Fucking Weimar all over again

Fuck off kike.

Attached: 1528234343820.jpg (494x561, 44.05K)

Not only OP is a faggot who should be permabanned simply for loving cocks, but his first pic is also fake, the sandnig didn't marry the girl,she cried because she forgot to recite a part of quran or something and was sad because of it.

look up jim goad

...

What I mean by this is that there is nothing worse than a retard with a gun. SocJus and NatSoc both hate intelligent people with a vengeance.

Degenerate boomer americuck who will be killed on the day of the rope.

Americans needed to kidnap natsoc scientists in order to get to the moon because liberal Americans were too braindead and retarded to do it.

So why the hatred against OP?

There are several posts on the board right now that explain the difference between right wing Zionist Jews and Left wing Marxist Jews, and why both are ultimately our enemy. It's merely a dispute about the best way to exploit the Goyim. Jewish Supremacy is deeply rooted in Judaism itself.

It had indeed, but it's making a huge comeback, because even when they had it so good, the parasite couldn't help but attack the host as always.

Yep. That's why the Jews are destined to perish, because the meritocracy practiced by National Socialists is ultimately stronger than the nepotism and kleptocracy they practice.

This is a bait thread. Examine the writing style - it is engineered.

Newfags who replied:

Sage, report, filter. You're too smart to fall for this shit. Shape up or back to halfchan.

Attached: download (2).jpeg (228x221, 8.3K)

OP here
Hitler initially brought back a radical form of völkisch that sought to destroy what the leftist, selfish elites of Germany had caused.

A economist by the name of Hjalmar Schacht became Hitler's appointed minister of Economics. He was known of having great friendships in Masonry and Jewish financers. He succesfully and methodically saved Germany from the fringe of annihilation and civil war, during the Great Depression.

It was known as the German miracle amongst many, that Germany stood by itself even with other nations collapsing.

Politically, Hitler pursued actions to destroy the sheer degeneracy and chaos of Weimar Germany, which were met with success and cheers.

Following this, a series of political disputes between militaristic Rudolf Hess and Hjalmar Schacht, because Hess wanted the armamentation and preparing for war. Schacht refused to abode this, instead trying fruitlessly to make those resources work for social programs. At the end Schacht lost and quit, claiming of being sure of another war in Europe.

The extreme rise of völkisch, didn't just bring morality but also diverse superstitions to the front of Nazi philosophy. Thule Society, initially a radical Rosicrucean Mason group that studied Luciferianism proposed things such as Hollow Earth theory, Ice covered atmosphere, the descendance from Atlantis semi-gods.

The Invasion of Russia, the development of innefective paranormal weapons, the deadly late usage of V2 rockets where all determined by astrologic reads.

Rudolf Hess, third in the Reich, parachuted himself onto Scotland following a British covert operation to forge astrological reads and convince him to jump because he was supposedly to convince the British for peace.

Racial theory, mainly supported by Himmler, didn't only want the execution of Jews, but Slavs, Swedish, Anglish, Italian and any group that wasn't 100% Germanic. Of course Himmler hated much more Jews than those others, and preferred to use them as useful tools.

At the end, Hitler commited suicide om April 30, 1945, in Walpurgis nicht eve. Walpurgis, the most holy rite after Halloween of Satanists and pagans was described to bring resurrection in the afterlife.

Like how could I convince faggots like you
Muh 6 gorillion
The oven dodgers
Hillary is a worthless saggy-tits prostitute
The Democrat party is a money-grabbimg scheme.
Faggots should be used to experiment instead of monkeys

Pic related

If I was a paid low-life pawn, would I be fired by saying these?

Attached: 1528569307332.jpg (594x515, 19.04K)

Attached: 1432015932783-1.png (397x406, 164.72K)

Is there a bot that spams 4cuck threads here or is this op really just that gay?

