Do you believe genocide is generally effective strategy? I've seen NatSoc anons who believe it's not the right way to go about it, but kampfy liked to delete anything that wasn't "GAS THE KIKES RACE WAR NOW", as actual discussion was non-kosher, so maybe now we can have an actual thread discussing the pros and cons.
Personally, I don't think genocide is the right answer in any case. Even in the most extreme cases of the most undesirable forms of life humanity has to offer, I believe it's better to let nature take its course and just wall yourself away from the cancer rather than trying to cleanse it. Instead, it's better to strengthen yourself, your community, and your group - let no "backdoor" exist, and allow no traitor to infiltrate. Then, let any parasitic groups naturally die off.
There's also the practicality aspect - it's very easy to kill a lot of something, but nearly impossible to kill all of something through artificial selection of any kind. The only real effective examples of extinction in the history of life on Earth has always been natural selection. I think that the status quo know this, too - hence their efforts of a less-direct form of genocide, but instead trying to "phase out" ethnic groups (IE: Europeans) through intermixing, cultural deprecation, specific assassinations, et al. It's easier to boil the frog slowly, essentially.
Humans killing humans is still natural selection you underage faggot. Do your 2 years before posting.
Parker Kelly
Alright, but how? Like, how would one go about exterminating an entire ethnoreligious peoples who pride themselves in subterfuge and obfuscation? also jews are the best examples of a people who have committed genocide, see second pic in OP
Olmecs died out in a similar way to shitloads of other indigenous peoples in the Americas - they fucked themselves over via over consumption and refused to adapt.
I disagree, I think sentient species have vastly different capabilities and considerations than the rest of nature. This applies to both the humans doing the killing, and humans being killed.
Landon Watson
Guns , fire , bugs and bombs We have race specific microbes that would get like 95%. The remaining five percent could be boated out to sea and , you know, scuttled and shit Kikes don't float Genocide is a great idea. Less than 500,000,000 all white worldwide population is perfect No shitskins , no kikes , I'll have a coke
Grayson Ortiz
What board were you browsing he was a hardline anti racist. You weren't even allowed to say nigger by the end of the era and there were stickies about based Steven Miller
Conventional warfare is exactly the kind of shit that doesn't work on its own, although Sounds interesting. Elaborate? I can't imagine much beyond general biological warfare (IE: plague/pestilence), which would do more damage to your own people, I would imagine. Source? I've heard of some madmen trying to develop such for niggers, but I didn't think you could specify it for jews or the like, too.
