Somehow this seems like the most idiotic move. The Yugoslav royal leadership was pro-British and anti-communist, and would've been a most valuable ally in the Cold War. Furthermore, Yugoslavia was apart from Greece the only non-communist country in Eastern Europe who actually fought the Nazis after 41 - Hungaria, Romania, Bulgaria, etc. all collaborated. So Yugoslavia had international legitimacy in not becoming a Soviet satellite (as restitution for collaboration) and in fact with Greece the same exact reasoning kept it free.
So why did Churchill favor Tito (the commie leader) over Draza Mihailovic (the royalist leader)? It was obvious that Tito would betray him and not hold independent elections as he had promised, he simply had no reason to. The most frequent reason given for Churchill's support of commie Tito was that he fought the Nazis more effectively than the royalists, which while true did not make a difference in the grand scheme of things - maybe shorten the war by a week or so at most, and that wasn't worth losing half of southeastern Europe to the commies.
I feel like this was either a stupid move, and I don't think the British leadership was stupid, or it was a perfidious scheme that I don't quite see through. Any ideas Zig Forums?
Why did Churchill give Yugoslavia to the commies?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
archive.is
archive.is
nytimes.com
en.wikipedia.org
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
twitter.com
All royal leaderships were taken out and replaced with (((democracy))). That way people believe they're in charge of their destiny rather than leaving it at the hands of some ruler. If things go sideways "well you shouldn't have voted for X" forgetting the fact that voting X, Y or Z will give you the same result.
because churchill was a rothscdhild puppet
It was a perfidous scheme m8. It was the same reason why Roosevelt gave poland to uncle joe; that is what (((they))) wanted.
It's true that the British leadership supported, or at least recognized the democratic February Revolution 1917 in Russia, however, it wouldn't have made any sense for Churchill to hate monarchies even more than he hated communism.
Yugoslavia was not going to become a democracy with a commie leader in charge of all the armed forces, that must have been obvious to everyone.
Rhodesia was INCREDIBLY pro British (or at least the queen) and fervently anti communist, but Britain still boycotted and sanctioned Rhodesia as the only nation to ever be hit with something as hard as Germany in that regard.
tl; dr:
jews.
It came to a point where Draza Mihailovic was basically controlled opposition for the axis powers and the British wanted someone to violently overthrow the occupation, which the Communists were able to do. The situation after the war was not ideal but they had to act in the present.
Because he was a fucking cocksucker OP who did more to single handedly wreck the world than anyone I can remember. His warmongering led Britain and France into fighting a brotherwar with Germany rather than joining her and ridding the world of bolshevism.
Because he was a Jewish puppet.
First, you need to lurk moar.
Secondly, the more pertinent question is "Why did Churchill go to war with Germany?"
One common answer is "because Germany invaded Poland and Britain was allied to Poland."
True enough.
But, the soviets invaded Poland AT THE SAME TIME as Germany.
So why didn't Britain go to war with the soviets?
Why did Britain ally with the soviets?
The soviets had committed EXACTLY THE SAME transgression as Germany, yet their invasion of Poland was ignored.
Short answer: Churchill, the Soviets, and FDR were all controlled or heavily influenced by kikes and kike banker families.
It was all horseshit.
Also, there was no "holocaust" of jews. There were containment camps, but there were under 300,000 deaths and most of those were from typhus or natural causes.
The "six million" was, is, and always has been kike bullshit lies and propaganda.
The REAL "holocaust" was the 15 million Germans murdered during and AFTER the war. Indeed, most of the deaths were AFTER the war when the allies murdered millions of Germans.
The US army alone killed between 1.5 and 2 million German POWs after the war.
The villains won WW2.
This
It was a British colony
He was a Rothschild puppet
This.
And guess what, the Zig Forumss here on 8ch are mostly anti-freedom christfag cucks. Mosley was is and was too good for them. Their greatest hope in Nigel. Pathetic really.
Brit christfags (Anglican British Empire) gave up the 'holy land' to the Jews.
Brits have been cucked by the Jews since Cromwell let them back in.
Britain has been anti-British since joining the war for the Jews in ww2. First the colonies were abandoned, and now Britain herself is to be given up to rapine.
Or since they converted to liberal Judaism err Christianity.
You're forgetting that there was a 3-way war in Yugoslavia during WW2.
