It's a desperate act of (poorly done) damage control. There is really nothing to refute.
Can we get a refutation for this video?
Nolan Thompson
Aaron Evans
Jeremiah Campbell
It is as a result of that. Immigrants make the country shittier and reduce social truat, so then Whites do not want to raise children in that environment. General social decay reduces birth rates, and migration induces social decay.
Owen Perry
...
Joseph Campbell
And this is false
Dylan Torres
Hey guys, spend all your time refuting someone else's hour long video.
And OP_vidpost. Sage.
Nathan Jenkins
No.
Isaac Garcia
Only trash people breed with other trash people; only the miscegenaters are weeded out by this. On top of this, how would the interests of new populations differ from established ones, especially as the new ones come to be the established ones themselves? Within a country there are already different interests, such as between farmers and urban folk, but why would migrants be different?
Can I have a source for that? I haven't seen anything myself to indicate that only non-whites remain
I haven't seen anywhere in the video where it claims that, and I haven't in the OP. In fact I'm against an actual genocide of whites, but the mere changing of ratios doesn't exactly constitute for actively displacing white quantities.
Poles and Romanians both lead in crime, pic related
It's true nonetheless. And it's more so having 20 apples and 1 banana and adding one more banana, and then subtracting one apple for unrelated reasons.
migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk
15.7% of migrants are Polish while the next largest group, Indians, are 6.4%
Camden Jackson
Okay.
How did you not?
It mathematically blatant.
When London becomes majority non-White, ethnic Whites aren't being replaced.
What?
Again, London, your argument is invalid.
Yes, it is. If the overall population is increasing and your ethnic population is decreasing in proportional representation, to the point your capital city becomes majority non-White, the idea that your population is not decreasing is absolute nonsense.
Again: If I have a box with 9 apples and 1 banana, and we add such that it becomes a box with 100 bananas and 10 apples,the fact that the number of apples increased says nothing as to whether or not the apples were 'replaced' by the bananas as far as proportional representation in the population of fruit in the box.
The migrant crisis worsens conditiobs for Whites, making themless inclined to reproduce, which is then used as justification to bring in the migrants, which then lessens White birthrate, etc etc etc.
You're being VERY disingenuous to claim that the migrant crisis is not directly linked with the low birthrate, which further derives from social policy abd media propagandizing, by the same people who want to bring in the foreigners.
Prove it.
Prove it.
Prove. It.
None of us are going to watch your awful video, okay? So don't come here and present that as evidence - you watched the video, right? (Let's be honest, you probable made it.) So what was the data presented that brought you to the claims above? Present it, now, here.
They aren't though, read your Putnam.
That's absolutely ridiculous.
Again, bananas and apples.
If the apples stop reproducing, so to speak, so you flood the box with banananas, you can't then claim that you've had no impact upon the population of apples, doubly so when the whole situation is derivative from the actions of the (((fruit merchants))).
Cooper Myers
This is simply false in of itself. The mere presence of non whites in white countries necessarily displaces whites, and takes away resources that would have gone to whites on every single level, be it housing, social services, jobs etc. The demographic game is inherently zero sum.