Libertarian White-Nationalism

I don't see why a healthy and homogenous state would not just gravitate towards this naturally like the Greek city-states.

Make it white libertarianism then. White individualism. Not like shitskins can handle it anyway.

Democracy and freedom as understood by the ancient Greeks was only attainable through a homogeneous society. It wasn't up until Anglo puritan ideas infected it that freedom meant brown people

You have to choose between individualism and nationalism - hedonistic jewish utopianism and your race's survival.

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (666x1025, 1.11M)

The USA is US-Gay. It's build on degenerate Enlightenment "values".

No, like any other country, that's the result of subversion. America was founded inherently white nationalist and the fascist bundle of sticks goes back to the founding fathers.

Let's throw down. My greatest personal criticism of libertarians is that they they allow for depraved behavior that greatly harms the individual, and additionally damages the society they are living in. The libertarian claim that this is purely at the expense of the individual choosing such a lifestyle is false, as no man is an island, and what a man does affects not only himself, but the people and society around him, regardless of whether or not this is his intention. Libertarianism from my standpoint neglects the importance of setting barriers and boundaries on personal liberty once it is taken to the point of self destruction and depravity, and the cost this has on society. At the very least our society is stripped of a man that might otherwise have been a benefit to his people if he was given structure and purpose, rather than simply tossed into the deep end and left to swim or sink. National governments should seek to cultivate their citizens and citizens should seek to cultivate their nation, and both ends of this pact should hold each other to this mutual responsibility.

Attached: The Decay Of Society Due To Individualism.jpg (1774x1602, 523.94K)

You mean like Thomas Jefferson signing a law to have gays castrated while he was governor of Virginia, or George Washington having a man hanged for draggng the flag through the dirt? Another typical "not the jews" (((1))) and done post from the goonsquad.

What "natives?" You mean the nomadic Asian tribes that were grazing the wilderness we found when we discovered the new world? They made it very clear they are not suited to civilized society, they were given opportunity after opportunity to coexist with us, but all they wanted to do was scalp and eat our children every time we turned our backs. Best solution would be to send them back to Asia or deport them to some friendly country that would take them like Bolivia or something.

The alternative form of libertarianism doesn't exist. The very profit motive inherent in libertarian economics demands that I undercut some of my neighbors and attempt to compete them out of business. Communal bonds are severed in this way. Walmart is a great example of what happens when a successful business in capitalist economy becomes so successful it utterly destroys the cultural integrity of a region's economy. That is to say, economies that were previously dominated by small local businesses, run by neighbors and family, catered to the populace, put out of business in the name of free market competition. In order to prevent communal bonds from severing in this way, you're going to have to make some collectivist concessions, and if your goals are nationalistic in nature, those concessoins will have to be along fascist lines. At that point, your system ceases to be a libertarian one.

So I'm not sure what you mean when you advocate for "white nationalist libertarianism." It simply sounds like you want fascism but with all the cultural markings of early America, like the Bill of Rights. That's still not libertarianism.

Libertarian ideas can only exist in a white society without Jews. Jews cannot be expected to adhere to contracts. History has shown that before. Only whites have the high IQ and consciousnesses to maintain a free society. Libertarians that ignore race, IQ and history are no better than communists who also enjoy the same things to keep their ideology alive as reality seeks to spite it.

Attached: 2f1665a5a2498bc1905b8a864411ab4a9f15d00e4da659c4a2290f4640562f13.jpg (608x588, 55.88K)

was doing pretty good until the civil war wasn't it…

Just about any system of government will fall to Jews. The only solution is to gas them.

A Civil War was inevitable from the start, the executive branch, itself, was mainly championed by jewish slave Alexander Hamilton. Centralizing power grabs will always take place in libertarian societies until all the liberty is squeezed out of them for the benefit of those in control. In fact, they will take place in any society, so, therefore, it's important, you, as a nationalist, are the ones in a constant struggle for that power, as a matter of defending the nation itself from subversion.

Isn't this a totally different topic? Related perhaps but I think this is quality bread

Attached: ohthisagain.jpg (600x900, 64.74K)

Interesting never thought of that. Basically like the terrorists in Gaza. Fucking Hamas….

No offense but the south was just as jewed, had a jew vice-president who was an agent of british jews and ran away to Britain with a lot of southern gold

oy vey

Congratulations on making the most meme ideology in existence.