Brits were supporting Royalists, but the problem was that Royalist/Draža's primary goal was to fight commies first, axis second. This made brits support Draža less and less and swing their support to Partisans/Tito more and more over the war.
Partisans/Tito's goal was to fight Axis first and revolution second, which brought them support from both Soviets and (later in the war) Western powers.
Tito himself didn't like Stalin. After the war the western support helped him break away from Stalin and not let Yugoslavia become Soviet puppet state. Remember that Yugoslavia was communist but in very weird way and it wasn't part of the Eastern Blok.
Not exactly the same, considerably worse than Germany. Germany was reclaiming majority German populated lands that had been stolen from it only 20 years before at the treaty of Versailles. The Soviets had no such justification, it was pure aggression against the Poles to further their plan for Jewish Bolshevism to conquer Europe, then the world.
Same reason they gave Poland and half of Germany.
Churchill was a pawn.
trump is buddies with boris so there's that
but what happens when trump is forced out after 8 years?
Churchill always struck me a's given far more credit than deserved. He ended the empire. He should rot in shame to the Brits, too bad they deserved him.
heh, nothin personal kid
Reminds me of Trump's unearned joy in conning people. Doesn't even know why he does it, he just likes thinking he is smarter. Nevermind he left his nation in ruins forever so he could play tough guy.
OP doesn't seem to have the full scoop on Tito's identity. His real name was Joshua Ambroz Tito and he was born in Vienna to Samuel Meyer (entrepreneur) and his wife who may or may not have been Gentile. At any rate, the locksmith we have come to know as Tito had died way back in WW1 on the Eastern front while serving in the Austrian-Hungarian army, which made it easier to take on his identity.
Fresh reminder that the Yugoslavia psy-op was staged by Austria-Hungary's rivals in order to break it up into small countries that had traditionally stuck together. Slovenia and Croatia went from being the frontier of the West to cash cows slaving away for the rest of the "Slavic" union, which led to secession and war in the 1990's.
Recommended reading for those who are not well-versed in the history of Yugoslavia:
http://
www.studiacroatica.org/revistas/169/16901.htm
They wanted all of the Slavic world to be communist.
Britain and France had lost their status as world powers by ww2. Churchill couldn't give any one anything, and was only present at talks with the US and the Soviets as a token member, out of courtecy. The US and Soviets ran the show after ww2, and grabbed as much land while their tanks were in Europe anyway.
The same reason he started WW2, killed tens of millions of innocent people, and gave half of Europe to the (((communists))). He was a kike tool.
Why didn't Churchill declare war on the USSR for invading Poland?
Pretty much this. After the initial stages of World War 2 Churchill had become well aware that he had got Britain into a war it could not win, and this is why he was struck down with severe depression and went missing for weeks at a time. I know Zig Forums likes to characterise people in very simplistic ways (and this is pretty apt for a lot of Jews, but where people who make deals with them get involved it is far less clear cut - although as we all know the answer is to just not make deals with the devil), but Churchill's actions and speeches show a very interesting character - although we should certainly not excuse his initial warmongering, it is clear that he wanted to preserve the nation with his campaigns to keep England white and his attempts to hold on to the Empire. It had become clear relatively early on that Britain's only chance at holding onto its Empire was by projecting a 'shadow of power', because in reality it was spread far-too-thin and the people were far too disgruntled to actually maintain it with force or funds. The Great War (WW1) had already stripped the masses of their desire to fight and had left a divided nation - the communist jews and their feminist, atheist and globalist allies were already entrenched, and the rising Fascist groups (and there were several of them) made it so that life on the home-front was anything but stable. Churchill's warmongering might well have been more about trying to instill stability on the masses by giving them what he thought would be a quick and easy victory (afterall the Germans had been defeated and bankrupted only decades before, and even though he would be aware of Hitler's success in rebuilding - I doubt that anyone realised just how amazingly well Hitler had done, or how powerful Germany had become). When the time came to deal with the Americans Churchill had a tough choice - surrender Britain's position in the world, or risk it all for the title of 'the invincible Empire' - and in fairness to Churchill, had the US not been the primary enemy of the Empire, his gable might well have succeeded as even today many in the world still believe Britain is a force of power far beyond what it actually is. But the Americans did want to destroy the Empire, and the Americans were the only people Britain could turn to, and the Jews were the ones doing the majority of the negotiating for both sides. So are we surprised that Israel was founded? … Anyway, as to the quote - the Americans were well aware that Britain was a waning Empire and they fully indended to destroy it by funding, arming and training revolutionaries the world over - from India to Ireland. If the Brits had been declared 'losers' and kept out of the talks then the yids would have run the risk of creating a British Hitler in a few years, and that was infinitely more scary because it could create simultanous 'National Socialist-esque' revolutions all across the fragmenting Empire, which could utterly defeat them. So Britain instead was played up as a victor despite everyone at home knowing otherwise, and a war of subterfuge was waged against them until they are in the state they are today.