Holy shit that reddit spacing
okay 6/10 troll

No. We end you. We fix our shit. Rebuild our nations, without you.
Then we fulfill our potential, inherit the fucking stars.
You're just a lesson we needed to learn.
That we're too fucking nice for our own good.
Consider that lesson fucking learned.

*Two Steps Pic relevant.

Attached: Jew-TheRealWhitePrivilage.jpg (730x447 313.94 KB, 116.78K)

Remember when we didn't have trash threads like this?

I can't help but laugh at civic nationalism - its a self-defeating meme.

Look at the US.

We hear civic nationalists talking all about these Constitutional principles that they hold dear.
Freedom of speech. Right to bear arms. Limited government.
Yet these same civic nationalist principles, they claim, demand judgement on the basis of the individual only, not as collectives… Of course, their claims are somewhat suspect, given the men who derived those princples initially were slave owners and created the US as an explicit White ethnostate, but whatever.

The point is, this hyper-individualistic outlook forces them into a cognitive box, limiting the extent of their philosophical-willpower. It does so, in that it forces them to reject judgement in the context of racial groups as a collective, despite races acting as collectives.
For example: Hispanics support gun control (60%+ in favor, 30% against). And hate-speech laws (50%+ in favor, 25% against). And expanded government (70%+ in favor, 20% against). And Hispanics overwhelmingly identify with the left-wing political parties (60%+, increasingly from generation to generation after entry to the country to upwards of 70% by the 2nd generation). AND Hispanics demonstrate an elevated fertility rate relative to White populations in the US (still above replacement levels).

Thus, by upholding civic nationalist principles in judging Hispanics as individuals instead of as a group, many Hispanics would be (and have been) allowed into the country - for example in the amnesty of Ronald Reagan - despite the fact that collectively they do not believe in the principles upon which the nation was founded… Not that they would say as much if attempting to gain entry - deception exists, and civic nationalist arguments as-goes vetting procedures are underwhelming, nevermind the prospect of enforcement of civic values after entry (let alone over generations).

And this last point about enforcement is important, because evidence suggests that, like most ethnic/racial minorities in the US, Hispanics do not demonstrate a collective belief in the civic principles of the US (certainly not to the proportional degree seen in US Whites), but they DO behave as a collective, supporting left-wing political groups in overwhelming majority. Those promoting civic nationalist ideals do not demonstrate the philosophical-willpower to enforce these civic values, have offered no methodology to alter this condition, and all indications suggest they are bereft of such a method - if they were not, the populations which have been in the US for several generations, exposed to the values of the country and civic nationalists' arguments in that vein, would espouse those positions, but they do not.

While on the subject… Why do Hispanics support left-wing groups? Are they actually more left-wing in political view? Yes, but that's not the whole story - they vote as a collective, and they do so to serve collective interests. Left-wing groups in the US are the groups in favor of serving the left-wing predispositions of Hispanics (hate-speech laws, gun control, expanding government with more programs) as well as increased immigration, which they promote loudly, and increased immigration leads to an increase in population for the respective ethnic/racial minority in question, which in turn leads to an increase in the political power, electorally at the very least, wielded by that ethnic/racial minority. Hence, regardless of their political stance, Hispanics support left-wing groups as a collective to serve collective interest. We see the same sort of behavior on behalf of Blacks and other non-Whites.
In fact, we see the same sort of behavior on behalf of Asians, who also primarily support left-wing groups in the US (50%+, increasing generationally), even though polling of their political views suggest they may not actually be left-wing politically - they're merely acting as a collective in serving their collective interest.

Attached: 8ecc9933eb963b7012f36c132721736240be8c6a8691b7746b38e1040ebd38c9.png (6552x2176 933.92 KB, 2.03M)

Left-wing groups are, for whatever reason (ideology, personal desire for power or wealth, etc), very happy to assist in this endeavor, and in fact, the left-wing political party of the modern US is an amalgam of minority groups acting collectively in their own interest despite an absence of shared political belief betwixt the tribes. They are, effectively, a collective composed of collectives, each acting to serve their own interests, and a great deal of their effort is maintained in securing each individual collective's support and avoiding conflict among those groups where their perceived collective interests conflict. Further, these left-wing groups - aided by left-wing political/social organizations (several particularly influential examples bearing an overt Jewish composition or philosophy) - explicitly advocate for, and support the explicit advocacy of, the respective non-White minority collectives, whilst simultaneously doing everything in their power to silence, slander, demonize and deplatform any and all explicit White advocacy groups through accusation of association with 'racism', 'White supremacy', 'Nazism' and/or 'anti-Semitism', amongst others.

