Degeneracy and Athiesm

How can you call something degenerate without a belief system that provides a basis for objective morality?

If you are an athiest with a purely materialistic explanation for the universe, the only way to escape nihilistic moral relativism is to try and ground morality in a darwinian advancement of the species type ideal. That is, whatever is benificial for the evolution of the species is good and whatever hinders its progress is bad. Taken to its logical end you would arrive at an authoritian state driven by eugenics, which would absorb weaker states until global dominance is achieved.

Does this match your intuitive sense of morality? Is killing the weak/sick wrong?

It seems to me that in order to have a healthy and just society, it is absolutely imperitive to have morality grounded in a cause beyond the material world.

Attached: slut-walk.jpg (400x290, 65.38K)

Other urls found in this thread:

davidlane1488.com/88.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Bump.

Athiests get in here

Oh look! Another religious thread. Zig Forums is the vatican now. Don't (((we))) all love that!

Not sure if OP sets it up for a religious D&C or simply a datamining thread.
1.3 gorillion.

Nearly all countries either have Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, or Hinduism as their prevalent religion. Only very few countries buck this trend with their own niche religions being dominant instead of the main 4. Namely, Israel's Judaism, Japan's japanese religions, China's chinese religions, North Korea's korean religions, and Laos' laotian religions. That's it.

Christianity and Buddhism. For the most part, Christ and Buddha are the best pacifist role models found in any religions. Unlike other figures like Moses or Mohammad, who call for the suffering of those who insult Jews or Islam. For followers trying to reach Heaven or Enlightenment, it generally means not being a terrible person. This urge to peacefulness has helped Christian/Buddhist majority countries give rise to secular democracies instead of theocratic shitholes like Israel or violent Islamic majority countries.
Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Laotian religions. Haven't studied them much, but they seem fine for the most part. Acting more like a cultural thing pertaining to their country's culture, festivals, customs and such. Good for instilling pride in one's country, I suppose.
Judaism and Hinduism. Surprise surprise, a Jewish majority nation is racist to non-Jews. Killing Palestinians, spitting on Christian tourists, harassing African Jews for not being racially pure enough, and making ethno-supremacist laws that benefits Ashkenazi Jews and disadvantages the goyim. And as for India's Hinduism, it seems like their weird caste system sprung up from this religion of theirs. A strange hierarchy to say the least.
Islam. One visit to Zig Forums or LiveLeaks will tell you everything you'll need to know about the intolerant atrocities that Muslims are prone to commit. The less Muslims there are in your country, the objectively safer it is to live there.


OP. I know that you believe that people can still become moral, even in the absence of a religion to guide them. But frankly, it helps a secular country greatly to have a sizable Christian or Buddhist majority by not only providing a good role model (Christ/Buddha; also doing one's best to reach Heaven/Enlightenment), but to also stop immoral religions like Islam from taking over a country's religous majority. Once that happens, the Muslims won't hesitate to behead the atheist infidel and post it online. You can find many such snuff vids circulating the net, unfortunately.

are you a sandnigger?

Im an atheist and a National Socialist. Its maybe a little bit of a controversial combo but ill tell you what i think and why if anyone gaf.

First, atheist. Im not one of those atheists. You know the ones, big mouth, stupid arguments, tries to make atheism into some great world view with ideals or something. Those people can suck a dick. I just dont believe in god or gods. Never have. It means nothing to me, all the god stuff. Idk why, either the bit of my brain that says GOD! isnt working or its working better than everyone else’s? The difference is academic for me at least. INB4 agnostic! no, i genuinely have no belief in god. I dont object to religion or religious believers in general (not all religions are the same however)
Atheism doesnt make me a better person. It doesnt help or grant me any special powers or whatever. If anything it makes things harder. Like op indicated. Where do i get my values and morality?

