The article 5 about collective defense, that doesn't say a word about spending?
Right back at you, retard.
en.wikipedia.org
nato.int
Ex-German foreign minister: (((Trump))) wants ((('regime change'))) in Berlin
Kayden Turner
Nathaniel Stewart
I'm not sure how else to take the statement that he wants zero protective tariffs on principle and is only forced to resort to implementing stiffer duties because foreign governments don't allow American consumer products into their nations willy nilly.
Leo Howard
Let's start from the reality that NATO is an illegal occupation of Germany. German disinterest in the project, especially when its outwardly stated goal of containing the Soviet Union is no longer relevant, shouldn't come as a surprise nor should it be considered a negative on this board.
Sebastian Peterson
Get the fuck out, nigger.
Eli Jones
the reality that NATO is not capturing Americas interest in the projectt especially when its outwardly stated goal of containing the Soviet Union is no longer relevant, shouldn't come as a surprise nor should it be considered a negative on this board.
Changed it up a bit but that's exactly the platform that Trump ran on in regards to NATO. Its the hypocracy. All the countries in the EU and especially Germany are shrieking on and on about Russia being a threat to their democracies and working to increase their influence in Europe. Whie out the other side of their mouth saying they have to use that money to house and feed refugees and buy Russian gas so they can't meet the NATO spending requirement. Trump does all of Europe a service by dragging this shit out.
Charles Green
Happy 8gag Pol nigger?
Jordan Bell
There is nothing hypocritical about it. Maybe if you genuinely believe the Madison Avenue jew swill you've been served all your life about the end of history and America protecting everyone's freedumbs.
Carter Cook
There is nothing hypocrital about certain NATO allies, who just last year were afraid of a Russian invasion and bleat about their democracies being under attack, not paying their required spending because they have to feed refugees and source Russian gas?
Christopher Sanders
Das rite, frau merkel dindu nuffin.
Matthew Williams
No, not really. Once you understand that not all that is coming from the same sources and when you understand that the migrant situation is a direct result of the destruction of National Socialism in Europe and the implementation of capitalism/social democracy where there has to be a never-ending flow of population to keep the debt pyramid in tact, it makes a lot more sense.
If you look at it solely from the perspective of "America protect da world, nobody pay us" as if the US exterminated the most pro-European movement to have ever graced this earth and put its niggerspic troops all over Europe because it wants what's best for Europe, then sure you'll think its hypocritical.