"Just won big Supreme Court decision on Voting! Great News!"

"Just won big Supreme Court decision on Voting! Great News!"

What did he mean by this?

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (320x68, 11.89K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Husted_v._Randolph_Institute
supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-980_f2q3.pdf
supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-980_n6p1.pdf
cnn.com/2018/06/11/opinions/supreme-court-makes-it-harder-to-vote/index.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Maybe the Ohio law where they're now allowed to delete voter registrations if the people don't vote for 6 years?

I know a DACApede that asked the same thing.

Its this. Problem is it isn't country wide.

I presume you mean the law allowing them to delete voter registrations isn't country wide? Supreme court decisions are binding on all U.S. courts.

Election really only comes down to a few key states, Ohio being one of them. However, other states can use the SCOTUS ruling as precedent since we live in a land where case law reigns.

see

a thread died for this
What has happened to this board?

Voter ID laws

Supreme Court rulings set a precedence for law throughout the US.

Further dig into the case and you will find the real victory is that Supreme Court ruled in favor of voter registration, IE: Identification necessary at time of vote.

No more dead people, no more illegals, no more kikery.

PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!PLEASE BE VOTER ID!!!vvv

Wait what are they trying to hide?

Put more effort into your shit.

Deleting or shelfibg and archiving? If simply deltion then someone is covering tracks that should be investigated

The decision is irrelevant unless the other states all have similar laws. If they don't, the registrations aren't deleted.

What a waste of digits

You're wrong.
We're not talking about state elections here, we're talking federal.


Sieg Heil

Attached: hitler1.jpg (217x287, 9.83K)

KIKES BTFO

If they delete records from Obama's and prior as per the six years then fraud cannot be investigated? The records of fraud need archived not deleted. Then mass executions of fradulent voters can commence. And they must be executed. They will be NFL niggers of course.

It's not irrelevant. States like Florida and Ohio are "swing-states" but they always have a ton of republicans in their state government. This allows them to clamp down on invalid votes in important states. Although I wonder what authority the federal government has over state's voting laws. If they're allowed to prohibit people from purging derelict registrations then couldn't they force people to purge their voter registrations?

Or this?

Attached: No-bel-Un.png (798x531, 1.22M)

This is the case he's referring to

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Husted_v._Randolph_Institute
supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-980_f2q3.pdf
supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-980_n6p1.pdf

OP is a low effort faggot

it was about the Ohio thing. they upheld it by a 5-4 decision

archive.is/bxI1c
cnn.com/2018/06/11/opinions/supreme-court-makes-it-harder-to-vote/index.html

Attached: cnn_scotus_ohio_upheld.png (1032x946, 386.52K)

Jesus christ, is CNN able to write anything without injecting their shitty statements masked as opinions?

That's their Opinion section, Einstein.

Oy, it's one (((man's))) opinion goy!

This is a big win because other states now have the green light to do the same. It hurts leftists because they rely on dead voters and frequently-moving minorities to win, so they're opposed to it. I haven't read the dissent yet, but since I know it was joined by Ginsburg and Sotomayor. If It's Ginsburg, there will be a very well-written, impeccably sourced explanation for why the law doesn't actually matter. If it's Sotomayor, there will be a vague and meandering emotional appeal with little or no legal citation except for what she imagines her dream Constitution.

It's also a principled decision. Voting should be easy, but not free from safeguards against fraud or even unintentional voter registration errors. Votes count less for every instance of voter fraud.

I posted links to the actual case, guys. Don't read stuff through a kike media filter, it's bad for your blood pressure.

There was already a thread, I'm just here to kick jews in the teeth.

Seig Heil! Heil Hitler!

Fuck voting because you gave non-whites and women a right to vote. We can't get real voting back til we go back to super white majority and no more votes for non-whites.

Fuck it, let's do it Heinlein's way, voting for those that served, extra votes for those that were Mobile Infantry. Let's make the majority of the world white and hispanic or other names will just be a regional thing. Then civnats can have their way, but the world has to be white first

Or we could just repeal the 14th. Hell, Repeal everything after the 10th.