Three people in a polyamorous relationship recognized as legal parents of a child in Canada

Three people in a polyamorous relationship recognized as legal parents of a child in Canada

A Canadian court has declared two men in a polyamorous relationship with a woman as legal parents of a child in the first such case in the country’s history.

The Newfoundland and Labrador Supreme Court came up with a ruling in April, but it was only publicly announced last week. Canadian law recognizes polyamorous relationships, but bars bigamy and polygamy, in which the same person is involved in several marriages.

“Society is continuously changing and family structures are changing along with it,” Justice Robert Fowler wrote in his decision. “This must be recognized as a reality and not as a detriment to the best interests of the child.”

The trio from the city of St. John’s have been together for three years, the Canadian Press reported. The woman in the polyamorous relationship is the mother of the child, who was born last year, while the father remains unknown. The family members haven’t been identified in the decision.

The family went to court after Newfoundland and Labrador provincial authorities refused to grant all three of them parental rights, saying that only two people can be listed in a birth certificate in accordance with the Children's Law Act.

The Supreme Court judge acknowledged the argument, but said that the Children's Law Act, which was introduced three decades ago, couldn’t match the “now complex family relationships that are common and accepted in our society.”

rt.com/news/430125-polyamorous-legal-parents-canada

Attached: 5b27db4cfc7e93ae3b8b4578.jpg (900x506, 78.98K)

inb4

inb4 woman divorces both men and collects full sized child support payments from both

this was the big idea all along tbh. The social role of men is now completely obliterated, which means we have nothing to lose.

Seriously, if that's not the ultimate proof that we now in a matriarchy, and that polygamy is normal is a regular patriarcal system, then you're nowhere close to anything traditionnal. Just yet another atheist claiming to be conservative, not having a fucking clue about the reality and deepness of the valors defended by tradition.

polyandry is traditional alright- in paleolithic and Mesolithic cultures, like Jews before civilization existed.

Humans are never naturally engaged in polyandry. I know of some bird species that do it, but no mammals. Not that polygamy is any better. It's only acceptable in times where there are far more woman than men, maybe due to a recent war or famine (where women and children are fed in priority to men). Otherwise you destabilize society and men without women to take care of and knock up with children don't give a shit about anything (see Neets and MGTOW).

...

...

Canada is not a serious country.

Attached: 1d039a532c08d5e6473d3e6c68038280d1bc7d3c20650d4b4f67aa50ebe22a50.jpg (258x330 96.76 KB, 46.27K)

Civil marriage is just a corporate merger.

I know of a few witchy cults that do this, but that's because the soyboys are all low-t potheads. It's really something to watch. These women shriek and hide when an alpha comes on the scene.

Damn, this is depressing to read. Is nothing sacred anymore? Shit like this should be illegal

Attached: 15A94729-3155-4709-9C4D-C75EBF30C5AC.jpeg (600x596, 163.14K)

This country disgusts me more and more every day.

Attached: Ifonlyuknewhowbadeh.jpg (539x500, 59.22K)

Reminder that ever since the Conservatives got ousted they haven't spoken about the Founding Fathers, not even fucking once.

It's been shown beyond any refutation that a father and mother is the optimal environment for a child's wellbeing and later success in life.

Polyandry is not traditional.

Men need verification that they are the father of their child. A woman knows definitively that she is the mother of her child. That is why one man two women works but one woman two men does not.

Bingo

this

This. Not to worry though, only shitlibs and their beta counter parts will support this. The rest (even non whites) will mock this mercilessly.

society destabilizes itself, an overpopulation of beta males leads to the destruction of mens firm grasp of rule.

By “they” you mean the Liberals, right? And did the Cons really talk about the Fathers!

plot twist, one of them is Brendan Fraser
>>>/just/

Attached: Brendan Fraser life is fucking pointless.jpg (358x350, 47.2K)

To this from fucking dogs and what else. My my Canada should not be allowed to exist. It is a threat to the civilised world.