Attached: you.png (1190x906, 178.45K)

In a completely white, homogenous society Libertarianism would work. But due to various (((globalists))) this is impossible right now.
Let's form a white unity, gas all kikes, hang all traitors, genocide jews, decapitate Muslims, take over all aforementioneds' lands, then we can have a Libertarian utopia.

You could have a White Nationalist nation with libertarian leanings. I suppose a white ethnostate would naturally lean that way. In terms of gun rights and get off my lawn sentiment. But the underlying hyper individuality is a cancer. It eats at a nation. Self-interest outweighs national pride and a sense of duty. Conformity and morality are subverted for trannies, faggots, and female empowerment. It would all be a balancing act between interests of the state and interests of the people. But it all starts with getting rid of the Jews. Once we remove that parasite we can begin to recover and start the balancing act.

Attached: 6yxjWF2ePL9s_640x360.jpg (640x360, 42.45K)

Jews bankrolled the north and the south, it led to a mass slaughter of young white men, the bloodiest war ever on American soil. After the Republican party completed their complete military takeover of the government, they then began promoting jews into positions of power in the banking industry and local government, they gave niggers the right to vote, and began opening the floodgates to immigration, with any opposition to these concepts already slaughtered.

It's besides the point anyway, the main point is that libertarianism fails to organized power grabs, and there is nothing within libertarianism to protect the society from that sort of thing. All the solutions are fascist in nature.

LIBERTARIAN
IS
JEWISH
No, fuck off with this retarded shit. have we gone back in time three years to when the National Socialists had to relentlessly browbeat you lolberg dribblers?

Technically it would work if somehow all ethnics (nonwhites) disappeared and only whites remained.

No, "technically" it wouldn't work as outlined in this thread.

it also filled up.

In response to the posts in the previous thread:

He's infringing upon my free speech by demanding I adhere to Marxism. I have to defend my freedom, user. If my neighbour wasn't making these demands of me, there wouldn't be an issue.
No, I'm defending those things by exiling someone who's trying to enforce their ideology, in this case Marxism, on others. Again, it's a question of coercion.
Then people have failed to propagate and defend Libertarianism effectively in this case. But you're forgetting that subversives are usually only able to subvert as a result of limits placed on what we can say and propagate back at them. I don't believe ideologies like Marxism are capable of surviving scrutiny in a genuinely a free society. That's why they're only surviving on nanny platforms like twitter now or authoritarian hellholes like China.
Well, we've already covered the fact that subversion is a form of violence, but in the case of depravity: by remaining vigilant and countering it through ways and means that also don't violate the NAP.

Plenty of Libertarians would agree with this.

Last thread died.

So where were these official policies that were put in place to make NS Germany an ACTUAL "jewish esoteric" state like you claim? Economical, social and military impact?
Care to cite every single one of your source then? Can't just post names of a book then tell people to go read it. Especially publication from 1892, when Hitler wasnt fucking born.

Like I said, typical dumb smelly lolberturdian scum. All your shit just proves that only liberal retardation like yours were banned :^)

Of course, you can't prove anything. Subhuman scum.

some ideas are compatible. for example free trade, but only inside of nation

...

futarchy, baby

It's literally just acting as a Libertarian with an ethnocentric outlook to the point where you, via freedom of association, self-segregate in all white communities. It's not that much of a meme.

BUT YOU ALSO DEMAND HIM TO BE LOLBERG YOU DENSE FUCK!
As long as the marxist isn't shot the moment he opens his mouth, it is game over for your society, as the common scum gather to his cause. Then you get tsar'ed.

But if you preemptively strike him like Germany did Russia, there goes the "NAP".
Everyone was telling that in the last thread. Get it through your fucking head.

And "subversion" can't be defined as violence. If you do, then there goes muh freeze peach. And Nixon and McCarthy were definitely NOT lolberg.

What the fuck is wrong with you retards?

Nice try kike. Palestine might be a meme nation, but a nation nonetheless. They occupy the place ever since the kikes got kicked out, then came the allied "liberation" of the world with a piece of paper that say kikes can now have their land. Which turn to be over 3/4th of the originally seized land.

Israhell fiasco is literally the best weapon against the kikes right now. Only the most braindead zog and boomers think it is justifed.

its like you dont even want to explore the universe with other higher races that hid in agartha

I think the easiest way to answer this question is can the constitution (which is very libertarian in nature) survive unchanged in a far right nationalist society? I think when the question is framed that way the answer is yes. Let’s remember things like racial segregation, making communism illegal, trade tariffs, and banning an entire religion are or were legal until kikes infiltrated. The real takeaway here is that kikes and all other non whites can not exist within a utopian society.