For a long time i got by on nihilism and self medication (i have never taken drugs, it was gaming et.al for me). Years in fact. I new something was wrong not only with myself but with society. Even as a kid, even though i couldn’t explain why i just switched off from everything. It was all crap.
A lot of it still is, but we all know why thats the case.
Slowly i began to piece together the beginnings of what i now know to be National Socialism. It was a painful process because i had no idea that what i was trying to understand WAS National Socialism. No one had told me, in fact they had deliberately removed it to prevent young men like me from finding hope and sanity. On a personal level that is the reason why i hate them more than anything. They KNEW and they maliciously took away the truth for their own pathetic ends.

It was when i encountered one of the fundamental principles of National Socialism, the simple concept of Natural Law that it all began to make sense. It was like a lightning bolt. THIS was what i was missing. THIS is what they had been so desperate to obscure with their sodomites, trannies, feminists and feckless bread and circuses. Natural Law is TRUTH and it tells me why they are WRONG. I suppose its a bit like a religious believer talking about God?

So what is Natural Law:
Its deceptively simple.
Reality isnt arbitrary, it has a structure to it. It has rules. Physics, chemistry, biology are some of the more obvious ones. Inequality is inherent to existence and is non negotiable thus it is a Natural Law. Violence as a basic mechanism of life is Natural law. Evolution and ruthless selection is Natural law. etc… A bit like op said but more developed.
Now religious people will say that the structure of existence comes from god. Does it matter? We are bound by the rules of reality: Natural Law. Irrespective of god, gods or no god. We must live in accordance with these rules because to go against Natural Law is to go against reality and this is not only insane but doomed.

But i have come to realise that Natural Law is more than just 'how reality works'.
Natural law IS Morality.
What morality can a man have if its not grounded in the rules reality imposes on him and from which he is made of?
What source does he have for his morality if not the truth of reality?
And why would it supersede realities laws?

I could go on but if you find this helpful, good.

Quote:
"Whatever People’s perception of God, or Gods, or the motive Force of the Universe might be, they can hardly deny that Nature’s Law are the work of, and therefore the intent of, that Force."

David Lane, 88 Precepts. Precept 2.
davidlane1488.com/88.html

Attached: 41ccbca357c98542d4419eb835155743efc7c898262c8b1b03a6ff03d56f2d28.jpg (1920x1195, 1.24M)

Atheist*

1580s, from French athéisme (16c.), with -ism + Greek atheos "without a god, denying the gods," from a- "without" (see a- (3)) + theos "a god" (from PIE root *dhes-, forming words for religious concepts).

If Christian morality was so objective there wouldn't be 5000 denominations that vehemently disagree with each other.

Attached: 8e5.png (547x626, 16.55K)

OP IS A MARXIST KIKE HAHAHAHA LOOK AT YOUR PETS BEING SENT HOME HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
SAGEEEEE

Attached: 2eioq7.jpg (356x199 93.41 KB, 53.04K)

Are you a jew?

Did the fact that there are political differences just vanish from your mind, retard?

You should take a look at Hoppeanism and other forms of anarchy, they are the only schools of ideological thought that adhere to natural law by accepting it as the only universal law. National Socialism, in this respect is redundant by attempting enforce exactly the same thing through authoritarianism against its own subjects, when truly the only legitimate authority is what nature enforces.

Attached: Irreligion_map.png (1800x820, 191.87K)

But how do you define "healthy and just", and why do you want a "healthy and just" society? If you say you want one because of your religion, aren't you using circular reasoning?

Attached: circularreasoning1.jpg (391x395, 20.92K)

I have made this discussion many times. The arguments usually posed are

Newsflash: All morality is arbitrary. Religion is simply a way of rationalization after the fact.

Unless you know the exact way the universe works.You will usually end up with an incomplete set of morals.Understanding of the universe is vastly connected with pattern recognition, so the better pattern recognition you have the better you can approach morality.So no, morality is not arbitrary. Human intelligence is insufficient.

Religion is proof the majority of people are easily manipulated.

Anyone else agnostic?

