulled from theaters and recut to remove scene.

deadline.com/2018/05/show-dogs-sex-abuse-controversy-film-edit-and-rereleased-1202396809/

Interested metaphor for fracturing of the psyche.
Abused children (and adults) often experience this kind of splitting whereby the ego (the aware 'you') retreats into an imaginary place while abuse is happening. This leads to multiple personalities over time, as the "created" persona gains strength and identity.
Supposed mind control victims call these different personalities "alters". Instead of thinking of the brain as a place where "you" live, think of it as an ecological space where multiple thought forms, all with their own hopes, desires and identities thrive and struggle for dominance.
It's possible for your mind to be taken over by a thought form you created to serve a particular purpose, while the "real" you gets imprisoned somewhere in the subconscious. This is why creating a "tulpa" is so dangerous. There is more than enough spare capacity in the brain for multiple people to exist.

What in the actual fuck?

PG = Please Grope

I get the feeling the scene in question doesn't actually exist and a fake script was leaked to dumb up controversy.

Trips confirm! PRAISE KEK! The Kikes have backed down, so now we must finish them off! DIG ALL ACTORS AND WRITERS! Force them into the shitstorm! Confront them on the topic on social media! FORCE A RESPONSE! They are left with only two choices! Openly support pedophilia and grooming, or openly condemn their own movie! Remember, by contract they can't take option #2 without getting sued!

Once again, kikes show themselves to be completely oblivious to the concept of the Streisand Effect.

Attached: ikoma-104.jpg (1296x1600, 505.18K)

Aren't all spics pedophiles?

Child prostitution is no fully legalized yet.

S-SHUT IT DOWN!

Vanity Fair compares pedophilia-hyping to food allergies:
From:
vanityfair.com/hollywood/2018/05/show-dogs-movie-controversy

is this really trying to be subversive? sounds like a dumb & dumber joke; it's only surprising this is PG

Yeah, I don't buy this thread's permise. The fact it's some user playing Chinese telephone with some Christian review for a movie he didn't see himslef isn't good evidence. Post clips of the movie or something.

USA Today a good enough source?
usatoday.com/story/life/allthemoms/2018/05/22/show-dogs-movie-grooming-sex-abuse/633324002/

okay, well considering this is a real practice for show dogs, maybe this was just the studio being a bunch of lazy fucks when the push out their crappy movies and didn't really think about the possible subtext, I think suggesting this was purposeful hasn't really been substantiated, and the studio already edited the movie in response

Retarded tinfoil-tier sliding bullshit

You people are worse than Anita Sarkeesian.

twitter.com/MovieDeputy
The article features a kike defending it.

Who wrote the script? I suspect it's some retarded nonwhite or a woman who didn't understand the implications of the scenario more than a deliberate attempt at normalizing grooming. The problem is that this shit got approved and nobody noticed anything. If you look at these bottom of the barrel kids movies you'll find a lot of inappropriate shit because the people who make them are retards. See the Plinkett review for Babies Day Out.

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (600x693, 228.45K)

It's being pulled from theaters and re-cut because the molestation grooming subplot is so brazen. The National Center on Sexual Exploitation released a public statement condemning it. How the fuck can you be on Zig Forums of all places and be in doubt that the kikes encourage pedophilia? Are you new here?

endsexualexploitation.org/articles/statement-movie-show-dogs-grooms-children-sex-abuse/

Attached: kikes.png (833x711, 206.39K)

If you haven't noticed, this thread is chokefull of shut it down/it's nothing/probably unintentional posts.
Just filter them.

Attached: ikomarina.jpg (733x1000, 98.91K)

Because you have to prove accusations as a fact, because I'm not insane? Well apparently they do do this shit with dog genitals during actually dog shows, so maybe it was just ignorance they were creating something with unintended subtext. They are editing it like you said. If it was purposeful, that wouldn't be the case because the movie was already MPAA approved and in theaters.

It's called critical thinking, if you can't argue your case under slight scrutiny, how are you going to convince nomralfags?

You forgot to report.

imdb.com/title/tt5691024/
Director is Raja Gosnell, writers are Botnik and Hyman.

Marc Hyman and Max Botkin. Tell me again they didn't understand the implications.

Attached: its all just a misunderstanding goyim.png (886x1390 72.96 KB, 79.28K)

Seems like a bunch of C-list guys. Couldn't find confirmation of any of them being Jewish, although Hyman sounds very suspicious.