Let's hope the Brits have the last laugh though, because the instilled ideas of 'freedom of speech' that they have given the world are proving a thorn in the kike's rear all the time. It's not over yet.
Like Churchill, Cromwell is a very interesting character. His decision to let the jews back in was actually Dutch terms for a loan so that he could fight the Papist King. The fact that the King was re-instated more or less instantly after Cromwell died should go some way to showing you how fearful the Jews were of an actual Puritan republic, as much like the early days of the US - Cromwell's England would be a radical enemy of the Christ-killers.
Honestly I find both Winson Churchill and Oliver Cromwell to be among the most interesting characters in history. Both of them seem to have had pure beliefs, and both were manipulated by kikes - and after their mistake both went out of the way to try and minimise the damage the kikes could do, only to have it reversed. The moral of the story is, of course, "Never make deals with the devil."
how fearful the Jews were of an actual Puritan republic
I mean if we're going to greentext battle
>Supposed allies the (((Dutch))) say they will help but only if he lets a few of these ugly friends of theirs live in the nation
Now what I did gives more information than yours anyway, but even that is too simplistic. There was an awful lot going on, but anyone who has seriously looked into the history would not think the Cromwell had any love of the jews. It would be nice if we could go back to real debates with actual information, instead of a pathetic 2 line 'summary' of history that distorts everything in ways that we used to accuse of the yids of doing.
Yugoslavia was a lot more functional when it was ran by this guy. Everyone had an equal place and a voice. It really fell more because of the Germans than the Brits, but the Brits are the ones who instituted communism by supporting Tito and getting Peter the II to die and get buried in Denver Colorado of all places.
When it got taken over by that filthy Croat Tito, it all went to shit in a decade. Dude had over a hundred mansions around the world while his people starved and so much debt built up that the house of cards had to collapse in the 80s.
Because he was a cunt.
https://
en.metapedia.org/wiki/Josua_Ambroz_Tito
Tito was Jewish. If everyone had equal say in Yugoslavia, where did the Ustasha come from? Take your Serbian king and keep him in your country. I like him very much when he stays there.
For Serbs, slandering their neighbors comes before telling it the way it is about Jews. For shame!
Because Churchill was a fucking idiot who just happened to be witty
He was puppeteered by the elites to do their bidding, such as initiating the war with Germany, being the first to bomb civilians and feeding his own allies to the enemies to maximize the amount of damage they received
He was a war criminal and the only people who like him are retarded fucking Britbongs who ignore everything terrible he dis
To give the Germans another front to fight and soldiers to manage.
Hitler probably suggested to the British secretly that they should ally against Soviet Union and Communism.
Little did he know that Britain was under the same leadership as Soviet Union. Albeit hidden until SU invaded Europe.
or did he
Hitler was a major wrench in the plan. And he probably intended on losing WW2 just to expose those behind the scenes. Germany never had a chance of winning.
He at least ensured that people knew that everything isn't as it looks like. And those could pick up the job that he intended them to pick up.
Now that is intelligence.
Is there literally any country on Earth that liked Soviet Communism? Not even Stalin liked it and he almost got unpersoned by his own (((doctors))).
Communist China hates it because they tried to kill them while the Germans supplied them with food and weapons, Norks don't even acknowledge it as anything more than a kickstarted for the Best Korean System, Vietcongs also hate both Communist China and Soviet Russia because they could have become either's bitch at any point, the Middle East hates Stalin because he tried to get their clay… Only indoctrinated Americans and West Germans think the Union was any good.
Truly 4D Chess
Is this a serious fucking question?