But reality obviously doesn't function the way you frame the question. Freeze peach is always the first to go. It is always up to the leadership to manage and find the equibrilium between liberty and duty.

Lolberturdianism is just a product of kike mindfucking and slave mentality inherent in the common rabble of any race. The Master shapes the rules and envisions the world the way he wants. Slaves are passive. Lolberturdianism is passive.

And that has nothing to do with good or evil.

No, I don't. We're living in a Libertarian society in this hypothetical. If he doesn't like that, he's free to fuck off to another society, or at least present his differences of opinion in a manner that isn't subversive. Not hard.
Marxism can't survive free enquiry and scrutiny, mate. Stop demonising commoners by assuming they all want to be Communists for some reason.
I was arguing with one person while others were giving their overall assessment of both ideologies. Don't flatter yourself.
Free speech doesn't go out the window. Quite the opposite, in fact. If they're trying to subvert by proselytising their ideology, to the exclusion of all others, and this individual or set of individuals is then exiled or dealt with because of this, I am literally upholding the right to free speech.
They don't have to be to support my argument concerning subversion functioning as violence, you dense fuck.

*blows apart your skull with an AR-15 for daring to infringe on freeze peach*
Don't tread on me, you boot licking fuck. Go get sodomised by the king of England if you love your masters so much.

No, they cannot. Classical liberalism is the moral justification for the rise of Jewish power and teaches a burning hatred against Germanic tradition for limiting the supposedly almighty power of the self-indulgent individual. Pre-revolutionary America did not even believe in any sort of freedom, although some of the social experiments that happened there were just as awful. Libertarianism is a major reason why America has such a bleak outlook for the future, it diverts all possible resistance to what is happening and turns it into childish posturing. It breeds sedated pseudo-men who think that their most important task right now is to deride foreigners for lacking America's worthless and ineffective first and second amendment "rights".

If these so-called rights really had the amazing effects attributed to them and America is still going down the drain at present, then it would only prove that American men are the worst men in all human history and certainly unworthy of admiration or emulation. Victory will only come by breaking and destroying the enemy and his laws, not by reinforcing the moral justifications used for fragmenting and destroying us! That is the basic mistake of the American cuckservative. White libertarians are cuckservatives.

Define subversion then. And please show us all how words and speeches can be "violent", and how to handle that without destroying your freeze peach.

But they fucking did. In America, even after McCarthy and Nixon!

And they and most Zig Forumsacks think you are retarded. It is obvious though.

As long as they don't fire the shot until they gathered a few millions to their cause to rape you later, you can't do anything without bastardizing your "NAP" and freeze peach.

Of course. You have no argument. It can't be done. Words and actions are always seperate. It is the basis of your freeze peach.
You smelly dumb retarded lolberturdian scum :^)

You are free to try and justify classifying words as speeches as violence though. And shitting your pants at it.

This is your definition of freeze peach and "liberty".
WEW
E
W

Attached: smug whore.jpg (300x169, 12.7K)

Oh, not just the basis of freeze peach but of all laws.
Not even the commies define speeches as "violence". They didn't need to. In fact, all states that ever existed never had to do mental gymnastic like this.
Only "hypothetical" ideologies burn the mind of their retarded followers, therefore not manifesting itself as any geopolitical entity, ever.

Are lolberturdians going to argue that pirates followed the NAP too, lol!

I think our residental lolberturdians are just emotionally invested in this bullshit. Consider how they wasted their youth for impotent Ron and his cuck son Rand. And how some fat fuck degenerate ruined their convention, and a literal kike advocating the destructions of family with "defooing".
Top Kek.

There was one in the last thread who literally admitted to supporting an SS equivalent to stop subversive marxism. Some of them just don't want to admit that they agree with us.

It is the one I'm talking to. I will admit that I'm no advance thinker but I'm confident enough to know what is "right" and "wrong" according to natural laws.
And lolberturdianism is just completely retarded from my perspective. Nobody will ever adhere to NAP. Especially since our beloved retard wants to define "subversion" as "aggression", therefore shit all over his principles. If he does that, then every business transaction in his fantasy will be casus belli.

Fuck these retards.