Attached: 1200-337874-atheist-vs-agnostic.jpg (1200x750, 253.75K)

Mostly, intelligent straight white people don't need a common sense guide to living near each other without problems. The bible is 1 part ancient history of what goes wrong when you have jews controlling everything as imposter representatives of an imaginary god. Part 2 is a framework for how to extract yourselves from jew corruption after it already seems too late. Part 3 is an imagining of what the future holds if jews are not eradicated. Seeing as the bible was written after the great works of Plato, they aren't necessary, but there are dumb people who won't figure shit out on their own and stick to it and for those people there is religion.

Attached: churchsign.jpg (360x280, 21.25K)

Attached: world_without_religion.jpg (1280x720, 756.39K)

Those denominations exist because they discard portions of doctrine they dislike, and add doctrine they desire. Pick any denomination, and any literate user can easily show you how their creed deviates from the biblical pattern.

When you think about how the universe came together to create such a perfect balance to facilitate something as fragile and dependent upon certain conditions as life it seems that the only solutions to the problem of how it could be so are that either there is a higher power that made it so through its own control and desire to do so or that throughout the countless possible universes and the extreme unlikelyhood that gravity and other fundamental constants and properties of physics would be set just right so that the universe does not collapse in a reverse big bang from too weak of forces or the entire thing being completely consumed by black holes from too strong forces that it would only make sense that all concioussness would be concentrated in such a universe due to the inability for it to exist outside of such a universe.

nu/pol/ is here

This, but by absorb understand inferior races would be genocided. Can't trust the fuckers, even if you eugenized the fuck out of them you would just be making a stronger enemy.

Atheism isn't a worldview. A person's lack of belief in a god or gods can inform their worldview, but to insist that there is some ideological tether that binds all atheists to each other is pure nonsense. One atheist on the eastern seaboard might oppose abortion and love jews and hate guns, while another in the midwest might be the polar opposite. The fact is that there is an objective morality and this is evidenced by the fact that the "materialistic" atheists are the ones doing less crime than say, Christians, and that's across the board, so your bullshit about "you don't have no moral basis hurr durr!!!" is wrong.

I'd like to make it clear that I'm not an atheist/irreligious person, but I do have great respect for my atheist/irreligious brothers, and it turns out that they are by far and away better to have around than Abrahamites.

… is an empirically observable fact. Atheists as a group share a huge group of believes unrelated to religion. If you know that somebody is an atheist your ability to accurately predict their behavior increases by a lot. You're falling into the same trap leftists fall when they go "you can't know if all those 3rd world rats are going to be a drain on society, I know a smart nigger".

You might be try to weasel you way out of this via "all", but exceptions prove the rule and all that.

Its also Jews.

Shinto, Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism.
I'm actually in an eastern religions class right now and according to the textbook it goes like this:
Shinto is a spin-off of Taoism which itself is a spin-off of Confucianism, which is a spin-off of Buddhism, which is a spin-off of Hinduism, which is a spin-off of the original prehistoric Aryan religion brought over in several waves of eastward migration from somewhere around europe which was eventually captured a series of scriptures called the Vedas.

Sounds good to me.

Sharing a disbelief was never enough to form group identities. Turn yourself to God.

So where does your objective morality come from? Nature is incredibly indifferent

Society is a construct, and everybody has a sense of when a construct is shitty.
You can make anything moral WITH a god, too, but yeah, there are some things that work secularily.

Homosexuality? Scissoring and colonbabies are not a thing, therefore you cannot replenish the tribe, therefore you make living for the tribe more difficult therefore it's degenerate, you're not regenerating the tribe.

Stealing?
You remove resources from the tribe, this hurts the tribe, living on this rock that will kill you without any thought is hard enough, you're degenerating your tribe with stealing.

Murder?
It's difficult enough to live, etc pp, no need to also have some cunt around that stabs you in the back.

Usury?
If all the money around is 1000 monies, and I lend out 1000, how can I expect the guy to pay back 1500?

Abortion?
See above.

Lying?
See above, also the degrading of language.