Ustashe didn't care about an ethnically pure country, they just wanted to go back to being untermenchen slaves where it was warm and safe, and not go out there in the cold harsh world where they were the masters. For fucks sake Ustashe worked with Handschar muslim divisions to kill fellow Croatians. If Ustashe gave a single solitary fuck about Croatian welfare, why didn't they try to restart the Croatian monarchy?!
Sometimes people who call you out aren't serbian, you're just being a retard.
All of you are like little babby.
Same reason he have Poland to the commies.
He was in league with the Jews.
I agree, but parts of Croatia rightfully belong to us as compensation for WW1.
Anglos are kikes.
This, just browse Zig Forums for a while. Those people are a bunch of unironic civic nationalists and homos. Some people over there even admit to dating pakis because they can't get a White British gf.
He didn't. If I remember correctly they settled on 50/50 split in Yugoslavia. But he got outplayed by Stalin. That wasnt hard to predict considering that Tito was only one big player after war there.
You funny German
Kikes like (((Kissinger))) were against Rhodesian independence. This old kike is still alive and kicking, why has nobody killed this demonic cocksucker yet?
No, they've been anti-English (continuing to be anti-British) since Cromwell. The UK has the longest Jewish occupation of any Western country.
Because he worked for the Jews.
Because Churchill didn't have a choice. By D-Day Tito's army already controlled Yugoslavia. They had booted out the Wehrmacht and were on solid ground to resist allied incursion. If Churchill or Roosevelt wanted to take over they would have had a new war on their hands. A war against hardened partisan veterans who'd already beat the Germans and knew how to defend on difficult terrain.
Yugoslavia was national socialism for the Southern Slavs. Sure the ideology may have been Marxist, but it was an explicitly ethnonationalist state. They maintained independence from NATO and the USSR for 40+ years.
Ignore all shills bitching about Yugo commies. These are Serbians still butthurt about the loss of their cucked little king. Belgrade got to be capital of Yugoslavia but that still wasn't enough gibs for the Serb niggers.
Karadjordjevic didn't "run Yugoslavia". Yugoslavia didn't even exist while he was alive. It was forged by the pan-slav alliance headed by Tito. Peter ruled Serbia. That's it.
And he failed to stop the German invasion. You may love Uncle Adolph and I do too but every ethnic group has a right and duty to defend their homelands from foreigners. Peter failed in every regard. End of story.
"Yugosavia" wasn't better off, either. Prior to the war most of the Southern Slavs lived as medieval peasants. Under Tito's rule it transformed into a fully industrialized nation by 1975. The standard of living was comparable to America or Europe, and higher than the USSR. Socialist Yugoslavia was a net exporter of both finished goods and expert engineers.
Anyone who knows the history of Yugoslavia knows
1) Tito was Slovene and Croat. Not Jewish.
2) The kike-controlled NATO and Soviets did everything they could to subvert and dominate Yugoslavia after the war. Tito wasn't a Kike. He beat the Kikes.
You're fucking retarded, plain and simple.
So Hitler knew that all the odds were against him, yet continues anyway so that the world can be permanently redpilled on (((them))) after his defeat?
I doubt he intended for this to happen, going by what he and Goebbels were writing and saying before it all ended for them. Not to mention those that fought for Hitler that managed to escape to safety, most notably Léon Degrelle, who was trying to tell people their side of the story.
Too bad it didn't last. Montenegro was the latest to join NATO, so it appears that the kikes have managed to worm their way in.
Churchill was just doing whatever his globalist (((banker))) sponsors were telling him to do. Serbian (Yugoslav) royals fled with gold reserves to England, if monarchists won they would bring at least part of it back, this way it stayed over there. Pragmatically looking, Tito was much more capable and monarchy was going out of fashion. Also this:
Socialist Yugoslavia was something closest to the NS ethnostate in post WW2 world. It didn't have much to do with "commies" , you could own business and trade stocks, it just didn't have Jewish capitalist slavery and degeneracy.
Few fun facts for oblivious Americans:
- Karadjordjevic dynasty was illegitimate, basically they were a bunch of kikes who seized the opportunity during the uprising
- They were judeo-masonic rats
- Kikes owned most major industries during their rule, Kingdom of Yugoslavia was almost Weimar tier before German occupation
Which is the only reason why they were favored by (((British crown))), compared to some genuine royal families like Romanovs.