Yout can't fuck dogs, only suck them off, no penetration. You DISINFO SHILL :^)

It is illegal. The article explicitly says that the judge overrode an existing law preventing this situation because of muh progressive society. It's a great example of why unelected (((judges))) shouldn't be permitted to (((interpret))) a country's laws rather than merely enforcing them to the letter.

Oh, well that makes it MUCH better.

That woman is a fuck toy for the 2 faggots. No straight men enjoy each other's sloppy seconds.

And since this relationship revolves around sex - any children they have will too. I'd go further to say that it's probably their main motivation for wanting kids at all.

Also . . . why would they stop at 3 partners??? There will probably be orgies and wild parties in front of the kids.

Attached: org01.png (331x694 60.51 KB, 145.27K)

Could it possibly be that they were always right?

Try name something that hasn't been exploited by kikey filth, then you will learn that the collapse of civilisation is our next best bet.

Whether or not this was the cunt's plan all along, this is going to happen. I can't wait to see how this is going to pan out. Probably in a good ol' quadruple murder suicide.

Attached: Louise Pratt (Labor)

If your military force is solid and loyal it doesn't matter what oppressed people think and want. Just beat them into submission.

Attached: 6356345.jpg (630x420, 78.01K)

They don't enjoy but scarcity of pussy may force them to make compromises.

This or at least the richer one to force him to pay alimony while the not as rich one is the father and they knew all along.

Once again, these degenerates are running for offices unopposed because good people are afraid to run againsts them. You want change? Run, lie to gain favor then hitler 2.0 time.

Three fathers!?!? That boy is gonna be a real man when he grows up. . . . If he grows up . . . fuck it

Wanna bet this isn't actually an equal polyamorous relationship, but 2 straight men, one is a cuck, one is a bull?

I doubt the common people accept degenerate stuff like that. Even if they say stuff like "I tolerate it", I bet they make fun about faggots and cucks like that behind closed doors.

So can one have a polyamorous relationship with women and just one man?

Polygamy means "multiple partners", due to how things work in normal world it's basically synonymous with polygyny - multiple wives, which is natural, because high quality men are sought after by multiple women, and if a guy's quality is high enough, women will compromise with each other just to get a chance at carrying his seed.

There are three woman for every single man.


Or just tell the truth because you already have faith in the ideology of National Socialism to be universally regarded as the correct way, and understand that confronting the opposer with ideological debate will bring truth and reason in the end anyway. Just rebrand the ideology; Hitler went against everybody in power and eventually won because he was right all along.


That's called polygyny.


The population ration of men to women is 1:3. There should be three women for every one man demographically speaking.

What fucking planet are you on, retard?

So Justin, his wife, and their bull?

Attached: castreau's greatest fantasy.jpg (680x644, 77.21K)

Attached: Canada Imam.jpg (600x357, 15.66K)

More like that boy is going to be molested until he's 14.

It's okay. Here's what we need to do.

First and foremost, stay strong. The weak men will start to kill themselves due to the inconceivable depression that will strike at the realization that men are being supplanted in almost al domains by women in the professional workforce, and that women are being brainwashed into believing that men are worthless. This is the farthest thing from the truth, and every woman realizes this once they hit the mid twenties.


Second, the abortions will skyrocket, and women will prefer to have girls over boys. Sorry baby boys, you are going to get vacuumed out of the uterus. The male population will dwindle, and the new ones that do make it into the world will be brainwashed in their pre-k classes into believing that masculinity is a bad thing. They will wish they were female, the more optimal gender, and they will fetishize what they are not. They will become transgendered.

If you have stayed strong throughout these two stages, you are in good standings. While you are here, start exercising. Full fucking chad mode. Get big, cut, make something out of yourself professionally speaking. In no time, we'll have women flocking towards those who have stayed strong, the real men, the chads, and they will be quickly leaving the beta cucks who buy into this sick ploy at global dominatricism, get off on wife-sharing porn, and do not deserve to forward their genetic lineage. The weak men will die off. The ugly cunts will decay in irrelevance, and there will be nothing but strong men and the multitudinous population of women who choose the prime meat over the scraps.

It's 101 males to 100 females. 1.01:1
Nature doesn't like imbalance.
thanks to Chinese central planning, there's 120 men for every 100 women in China