Consider this. From now on, we start calling all whites, med, celt, germanic, norse, baltic, slav, anglo or finno-ugric peoples Aryans as long as they actively oppose white genocide and have their eyes open to the Jewish question. This would mean that the average normalfag, who is not woke to the JQ and likely doesn't care for fascist ideals, would NOT be considered Aryan. Why?? As the new conditions for even falling under this term become known, people will become interested in researching our subjects. Compare it to those time-waster facebook personality quizes. Further, actively using the term Aryan will inevitably draw attention from the media which always helps. Additionally, it will cut back on the ethnic d&c that some of us have been getting… upset by. In other words, it will grow our movement, generate buzz and unite us in a time where certain (((individuals))) have been turning us against ourselves.
We have nothing to lose with this and would gain quite a bit. Hitler too broadened the Aryan term for political reasons multiple times, so this is not unprecedented.
ARYAN PEOPLPE OF ANCIENT PERSIA Because Darius the Great said so. CELTIC PEOPLE OF ANCIENT EUROPA Because they called themselves as such.
Jose Jones
In royal Old Persian inscriptions, the term arya- appears in three different contexts: 1. As the name of the language of the Old Persian version of the inscription of Darius I in the Bistun Inscription. 2. As the ethnic background of Darius the Great in inscriptions at Rustam Relief and Susa (Dna, Dse) and the ethnic background of Xerxes I in the inscription from Persepolis (Xph). 3. As the definition of the God of Iranians, Ohrmazd, in the Elamite version of the Bistun Inscription.
In the Dna and Dse, Darius and Xerxes describe themselves as "an Achaemenid, a Persian, son of a Persian, and an Aryan, of Aryan stock". Although Darius the Great called his language arya- ("Iranian"), modern scholars refer to it as Old Persian because it is the ancestor of the modern Persian language.
Leo Long
I don't have a better unifying identifier than 'Celtic' for the European people. It is an ancient concept and not many people will be so accepting of this identity, since 200-2,000years of not being Celtic, depending on culture, is quite some time. However, the ability to shed 2,000 years of jewry and unite might require doing exactly this. It would be better if people could discover what tribes their modern culture descends from. Here is a start: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ancient_Celtic_peoples_and_tribes
Right now Europeans have these cultural identities: Personal Identity: Chad Chadington III Family Identity: Son of Chad Chadington and Stacy Stacyham Community Identity: Chadsmere County/District/Borough Regional Identity: Chadic Region National Identity: National Socialist Republic of Chad Racial Identity: Chadopean But, when you want to include those of European descent in other places like the US or Australia, there really is no unifying identifier. "White" strips people of their ancestral heritage and cultural identity, and it includes Arabs and Pajeet, so it is not an accurate label.
Jose Brooks
no lets sage this thread …. you little cunts with your "big ideas". Just fucking make money and get influence, you dont have to take after the fucking sjw shitters and try to redefine things
stop carring about what shitters think , let them follow their own loser behavior and just fucking stick to the fundamentals (health , wealth, power)
in 5 years youll see them as just annoying, in 10 years youll see them as funny , in 20 years youll see them as something to exploit. For now you are poor and cant see this option, work away from them , not towards them
sage because this thread starts off on the wrong foot. When you play the outfield , its always frist foot back
Cooper Perez
I don't like the term Aryan. I don't know why people cling to it.
Luke Cooper
Fuck off Jew next thing you know Ethan Goldberg and his 12 curly haired shits will claim Aryan heritage too
Carter Parker
Modern Europe: North = Nordic NorthWest = Celtic NorthEast = Slavic Central = Germanic SouthEast = Balkic SouthWest = Hispanic South = Italic These are mostly based on macro language groups but do have some logic flaws. 'Celtic' was once all of Europe, through the entire Bronze and Iron Ages, and likely from earlier than that, but have been reduced to the Scots, Irish, Welsh, Anglos, Galatians, Cantabrians, Celtiberians, and some other smaller groups; this NorthWest group would need a new name. Also, 'Germanic' could be 'Francic' or 'Franco-germanic', so as to include the French, who are genetically the same as Germans but culturally different. This also excludes some smaller groups in these areas that would not fit into these categories such as the Basque people.
It would almost be easier, and more accurate, to have a Celtic Europe with each nation, no matter the size, representing their tribal ancestors from that area, for example, the Helvetii (Swiss) or the Norici (Austrians).
