ITT: Scientific racism

Racism is a completely meaningless word that must lose the power the left has given it.

bump

Call them facts you faggot

Racism is not a meaningless word. If you have two equally qualified job candidates with the same culture, personality and characteristics and the only difference between them is their race for which you prefer one over the other, then you are racist. If you consider someone eternally inferior by sole reason of their race in spite of their personal achievements and character that is racist.

Posting this here on this board and trying to explain is perhaps a meaningless task though.

race is a proper taxonomical category in of itself, one tier below subspecies and one tier above strain.

Also the new science is epigenetics and environmental influences on genetic expression. It's not as though you don't interpret genetic studies to suit your preexisting biases anyway.

epigenetic changes aren't heritable, and are not passed down to the organism's offspring though. they're not what you think they are. if you think you can wrangle pseudo Lysenkoism back into the public discourse under the guise of epigenetics to curtail the public's rising consciousness when it comes to genes, heritability, and the race realism that follows and all that it implies, you are sorely mistaken.

you're better off lobbying for "restorative justice" when it comes to genes, ie genetic engineering and eugenics for all and for free. to help the disadvantaged non whites of course. your ilk will do 180 on race realism once you figure out how to actually solve the problems that arise from it so quickly your head will spin, i assure you

Epigenetic changes are inheritable though.
learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/epigenetics/inheritance/
sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/03/160328133534.htm
And I'm not arguing for there not being racial differences, I'm trying to inject some critical thinking into in what way environment, stress and epigenetics might have affected the results of genetic studies. Arguing denial of some degree of genetic determinism when I acknowledge and point out epigenetics isn't a logical train of thought.

I recently ran into a lib argument I haven't encountered before which said that the cause for racial iq differences can't be genetic because anything that could have caused such selective preassure hasn't been there long enough to cause that much evolutionary change? Any counter?

Yeah, just remember that AltHyp is an open sodomoite.