An attempt at a hostile assumption of power via espionage, criminal action and a gradual indoctrination of a people. I shouldn't need to explain how espionage and criminal action are inherently violent behaviours. As for indoctrination, if you're attempting to present your views - be they feminist, communist or whatever - as the be all and end all, and you demand that people accept them, this is authoritarian. This is essentially intellectual violence. Violence needs to be met with appropriate force. Hold whichever fucked up ideas you want, but, if you attempt to proselytise and make demands in a Libertarian society, you can expect to receive a reprisal. This does not go against free speech, rather it upholds it. I'll say this again: bad ideas can't survive scrutiny. The only reason modern societies have been successfully subverted is because there are life altering limitations on what we can and can't say - who we can and can't call out. The answer is to fight for upholding freedom, not to deprive ourselves of yet more rights in the hope that some nationalist daddy figure will come and save us all by telling us who to shoot.
The common man hated Communism - "better dead than red" was an extremely common phrase to hear throughout the western world at the time. You're thinking of the American "intelligentsia."
Rude. But I expected as much from a whore.
They'll be cast out or in a body bag before they can book their first book club meeting. See what I said about subversion above.
Are you so autistic that you can't take a joke? I mean, you post smug anime faces when discussing politics, so I wouldn't be surprised.

Yes and prior to the enlightenment it was the norm that rights of citizens were given due to nationality. The "universal rights of man" was the cancer the drove to destroy nation states. You can have an all white democratic/republic country.

It destroyed and continues to attack it's opposition when it was subject to fair Inquires it was eradicated.

1.Subversion doesn't work with truth around and freely available, look around you the jews grip is failing thanks to the internet.
2.McCarthy's briefcase Ketchup commies were lies, Nixon did something he shouldn't have, hell the entirety of the US government was blatantly corrupt and gave commies a talking point at that time (not to say they aren't corrupt now but it was a shock at the time).
3.Most Zig Forumsacks are stupid and/or larping as evidenced by your next point.
4.That goes for every political system you idiot, though I'll take the system without witchhunts thanks.
5.Try something other than shitposting and you might have a point.
6.Apply the 2A's
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED, PROTIP THIS LINE IS NOT FOR HUNTING
to the 1A or equivalent, because once again you can't subvert with the truth around and freely available.

One more thing, either the political system is so good people stick to it because they want to or it get's bucked off, history has shown this as well over and over again.

By this logic cultural Marxism should not exist, yet it does, and is in fact growing. Face it; your average person is uninformed, even if the info is free.

Wouldn't that be called Libert-Aryanism, op?

The problem here is that most dont seem to recognize the flaw with libertarianism is inherent to libertarianism.
Its very permissiveness is the problem. That doesnt mean that we should live like slaves, but such concept as 'freedom' and 'liberty' can only exist and function within the context of reality/natural law.
Eg: Trannies are objectively a perversion of normal healthy sexual behavior. They are insane and tolerating them, making them normal, is to pervert our ability to recognize and act in accordance with reality/truth ourselves.

But libertarianism cannot stand against anything if it doesn't interfere with personal freedom and the NAP. It doesnt see a problem so it has no defense against perversion and degeneracy.

The basic impulse underpinning libertarianism is actually quite decent. Respecting others boundaries and personal choices and not being a hyper aggressive prick are good things.
But they can only function well within the normal limiting factors of life that we evolved to contend with. In the past we had to struggle and fight as a matter of course. It was normal, because struggle is fundamental to life, and life taught us to be hard. These decent attitudes that underpin libertarianism were put into perspective and could function well enough. They helped us to create high trust societies, it helped that we were racially homogeneous, too.
But as we have become more materially affluent, with fewer immediate brutal struggles in our daily lives and crises delegated to professionals (or at least people pretending to be) our natural inner drives to respect each other and not be a dick have become grotesquely exaggerated into this libertarian, permissive filth with little limiting factors.

Where does this take us?

Even without jews and other non whites, ALL sufficiently affluent liberal, permissive societies will spiral down into degeneracy and decay over time because they lack any internal world view that allows them to continue to function in a healthy, sane manner in the absence of the immediate imposition of ruthless Natural Law. Its inherent to libertarianism.
What is the solution?

1. The Amish.
Deliberately regress to a materially more primitive state in order for the simple, healthy mechanisms of Natural Law, of real life, to put our exaggerated and perverted drives into proper proportion once again.