Anyway, it's not like the Bible, which you are probably advocating for, has anything super special for morals.
The commandments that aren't totally braindead like "don't kill" are things like "don't boil a goat in its mothers milk" and astrology tier fortune cookie things.

Lo' the angels butthole doth looketheth good to the sodomite, thus smoten was he and the bitch of the other guy turned into salt.

Yeah, as I said, you don't need all that bullshit.

Nice "healthy and just morals" you got there.

Attached: 6546456.jpg (259x195, 7.09K)

We have thousands of years of written experience, and trial and error, to determine what works and what does not. That's how you determine what and is not objectively good or bad. Fuck your dumb religion.

All of your moral intuitions and impulses originate from years of evolutionary pressures, all of your intellectual and rational capabilities come from the same place, as do all of your natural attitudes towards others: racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia, and most importantly, anti-semitism, all of these are names given to instinctual reactions that ensured the survival, propagation, and prosperity of your ancestors in the past.

Evolution is the origin of all morality, but, strictly studied and adhered to, evolution IS objective morality, the most objective form of morality possible, as the world is constantly trying to teach us the harsh rules of nature, unless your God or Gods decide to start talking to us again.
The purpose of life is not to build a communist dystopia of impossible equality (and brutal enslavement under the tyranny of the Wahhabi Muslims and/or Talmudic Jews, most likely the latter), it is not the praising of a Jewish God or one of many competing* (*unless you're a Syncratic Henotheistic "Europagan", in which case most of them are the same gods in different forms, and all the myths of European Animism/Polytheism are just different testimonies of the same stories, which are likely a combination of them all) collections of Gods from our ancestor's most primitive eras, which, in either of these cases (Christian or Pagan), may not be there, and following the laws of our Caucasian genetics and pretending they are actually the laws sent down from heaven, while ignoring what the supposedly heaven-sent laws ACTUALLY say.
No, our purpose is something much more humble, something we have lost sight of and have suffered for it - until we return to nature's rule over us, that is: The purpose of our existence is the propagation of our genes unto as many individuals as possible throughout as many future generations as possible, whether directly through our descendants, or indirectly through the descendants of our kin, who also carry our genetics (to a varying degree).
You wanna talk about family values? this purpose, provided by nature itself, without need of God, IS family values, it is also the giver of a man's and woman's place, the biological instincts we have lost touch with dictate DIRECTLY a traditionalist policy of the sexes, without need to appeal to God, most importantly, it also dictates ethnocentric tribalism, as race IS family, by definition, members of any race will always share more genetics with another member of their race than with any member of any other race.
There is no need for elaborate fanfiction regarding (((Cain))) vs. Seth aka (((SET))), and how Jesus wasn't an opportunistic Jewish Rabbi attempting to take the role of Israelite messiah and thus overthrow the Pharisees so that he could be the king of the Jews (in a manner similar to how the protestants attempted to overthrow the catholic papacy to replace it with their own reformed Christianity), but a gentile (who is somehow given legitimacy by being the direct descendant of David, Solomon, and other Jewish kings) attempting to abolish the Jewish people's hold over the Romans (by preaching against the Romans, and ultimately forming the new religious movement that would result in the empire's collapse), after all, he fought the Jewish establishment, it doesn't matter that the reason was to fulfill Jewish prophecy and establish a new Jewish order that would still rule over the gentiles as masters over slaves, he threw the moneylenders out of the temple, it doesn't matter that it was a Jewish temple he threw the moneylenders out of, and was thus doing a favor for the Jews in the process, and it doesn't matter that he never spoke against moneylending outside of the temple, implying that it was them doing usury in the temple that upset him, rather than usury itself.

Never mind that they also make up the majority of zionist gentiles (who love Trump's Jewish connections and respect for Israel, our greatest ally - the leftists are the REAL Nazis, after all), never mind that they lose their majority after you categorize the anti white conservatives (the RINOs, neocons, "magapedes", "based black/brown/jewish/gay guys", and cuckservatives generally) away from the the ethnocentric traditionalist right.