That is to say, the left-wing in the US, particularly the influential Jewish wing, advocates against explicit White advocacy. Which is why no such explicit White advocacy organizations exist in the US today which are not so slandered, and certainly none which exhibit institutional power and perceived legitimacy as might be claimed on behalf of other ethnic/racial groups' equivalents (the latter of which often exhibiting a far more seedy character than the former).
Ironically, this seems to form a neat little circle for the left-wing (especially Jewish) actors: by advocating against White advocacy and White advocates using accusations such as 'racism' or 'White supremacy', Jewish left-wing organizations create anti-semitic sentiment in White advocates and White advocacy organizations, which those same left-wing Jewish organizations then utilize to further slander them through accusation of 'anti-semitism' or 'Nazism'!
Its important to note that the left-wing political factions and their accomplice political organizations in the US also employ such accusations in opposition to any efforts to inhibit left-wing political aims at increasing immigration into the US from non-White sources, promoting globalist multiculturalism and miscegenation, and degrading national borders, even national sovereignty.

Attached: 2016 Election.png (2200x6992, 1.07M)

The left-wing has been so successful in their efforts in this regard, that the US population demographics are beginning to disintegrate. The White population - the only population which demonstrates anything close to majority support for the ideals which civic nationalists claim to hold most dear - is being displaced.

What conclusion do we reach from such analysis of circumstance?
We can discern that the civic nationalist position is philosophically-unequipped to combat this hazard, in that their civic nationalist ideals demand they make judgements on strictly individual grounds such as to ignore ethnic/racial behavioral trends. They will thus seek to argue in favor of judging a long line of individuals, as individuals, on principle, who can and will present themselves as sharing a belief in the principles civic nationalists claim to seek to uphold if such is required to gain entry to the country, and who will subsequently act collectively in their own interests once in the US such as to create new demographic conditions within the US that are no longer fertile substrate for the individual - and thereby societal - espousal of civic nationalists' proposed ideals.

Attached: Carefully Trained_ Cultivated Conscience.PNG (970x732, 118.04K)

tl;dr: Non-Whites don't care about civic duties or virtues, they act as collectives to serve collective interests, and civic nationalists do not have any mechanism at their disposal to change, nor combat, this state of affairs, even as they vehemently protest, on the basis of their civic nationalist principles, White advocates attempting such a feat. These civic nationalists are thus demonstrating that they are operating from an obsolete playbook, attempting to espouse civic nationalist ideals of individualism that were only able to be maintained in homogenous White nations bereft of competition from myriad non-White collectives (each serving their own interests), and yet, despite this failure, demonstrable throughout electoral politics in the US (and the West overall) over the last 30+ years, civic nationalists continue to suggest the old playbook is valid. The conclusion is thus that, if civic nationalists are allowed to attempt to carry out their proposed policies in the US, there will cease to exist a substrate for civic nationalists' beloved Constitutional principles and these principles will cease to exist in application in the US. Self-defeating meme.

Attached: Founding Fathers.jpg (1240x1870 1.25 MB, 3.48M)

...