Attached: 1462517291757.jpg (233x219, 19.41K)

NO! They do NOT do this shit in real dog shows.
PJMedia reports:

To confirm Peters' observations, I watched a few hours of dog shows on YouTube. At no time did any judge grab or fondle the genitals of a dog. They run their hands over the dog's head, neck, back and inspect the tail. That's it. There is no groping of any kind. Show Dogs' apology team is grossly mistaken if they think people are just going to believe that groping is what professionals do. There are literally thousands of videos showing otherwise. The below video shows judging starting around the 1:36 mark and the judge does not grab any dog genitalia. The closest she comes is a quick tummy rub and running her hands down the topside of the hindquarters. That is decidedly NOT genitalia.
pjmedia.com/trending/national-center-for-sexual-exploitation-calls-for-show-dogs-to-be-pulled-from-theaters/
So, It's blindingly obvious that this subplot was added by pervs, not dog experts.

Yes, this makes it hard to argue otherwise. I was wondering about the inspection thing during real dog shows.

They casted Rupaul a drag queen faggot who promotes child trannys as voice over who the fuck wants their kid to hear trannys talk? So that should give you a idea of what disgusting kikes made this. Everyone else in the movie is guilt by association they know exactly what they are working on and with who. So it looks like Shaq and creepy Will arnett are pedos.

Holy shit, the levels of "shut it down" in this thread are hilarious. Yes, it's a normal, but incredibly insignificant, part of dog shows. No, making it into the central plot device in a way directly mirroring predatory grooming techniques is not just an innocent mistake. Somehow Best In Show managed to pull off dog show themed comedy without teaching kids how to compartmentalize sexual abuse. Fuck all you kikes, people like me are coming for you and you'll never guess our intentions until it's too late.

Attached: oy_vey_the_goyim_know.mp4 (480x480, 861.77K)

Oy vey, underage goys need to be taught to not snitch and go to their "zen place".
What a powerful pozitive message to send to fresh me- er young people.

Of course the kikes in hollywood know damn well what they are doing. they are mostly no meme pedophiles that rape children, it’s imperative for them to normalize it so they can further the destruction of the society

Make a tumblr account and spread this shit there, argument being that it goes against 'bodily autonom' and 'consent', best case scenario it splinters the weimar perverts from the solely misguided youth in all the sjw groups. Protagonist is a nigger? Go spread it to BLM/Hotep groups.
Especially with its prevalence in Nickelodeon and other popular shit like that Smallville show (and that Avicii film clip), pizzagate needs to become a mainstream issue through all political sides.

user, see
IT IS NOT A NORMAL PART OF DOG SHOWS!

Kim would never allow a movie like this to be made. Why can't America be more tolerant of movies discussing Kim's status as a god? I would rather watch those.

Dubs will it!

Most adult prostitution isn't legal in the USA, either. Mostly just one or two counties in Nevada.

shaqs a pedo?

Wouldn't surprise me. Probably making all these "The General" commercials to pay for his lawsuits.

They're promoting dissociative states so people become better victims/puppets.

There was recurring panda symbolism found during the pizzagate investigation. There is also a picture of a panda on the wall (and inverted pentagrams on the curtains) in this scene taken from the movie "eyes wide shut".

Attached: eyeswideshut.PNG (869x473, 868.28K)

Alefantis etc did that "Panda Cult" thing too, and Seth Rich was supposedly a "panda lover."
I'm not sure what the actual association is but it's definitely something to do with childfucking considering who's involved. I think there's a Podesta e-mail complaining about "pandas" too.

They go insane from not being able to get past the panda and so they molest children?

The exact meaning of the panda symbolism was never ascertained but some speculated that it was to do with the appearance of a child after being beaten (black eyes). I don't lend much credence to this theory because it's based on nothing but speculation. The fact that they're trying to rescue a kidnapped panda in this movie is more than coincidence. Perhaps panda symbolism has something to do with kidnapping?

...

Attached: your_suffering.jpg (766x960 22.84 KB, 79.88K)

Spot the "lighten up, it's just a movie, it's just fun" oblivious goyim.
Every kike movie is subversive. Every hollywood movie is subversive. If you can't detect the subversion, that doesn't mean the movie is wholesome, it just means you're an oblivious normalfag.

Pandas only feed on bamboo.

By the way, the venue hosting the dog show is called "Mr Chow's"
so there's also an allusion to cannibalism.

0:16 in trailer, shot of Mandalay Bay psyop site.

youtube.com/watch?v=gHtbBsGdUgw

I'd fuckin go outside and check if a kike told me the sky was blue.
You idiot, everything they do is purposeful. You honestly think the propaganda arm of the establishment accidentally subverts our children? Kill yourself, retard.

Attached: kill yourself.jpg (300x358, 31.02K)

I agree, but I don't even watch movies to begin with. Why is this worth a thread? Does anyone here have children? Why would they let their children watch anything with Will Arnett? Why have a television in the first place?

1000 BTC a jew wrote this. It's classic kike 'humor'.

It was written by Max Botkin and Marc Hyman both of which are jewish last names. So Id say thats a pretty safe bet.

Attached: 1468071656184-0.jpg (831x1080, 150.58K)

Also he is literal giant and built like one so the nigger figured everyone looks like a little kid too him anyway. A lot of the women he dated were like 4ft tall.