2.National Socialism.
Make Natural Law (along with Nation and Strength) the basis of our world view. To make our morality out of Nature.
To internalize Natural Law not only as Reality but as Truth and Morality.
To become an avatar of the universe that has become sentient and make our Nation and ourselves a manifestation of its Morality.

The first option is at best temporary. We will find ourselves here again sooner or later.
Only the second option allows us to not only survive but thrive as a sane, whole, healthy people.
Only with the Truth of National Socialism can we explore the Universe without being a plague of perverted locusts and a sickness to every world we set foot upon.
Every civilization before us has faced this test.
Every civilization before us has failed one way or another.
Will we be the first?
One thing is for sure: Libertarianism, self indulgent permissiveness, feckless hedonism, prudishness, denial of life and its natural healthy process is not the answer.

Attached: 589269.jpg (1758x2474, 686.08K)

With violence or without?
What are "criminal actions" that can break freeze peach without violence?

They don't have to anymore. After the good old days of shooting degenerates were over, the plebs voluntary join such movements. I know. I'm stuying on campus in a small town. No pressure, they do it anyway.

AHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
IT KEEPS ON GIVING!!

Back to reality, retard. A natsoc state can be made with total violence right now and survive through enforcement ala Gestapo.
You CAN'T as a lolberg.
."bad ideas can't survive scrutiny"
But they do. Just as faggotry and sluts have for as long as history, so have communism and "enlightenment" for their entire existence.
Only 10% of any population is needed for total take over, this is a common lolberg talking point, yes. And the numbers of degenerates nowadays? Uncountable.
So either you herd them to camps like the SS would have or you risk being surrounded by being passive slaves, chained to "NAP".

By herding people to camps and destroying any facade of "NAP".
TOP KEK

Didn't look like it back in the 90s and 2000s, much less now. You lots are even more entrenched in your basements than I thought.

TOP KEK
What a weak insult. Must be some retarded basement boomer that the kikes fucked over. The damage from the mindfucking is properly permanent though, teehee.

But they haven't done anything wrong, and the way you do it you don't even have evidence to accuse them of conspiring against the state YET TOP KEK
Like I said, the NAP is completely retarded. You are like the atheists. Completely beholden to a dogma, not being able to criticize it.
Unlike what most of you retards think, if tomorrow there is 100% accurate evidence that Hitler was actually a kike shill and Germans fought for nothing, we would turn our back on all that we defended for decades.

But you, the "champions" of "liberty", can't even begin to criticize and deconstruct a retarded principle made by Stefan Moneyjew, a literal kike. You are shitting your pants right now.

Just NAP retribution, LOL!

Attached: laughing whores.gif (1920x1070, 2.26M)

When was it eradicated? It is pretty damn strong in America. I have never seen people prosecuted for criticizing Marxism in free nation. People often mistaken SJWs laws for that.
Marxism plays the right tunes and make the common scum dance to its music. All the base instinct and lower emotion like libido and enviness.
It will never go away I fear. And left unchecked, well you have the "Russian" Revolution.

Failing like how? With Trump and his kosher "global nationalism"?
The Jews are still ruling and any solution to remove them will make the official Holohoax story looks mild. Which means shitting on NAP :^)

So you mean commies prospered and survived when freeze peach was still uphold by a huge swath of the population?

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHA
LOOK AT THIS SUBHUMAN SLAVE AND LAUGH
Typical lolberturdian. Absolute retardation.

But the 2A is seperate from the 1A. They are sepertate :^)
Might have to write a new constiution that define words and bookmeets as violence then.

Lady and gentleman, the lolberturdian animal. Look at it and laugh.

Attached: kek.jpg (318x159, 4.8K)

The founding fathers were free Masonic weirdos who fucked their mulatto slaves. Prove me wrong.

*Envy
Oh look, trying to talk to a retard drops my IQ too. :^)

friendly clarification user:

1600s - 17th century
1700s - 18th century
1800s - 19th century
1900s - 20th century

Not how it works buddy. They were masons yes. Likely fucked boys and niglets, yes.
But you make the claim, you prove it.

Truth is the best policy to achieve Liberty.
A truly free society will protect Truth.
Democracy as we have seen rarely even considers Truth.
By means of free association of white people and a common goal of preserving Truth, Liberty can be secured under an all-white nation state without any initiation of violence.