Yes, because it is our WEAKNESS, putting the onus or morality on religion instead of science was a MISTAKE, religion is easily taken down, and once it was gone, we had nothing to replace it, because we never even bothered with a morality that could exist in a world without God, think of this as a call not to build up the same defenses that failed us in the past, but to fortify ourselves against similar attacks in the future, you think you are helping us, but in the long term, YOU ARE DOING HARM.

-

We've tried religion as our moral foundation for a long, long time, and every time the Jews have used it as the point of entry into corrupting our civilizations, IT'S TIME TO STOP.

There has been a better way since Darwin returned on the Beagle, remember, in white nations, it was Christians who were most opposed to eugenics, to racial separation, and so on, atheists have been accused of being the most racist religious demographic in history, and it's time to embrace that fact that these accusations were correct, and add that we did sexism and anti-semitism just fine without the need for the Bible's instruction.

Where do you think you are?

Rather, 1818 America we had actual freedom for white men, and this was the result. Well, the witch burning was religious shit. There's nothing objectively wrong with slavery, lynching, prostitution etc. Drugs should not be illegal. They're used more now than they were in 1818, and everything is illegal now. "Gender discrimination" could otherwise be described as a normal male and female role in society, which we Europeans developed over thousands of years, which works well. "Racism" is in-group preference, which is good. "Pedophilia" didn't exist. People did not go around fucking 8 year olds. We're not shitskins. Save for witch burning, 1818 America was pretty much total freedom, and it was a pretty incredible time. Non-whites are not entitled to the freedom we allot to ourselves. They are not us. Things were done right, for the most part, back then. If someone was out of line, you had the freedom to correct them. People stayed in line.

According to the atheists (who, I'd like to remind you are a demographic that commit far less crime than many Abrahamites) the fact that we abide by instinctive morality and have a conscience is due to the fact that we Homo sapiens are a social species, and those with overly anti-social (Slaughtering the in-group members and the like) behavior were weeded out long ago.

Note that this is their position, not necessarily mine, although I can agree that this is part of it.

Only on the edgy Vietnamese basket weaving forums. Try such plus legalizing racism and marring 12 years old as official politic and see how far your society moral preference will let you go.

Fun fact is religious America of 1818 was actually ancap paradise. Makes you think, huh?

I'd rather be a atheist then a Abrahamist any day.

No, it was an ethno-nationalistic paradise where if you were not a white man of a specific stock, you weren't allowed in unless you were a slave, or had something greatly beneficial to us. Filtered for pushing communist bullshit on Zig Forums, you rat filth.

That's how most of the world operates outside of the west

Found the Europoor

Oh no, now the enlightened euro is now going to spam his based 56% memes at you!

Natural selection. Societies with bad morals not promoting safety and mutual support lose competition to societies who do. Individuals who are not falling in the groups morals standard are weeded out by these group majority, if society don't have such anti alien policy, they obviously fail competition too. Because non enforced morals are equal to non existing morals.

Oh no, what a tragedy, a group of (((politicians))) couldn't control what firearms white men had.

What's wrong with you?

Authoritarianism and strong capable leaders are fundamental to the survival of social animals.
Authoritarianism is Natural Law, at least as it pertains to the logos of our species.

Uhh Western Europe is as "west" as you can get

...

Again go on elections with promise to make legal over the counter sales of machineguns to everyone, including felons and see how you would do.

Attached: 6356345.jpg (1200x627, 475.46K)

I'm just shitposting, this thread is garbage.
Captcha-hjuynd- Hitler Jugend

You are right, strip the kulaks of their guns.

...

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

WARNING PROJECT BLUE BEAM OR FAKE TECH SINGULARITY

Where we are going, we don't need food comrade!

Lol we say kikes around here

Suffering, you fucking moron.
Saged.