The point is that it represents a new escalation in the attack against Whites. No one here should be watching television or visiting jew movie houses, but most of the goyish world does, and so do their children.
So the point would be to expose the contents of this movie to parents of its target audience, most of whom will have no idea about the movie's core plot device (it isn't mentioned at all in the trailer) and hopefully creating a scandal.
This tactic was somewhat successfully applied last year against the Nickelodeon show that was found to be promoting BDSM for children and whose writer turned out to be a pornographer.
Will the normalfags care? Probably not, but it still should be exposed to give them the chance.

So, uh.

One of the writers, Max Botkin, is associated with a videography company that a) works with kids, b) has international connections/bases, and c) appears to have operated completely off the books for its first 4 years, and has been only partially (i.e. not up to the legal minimum) on the books since 2014.

Now, it's not that I'm alleging that this company is involved in humyn trafficking in any way, but it does check all the necessary boxes.

And this isn't proof of "muh Pedowood" or whatever other ridiculous kinspeercy you stormderps have cooked up, nor is it proof of cannibalism, despite the company's name, so stop shitposting about both of those things. Especially, they should never be mentioned in connection with Daniel Max Botkin, President of Tasty Pictures Corp., based in Florida and Switzerland with legal representation via a Jewish lawyer in California.

Attached: Max Botkin's Tasty Pictures.png (678x160, 20.38K)

And just because the other writer, Marc Hyman, worked with Dan "I've Got A Great Place to Hide Hyr" Schneider, that also doesn't mean that Pedowood is real! So stop asking.

Attached: Maddow1482-3.png (248x298, 97.42K)

If the board wasn't so slow, I'd tell you to shoo shoo something jew… so why are you back now? What have you done with resurrected player?

Agreed. There is no j00ish control over the film industry, and there are no j00ish schemes behind movies. Just let this one slide.

So what if you think that:
I mean, none of it is true. Clearly there's nothing to this, and we can drop the matter entirely…right, boyim?

Attached: Maddow954-3.png (287x151, 41.17K)

Attached: 161d8d3d3e26eaafb43f4a201c96c8fe217c9de7726b0110d45f5bb28c007bff.jpg (353x251, 14.53K)

First you cry for someone with more IQ points than you to do the digging you are utterly incapable of performing (being an idiotic manpig), then once a strong, independent womyn delivers, you complain about that too? Manpig gratitude, lydyys and gentilepigs.
I never left.
Since I am not kampfy, or moonman, or even learningcode, I cannot answer that question; ask him yourself. He goes by "Heil" now, although when you address him, be sure to specify you're talking to kampfy in particular as moonman uses the account as well.

Attached: Maddow956.png (361x293, 137.74K)

Allway ewsjay illway ebay illedkay inway ueday imetay.

4/10, that's the best I can do.

Attached: Maddow962.png (828x464, 509.34K)

If you are real rachposter then, and not learningchode, prove your gender. What does your rach look like?

Reported.

Attached: bitchplz.jpg (485x364, 45.68K)

it was worth a shot.
So back on topic. Through what vector do we present the fat spic as a pedo that gets cucked by shaq?

These kikes have been amping up the depravity for years now. embed in point is an orgy scene in a kids movie.

Panda= two black eyes?
Also, wasn't that babyfurfag republican intern that got caught trying to fuck a kid a pandabear? web.archive.org/web/20100522013020/http://www.toobroketolaugh.com/panda-suit-and-a-bag-of-penny-candy/2009/06/01/>>11608423

Zig Forums ate my image

Attached: AlanPandaGear.jpg (640x480, 31.03K)

The movie played in theaters and OP's link is a mommy blogger movie review you fucking kike. Idiot or shill, you don't belong here.

Now this is quality Rachposting I can get behind.

That wasn't a kids movie. It was degenerate but not a kids movie.

Attached: 65f5e20d0240a2b059cedb6df645bd61def1244fdb73d3b93f0f1d072be5d1e2-pol.jpg (768x1024, 50.25K)

Q predicted this

Attached: 50_shades.jpeg (1024x427, 44.98K)

Kike writer shifts blame:
edition.cnn.com/2018/05/23/entertainment/show-dogs-controversy/index.html

The perfect grooming video.

Attached: 857.jpg (256x324, 21.16K)

Made for adult children, but correct.

oy vey clearly the book "an empire of their own: how the jews invented hollywood" is an antisemitic canard!

the rabid antisemite Gary Oldman quoted this antisemitic canard but we forced that bad goy to apoligize!

Attached: quote-within-the-studies-and-on-the-screen-the-jews-could-simply-create-a-new-country-an-empire-neal-gabler-100-39-50.jpg (850x400, 72.74K)

I believe Michael Jackson called that "Jesus juice".

However, by being cartoon characters, it will (likely has) be used for grooming.