There are various instances of different (((groups))) editing wikipedia to fit their agenda. I think we should have an editing session of wikipedia to drop little truths into it. As an example, modifying it to explicitly detail that someone is a jew or some kind of subversive, as an example, turn
into
Also, edit articles about the balkan wars, Rhodesia, South Africa, and other subjects towards a more jew aware perspective, or at least a more right leaning one.
pic is unrelated
Other urls found in this thread:
en.metapedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
ggwiki.deepfreeze.it
twitter.com
bump, sounds like a great idea
could gather some good wikijew salt as well
Agreed, sounds funny af honestly.
I think it should be better if there was a list gathered of articles or themes to target.
Sounds useless. Why not just improve upon Metapedia and fill in missing entries?
en.metapedia.org
Both can be done at the same time, and it's amazing how much can a wrongthink change stay up. You have to get creative and not just add jewish before every kike, but put actual effort, but even a low effort one can go quite a long time without being discovered.
A simple way to connect the dots is to add kikes to "A list of Jewish-__ __."
It's already been done with "Jewish-American actors".
To be able to edit faster and easier, go to the "List of Jewish-Americans" (or any other countries), and open ten or so, then open the "What links here" ( en.wikipedia.org
Oh, I’ve tried to do that before. It’s always reverted unless their jewishness is “important to the nature of their work.” It’s an interesting game they play.
Remember when we were editing pictures of kikes to increase the size of their noses? That took a few minutes before it started getting shoah'd.
Just made a communist group, a marxist group, a lefty group, an anti illuminati group, an anti… well, you get the idea, call them the 1% and wait untill some user notice that they arent whites.
These lists are great for identifying kikes. Keep them accurate boys.
bump
Is it even worth it? Wikipedia vols literally sit on their favorite articles and make sure no meanie racist trolls can mess with them. Most wrongthink edits are reverted in around a minute.
Make the edit seem as if it is a compliment.
bump
Kalegri plan
If you think your edits can pass through the radar, like linking to categories of 'Jewish-American writers' or whatever, go for it.
But what we really should do is focus our efforts on discrediting the site entirely, so that in the public mind, wikipedia functions as an instrument of liberal power. People already know it too.
Such low effort
fuck off jew
In order to edit many Wikipedia articles a user must have 5+ edits on an account
We should plan a day for this several days from now so users have time to build up edits
OY VEY
Wikipedia working to scrub conflicts of interest and pertinent information from sitting elected officials, particularly of Israeli origin.
"20:25, 28 June 2018 67.1.212.157 (talk) . . (22,247 bytes) (+19) . . (People come here looking for Jews.)"
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Daily reminder that the Wikipedia article on Paul Nehlen used to claim that he was was "Islamophobic" and other buzzwords with multiple citations to articles. Each article had no mention of Islam in it. They also cited an article that falsely claimed that Nehlen threatened Paul Ryan. Now the article claims that Nehlen is a white supremacist that holds alt-right, white nationalist, and antisemitic views. The (((editors))) of this article have repeatedly violated Wikipedia's own rules on defamation and citing sources.
You don't remember Gamergate, do you? All the soyboys descended on it to spin like hell.
t. thinks he ran into one of Valkenburger's relatives at a law firm recently
bump
Gamergate remembers Wikipedia. Look at who's running the place.
ggwiki.deepfreeze.it
I'l check them dubs Mr. (((1))).