Religiosity for the most part has been stamped out of regular people. An atheistic authoritarian state is destined for failure. A new myth central to the society must manifest in order for prolonged stability. The deferral of violence/NAP can perhaps be a part of this new myth if the concepts of Generative Anthropology are fleshed out more and become more accessible to the layman. With this accessibility, a more spiritual nature of man may arise. Generative anthropology should provide a proper amount of secularism to entice those with a scientific interest, but it will also provide a rational basis for which a spiritual belief may coalesce.

The ideal white nationalist

Attached: thomas-jefferson-sally-hemings.jpg (700x410, 56.43K)

Kek, that is new. Not an amerimutt though so obviously I missed that.
White supremacist indeed lel

**America was a mistake. Had it not destroyed Europe in both great wars I wouldn't have thought about it more than a big Brazil.
But now the mutts have the full capacity of how much I can possibly hate.**

Nigress did look hot though. Would sterilize and use as sex toy.

Attached: nation of subhumans muh hwhite brothers.jpg (595x605 217.62 KB, 371.92K)

Any kind of mingov ideal only works in an all white world. In reality Libertarianism and White-Nationalism are incompatible. Weak policies and a "just leave me alone man" attitude will always fail against those with strong convictions and a desire to use the current system to further their own goals. We have seen this with the left taking over every institution. This is why Zig Forums mostly abandoned all minigov in favor of Natsoc and similar ideals and moved to try to co-opt the Republican party rather than going 3rd party after the Ron Paul failure highlighted this glaring weakness.

What the fuck Zig Forums

Yes Fascism and libertarianism are coherent and in fact libertarian-ism necessitates fascism as an endpoint. If you were to somehow magically implement the NAP then you'd still end up with fascism dominating through voluntary association because unity wins over disorder.

Furthermore there is a hierarchy of freedoms. Life > property > association > everything else. The right to associate is primal and necessary to any human happiness and this again will result in ethnic conclaves that approximate national socialism.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans-Hermann_Hoppe

Hoppe on Why Democracy Fails: youtube.com/watch?v=hUzkZaD1xDs
Hoppe on realist libertarianism: youtube.com/watch?v=EO68Kvb9fD4

Checks out

Almost forgot

What the fuck are you on about? Stealing is still stealing regardless of whether or not it involves violence. Libertarians believe in laws other than those that simply look to punish violence, dipshit.
Champagne socialists from some two horse town are hardly a fucking threat, mate.
Laugh all you like, it's a very real concept. The rest of your post consists of either fantasising or is straight up incoherent garbage. Please try harder the next time you want a response.
I've explained numerous times how what they're doing in this instance constitutes an act of violence.
Who? What the fuck are you on about now?
XD epic

The colonies started in the 17th century. In fact, 17th century US colonies were superior to 19th century USA.

Stay mad and mutt. Bitch to the turkroach about it.
We will never forget 1945.

Bitch
Mutt
Nigger

Please elaborate this.
A bookmeet is equal to stealing under NAP now or what?
People meet, exchange idea, not harming anything directly with violence, yet.
Laying a hand on them means bye bye to freeze peach and NAP.
Smelly dumb lolberturdian scum :^)

Not your m8, loser. And champagne or not, they provide fund to antifa and the real grunts of communism.

"Intellectual violence" isn't even defined, you absolute retard.
Go shit your pants harder.

Show me the damaged property and bodily harm that occured during this Marxis bookmeets at 9pm inside a house please.
You can't? Then no violence occured.
Still wanna gas them?

The ancap kike that came up with NAP? How ignorant!
I know it is Ayn Rand
Funny how all prominent ancap and lolberturdians are all kikes

Of course. The master is better than the slave that waits to be slaughtered.

Attached: fb2dfb69b98e217734de63f10f6a6f66cd5b4abceaae24952ebf5bb5d456c397.png (560x560 213.99 KB, 265.87K)

What does it say about you that you got beaten by a nation of mutts?

lol retard.

Not much. A lion can get eaten by 10 hyenas or niggers.
Do we aspire to the lion or the 10 niggers?

psssh

Attached: american_nationalism.jpg (675x507 27.44 KB, 22.78K)

What? You're honestly arguing with yourself at this point.
Fund your own right wing organisations in response. Oh wait, you can't because of restrictive policies from an authoritarian government ;) Weird that, huh?
I spent half the last thread defining it, you utter mong.
Not all forms of violence are physical.

He was saying that white Americans are and were mutts.
His memory said "muh nation of subumans muh hwites"

Then he's wrong for using 56% memes. That said, it would be nice to keep European breeds separate within Europe.

