An old topic by now, but media outlets are still brandishing the term like a weapon. What do they have to gain by demonizing such apparently volatile and vulnerable demographics? They are very eager to make comparisons to islamic terrorists and call for anti-terror like measures.
archive.is
Incels
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
static.independent.co.uk
twitter.com
I can be sympathetic towards incels but a lot of them really do cause their own problems. I also noticed that a lot of them are non-white and/or mixed as well. If the media knew their demographics like I do, (in other words if they actually bothered to read their forums and see what they say with an open mind instead of skimming for something to get triggered about) I doubt they would be so vocal. By my rough estimatet least half and possibly more of incels are non-whites.
>make playing video games and being an incel both mental disorders by paying (((psychologists))) to declare it
Sounds about right to me. What about you?
I get the fact that its just another attack vector to shame and attack white males but I honestly don't get why they are hammering this point. Normies already are wary of antisocial virgins and already label such individuals as being outcasts and likely mass shooters. It goes in hand with that "its the quiet ones you gotta watch" thing.
Its just bizarre they feel the need to reinforce a point that the normie public has already swallowed without even one incident needed.
I have a sneaking suspicion that a huge portion of them are poos/mixed poos. Poor little shitters, no one, not even their own women want them.
When women become sexually unavailable, unexamined young men become extremely fucked up. I suppose they have a point in comparing them to muslims, because traditionally the footsoldiers were completely deprived of women and the chief took them all in a harem. No wonder they blow themselves up for the promise of 70 virgins. In China there is a problem with the balance of males to females because of abortion, and because there are so many excess males they have to offload them to africa and the west because they would go full on collapse mode otherwise. It's a huge civilizational mistake to advance sexual non-monogamy, and that's exactly what you know who are doing with this incel brand and promotion of sexual openness.
user, incels were who have almost-always changed the course of history. They weren't called that of course, but it's very often been exactly that type who have made great changes. When you have very little power, influence, and even possessions, you have very little keeping you from taking great chances. When they find themselves as men, then they tend to become capable of amazing things. Hitler could have been described as an incel, for example.
forgot to add that the reason they're demonized so heavily, is because they know what the incels are doing to the establishment elites, and they want the normies not to listen. So, the media demonizes them.
Who are most likely to be redpilled on the jews for instance? The incel, that's who.
en.wikipedia.org
incredible bias, I wasn't expecting this even on wikipedia
Incel is literal newspeak. You're engaging in the dumbing down of language as a whole by continuing to use it.
Side note since I am a fucking friendless shut in but are normies actually talking about this IRL? Anyone have stories?