African slavery was the biggest mistake in American history, bar none, and most problems in America thereafter and even today are the result. The war to end slavery was the most costly in terms of deaths and suffering endured. The cascade of social movements in the 60's was really kicked off by racial civil rights activism. The dream of colonization never occurred, and society became a permanent powder keg of groups that can't practically culturally integrate. Also, what if you were a field slave, or a pleasure hole to some Ottoman sultan? That would be a pretty bad deal, huh, you ice-chewing autist.

Attached: AsMyErhuWeeps.webm (320x240, 7.35M)

99.99% of Zig Forums are atheists. Stop with these threads. It's clearly a forced meme.

The civil war wasn't about ending slavery. It was a coalition of states opposing the federal government. Slavery was only bad in that we kept the niggers here after the fact, rather than removing them or killing them. Slavery itself was beneficial for a time. If you're arguing the benefit of slavery, you've already lost. Nearly every empire in history relied upon slavery to one extent or another. Slavery is objectively beneficial.

...

Not true. Also, of those who are, it would depend what you mean by atheist. There's the lack of belief in a god, and then there's atheism the movement, which is a marxist movement. I'd hope there's not too many of those sub-humans on here. Self-proclaimed atheists are such detestable filth that I would never identify with them. It's better to say "I don't believe in a god" than say "I'm an atheist."

The decline of religion is one of the main signs leading to a civilisational collapse. For better or worse, it plays an important role in society otherwise people start believing in even loonier clown world type shit like your op pic.

Attached: a0eea82f1b2e6ad8b8bdb2b4b5dfa449855d0a19_00.jpg (512x349, 20.54K)

You're wrong. There's nothing you can say to make you right.

What religion, and when, nigger?

What? Relative number of religious people grows in the world.

Attached: 760044.jpg (800x532, 19.86K)

This is by far the most jewish fucking thing that a kike has ever posted here.

Attached: 18268465_845452395602718_3273874867421482890_n.jpg (382x379, 29.53K)

hinduism is aryan you fuck the caste system appeared for a reason

buddhism spurred forth from hinduism
search the physical traits of sidartha gautama

fuck off back to your containment board and kill yourself

siddhartha*

National Socialism had an idealist core hitler loved schppenhauer. Most of the higherups believed in german idealist notions of the divinity read kant schelling and hegel if you're interested

schopenhauer

You're a literal fucking nigger. Filtered.

You might not have the blood of a Jew, but by God you have the soul of one.

Also buddhism accepted the caste system since buddha was a hinduist prince

To be fair, the Church ain't exactly a bastion of morals either. Rather than save millions of Christians facing persecution and death they import millions of Muslims instead.

So Romans were jews, Vikings were jews, the British were jews, the French were jews, the Spanish were jews, the Chinese were jews, the Aztec were jews, and even National Socialists were jews, since they had forced labor/slavery camps. We're all fucking jewish now! Or you're just a low-IQ nigger.

Oh, I forgot one of the biggest. The Egyptians, who expelled the jews, were also jews!

(((Reasons)))

read nietzsche, faggots

Attached: nietzsche on jewish moral subversion.png (1200x716, 670.13K)

Don't read Nietzche only, he will tear rour metaphisical framework down and you won't be able to reconstruct it by yourself.
Read other philosophers too like i said earlier read other germans like Schelling, Hegel, Kant Schopenhauer, Fichte.

metphysical*

Exodus was a fiction.

Mg i can't write today

But yes read him. He makes a good diagnosis

why would you post the disrespectful mustache picture if you are a fan? his sister made him grow it after he went crazy and used it for promotional purposes.

I wish i had that mustache though

That's your response? So you stand by your assertion that posits all of these people are jews? Or maybe your moralisms and world view are fucked up and not at all in tune with true European ideals and morals, or rather, good ideals and morals, that saw many peoples all over the world to great success.

Idealism Vs Materialism is another false paradigm. Just like L vs R or Collective vs Individualist.
Its idealist yeah, but its grounded in hard reality.

Yes, it is so is german idealism

dat flavor saver

German idealism has most of it's motivations on the justification of science

Ok.

...

I'm beginning to think the people that say this don't know what a paradigm is.