*Meme

You got beat by amerimutts and half Asiatic Russians. Cry moar

Did you fry your brain is the question.
When no bodily harm or damage to property occured, there is by the definition of violence itself, NO VIOLENCE.
And if no violence occured, you can't keep the NAP or freeze peach intact when you starting shooting people that didn't do any violent act.
You brought stealing into the context of this discussion, not I.
Like I said, you shat your pants.

Thats why Hitler and 7 men turned the table over. Here is the thing. They didn't cuck out with muh NAP.
:^)
In fact, there hasn't been a lolberg state ever. Never will be. I know that we had Hitler. You? Just servants to authoritarians for your idols.

You haven't defined it unless you can put it into formal terms like kike Ayn Rand did for NAP.
Go ahead, you might make history.

AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
SHEEIT NIGGERS WE BE SHOOTING PSYKER POWER NOW NIGGERS
CHOW MAYNE NIGGERS WARHAMMER 40K

Can you shit your pants even harder for all of us to see?

youtube.com/watch?v=9liNFMOyN_c
Enjoy victory.

You do know I'm just shitposting right?

Attached: 000_JJ7EI.jpg (768x511, 82.39K)

Imagine actually taking the time to type this out… and you have the audacity to claim that others are shitting their pants?

Anyway, the literal definition of violence includes: "strength of emotion or of a destructive natural force." In other words, no, it doesn't have to be physical. It can be intellectual, much like in the example I provided of the Marxist professor. This gives the NAP a lot more to work with than you boot lickers care to admit.

I know what you are going to response to the "violence" part.
But a private marxist bookmeet not on your property will never be considered "violence" by any definition.
Pants shitter.

Our autism and superiority to the mutts say that I can't perceive lesser jokes from mutts
:^)

Oh here it is! Checked.

As in exortion and control, back by physical violence. Which means all violence is linked to physical forces by nature. A scrawny kike faggots can "mentally violate" you. Indeed. Because he is protected by the mutt state.

And as said above, private marxist meetings not on your property can and will never violate your retarded NAP, Mr retarded pants shitter.
And no, striking my keyboard for 5 seconds isn't bad. Crying about muh mental violence like a bitch and thinking it isn't just a branch of real physical violence is pant shitting.

Attached: vfg.jpg (500x554 192.98 KB, 436.8K)

No, as in "strength of emotion" period. You don't get to arbitrarily add bits to the definition to better suit your argument. By the way, your grammar and spelling are awful. Are you Indian by any chance?

:^}

Attached: brandenberg-gate-in-netanyahu-tweet.jpg (600x450, 35.5K)

You can't even define strength of emotion, retarded subhuman scum.

How will a private marxist meeting on private property and peaceful marxist gathering apply "strength of emotions" on YOU? And it is not "period". You can't just quote the first page result of Goolge and call it end all.
Only a retarded shitskin would do that. Which most lolbergs are LOL! Not to mention that Oxford also has another version, not Google!
"Strength of emotion or of a destructive natural force." It is the second definition.
All first and main definition means physical violence.

By your subhuman logic, right now I'm mentally raping you, you no argument monkey.

Nah. Can't be a shitskin when my grandpa fought against "liberation" and communism. Unlike yours.

Amen brother, posting some quote images for those too lazy to watch your videos.

Attached: How_to_respond_to_Paul_Krugman__Hans-Hermann_Hoppe.mp4 (736x446 75.39 KB, 82.41K)

Hey look, it's your grandpa

Attached: foreign-soldiers-german-nazi-army-wehrmacht-ww2-second-world-war-amazing-incredible-dramtic-pics-pictures-photos-image-georgians-azerbaijan.jpg (422x561, 41.67K)

And if we were all to adhere to YOUR definition of violence, you monkey, it would be world star hip hop every day just by staring incorrectly at another person. You make a person feel bad. NAP broken. Bang bang.
See how that runs, monkey?

:^)

Attached: American_races.png (1366x4038 1.24 MB, 1.35M)

:^}

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 10.82K)

Oh, how cute :^)

Attached: Whites of America nation of subhumans.jpg (599x818, 161.53K)

"hurr… you can't even provide definitions of definitions of definitions!" This is just more cyclical bullshit and ad hominem. You have nothing of value to say.
That was done for emphasis; I'm not saying it's part of the definition… You take things so literally, you must be a legitimate retard.
And the second is just as valid as the first, you stupid fuck.
I can guarantee my family did more to undermine Communism than yours ever did.