Finally, I'd like to sink one last nail into the coffin of civic nationalists' hyper-individualistic ideals, specifically surrounding the conceptual notion of individual judgements in the context of immigration.
Regression to the mean.
This is a well-documented phenomenon in population genetics whereby the offspring of outliers within a population tend to gradually 'shift' toward a state more in-line with the average of their ethnic/racial group. The result is that judgement of individuals is an entirely static exercise.
Typically, those promoting such a methodology of selection will dictate a set of standards which are non-biological in origin, but which effectively act to indirectly ensure that only the outliers amongst non-White ethnic/racial groups will be able to gain entry. Of course, this is innately faulty in practice, in that the individual's offspring are not necessarily going to espouse the traits which meet those standards, particularly if the individual being judged initially was an outlier amongst their kind, which will be the case by-requisite as regards non-White ethnic/racial groups, yet those offspring will be granted voting privileges if born within the US.

Attached: Sides Died of Overly-Activated Almonds.jpg (561x558 1.06 MB, 174.8K)

Attached: Cuckservative Traitors.jpg (1976x4788 6.62 MB, 3.69M)

Thanks for confirming you are a shill with your copy paste straw man, the go to shill response every single time.

>sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016028960600033X

>www-personal.umich.edu/~negisama/asdf2.pdf
Jewish white boys’’. This is the Bachman (1970) study in which the number of Jewish boys was 65.
>In the (((Herrnstein))) and Murray (1994) data set in which Jews obtained a mean verbal IQ of 112.6, the sample size was 98 and was not drawn to be nationally representative.

>This is Backman’s (1972) analysis of the data in Project Talent, a nationwide American survey of the abilities of 18 year olds carried out in 1960.
>The study had sample sizes of 1236 Jews and 1051 white gentiles (in addition to 488 blacks and 150 Orientals).
The existing state of the research literature on the IQ of American Jews is therefore that some studies have shown that their verbal IQ is about the same as that of gentile whites while other studies have shown that it is considerably higher at 107.8 (Backman, 1972), 112.6 (Herrnstein & Murray, 1994) and 112.8 (Bachman, 1970).
>However, the last two of these studies have sample sizes of fewer than 100.

same, they're addicted to bluepills painted red

sorry, but I cannot hate modern-day pioneers trying to build a better future for their families.

same, they need a genocide because they gave wymyn right and enforce gynocentric laws

I hate neocons worse, because all liberals are the same… aka marxists.

Attached: ♥ con pito.mp4 (651x400 793.14 KB, 39.59K)

dubs confirm
traps > women

This.

He never said shareblue you faggot. The OP is writing in a style indicative of a shill/bait thread. The use of conflicting terminology like "cuck" from the right and "stormfag" from the left.the thread boils down to an attempt to create a hodgepodge grey area shitpost in the vain of an ancap civcuck nationalist in a cringey "contrarian of contrarians" way.

I meant to sage fml tbh fam

Second picture is incorrect due to failure to understand plain English when reading the sources. If I wanted retards I would go to leftypol.

Attached: jewish jew.png (602x264, 52.25K)

You are either a fool or a shill.
Lurk more and read something

Jews lie about everything.
Indeed, the talmud tells them they must lie whenever it helps jews or hurts non-jews.

Personally, I'd be fine with quarantining them in israel and banning them from any involvement in White countries forever. But White countries must be ruled by nationalistic Whites, not jews and traitorous shabbos like they are now. (and who are destroying those countries rapidly)

The ongoing White genocide must be stopped. The only way to ensure that White people have a future is to have White countries for White people and only White people. If you want "diversity," then go to Brazil, or Mexico, or any number of such places. They are plenty diverse. Yet people like you just can't STAND any country being for Whites and only Whites. Even the IDEA of it is hated by you people.

Who/ what defines what "merit" is?
Currently it seems to mean something along the lines of soulless sociopaths who value nothing above profits.
Without a moral framework and a "higher standard" meritocracy rapidly becomes oligarchic despotism in which most people are slaves.
I choose the Volk.
Within the framework of "supporting the health, happiness, and strength of the Volk" meritocracy is very useful and valuable. But there must always be a moral framework to drive society in a positive direction, not a negative direction. A better future for the Volk and all that.

The vast majority of spics are not White.
And they never will be.

White nationalism or White genocide.
Pick one, White man.