...
Serbs were always the goodest goys. Most of their modern national "heroes" were massive kike enablers. Take Gavrilo Princip for example, a Jew with a pseudonym who assassinated the Archduke (who was ironically linked to Serbian nobility) and caused Serbia to almost stop existing as a consequence in a war that they gained almost nothing from, but from which kikes have profited massively. He got trained by Georg Weiffert (A German Freemason and a Jew who owned a brewery in Serbia) and who is now featuring on Serbian banknote/currency as a "great" person.
Fast forward to WW2, and they betrayed the alliance with Germany. (Serbian airforce was equipped with newest German planes and trained with their pilots, which certainly wouldn't happen if Germany wanted to attack Serbia initially) They gained absolutely nothing from this.
Fast forward to 1990's, and their Jewish masters pay them back by destroying their country, then in 2000's robbing everything that's left, then in 2010's using them as an organ harvesting farm. If any nation deserves to cease existing, it's them.
Croats and Serbs are essentially the same shit with different dialects. Yugoslav identity might have been somewhat artificial and forced, but it was a national identity. That was based on genetic, cultural, ethnic etc similarity and not kike scams like civic nationalism. Tito probably gave in to Albanians to prevent Soviets from using them as destabilizing element, which is always a bad move, no exceptions.
This. Southern Slavs are an ethnic superset. Until Tito they had been ruled by forigen dynasties as far back as the Roman empire. Yugoslavian socialism was the first real self-determination they ever had.
Thats why USA supported Milosevic in his plan to turn Yugoslavia in "Greater Serbia"? until 1995?
4D chess
Milosevic was originally a CIA agent, so were most other wartime leaders. It didn't matter which village is going to win, what mattered is that Yugoslavia is broken up, destroyed, and enslaved. The fact that the highest debt which Yugoslavia had was much lower than debts of any individual country that was part of it today. And it had functioning industry, economy, manufacturing, so those loans were put to good use.
Partisans were scum and trash, and Yugoslavia had many flaws, but it was the next best thing to being part of the Reich.
Serbian monarchists are worst cucks in existence, they are indirectly serving the eternal Anglo, their greatest enemy. Not to mention that there is practically no legitimate nobility as it never had the chance to form due to historical circumstances.
Churchill fucking bricklayer
Totally unfuny did Poland annex German territory, genocide its German population. Of course, Poland never allowed a referendum because they could imagine the result – in favor of Germany.
Muh Partitions:
Prior to Partitions there was no Polish national identity, only szlachta of all ethnic backgrounds was considered and referred to as Poles.[72][73][74]
An exact counterpart of Szlachta society was the Meerassee (wiktionary:mirasdar) system of tenure of southern India—an aristocracy of equality—settled as conquerors among a separate race.[19]:484 The Polish state paralleled the Roman Empire[24][25][26] in that full rights of citizenship were limited to the szlachta.[27][28][6]
this
They tried en.wikipedia.org
multiple times (pic).
Also, tito was pretty interesting fellow. He was in Vienna at time that hitler was there
1913: When Hitler, Trotsky, Tito, Freud and Stalin all lived in the same place archive.is
From the 1720s onwards, the fortress was used to incarcerate political prisoners, in the Trubetskoy Bastion and the Secret House in the Alexeevskiy Ravelin (built in the 1790s). Among the most famous inmates were more than 200 of the conspirators involved in the Decembrist Uprising of 1825; Fyodor Dostoevsky; the anarchist Prince Kropotkin (who was the first prisoner to escape from the fortress in 1873); Nikolay Chernyshevsky; Lenin's elder brother, Alexander Ulianov; and Josip Broz Tito, the Communist leader of Yugoslavia, who spent three weeks in the fortress in 1917 for his role in revolutionary activities. The last prisoners to be held in the Peter and Paul Fortress were the participants in the 1921 Kronstadt Uprising. archive.is
Tito knew stalin from time of (((Bolshevik))) revolution. And there is big chance he knew hitler from his time Vienna.
Also, he was a locksmith, Mercedes Benz test driver, Austro-Hungarian army fencing vice-champion and youngest sergeant major awarded the Silver Bravery medal on the Eastern front in Galicia,
Tito lived off the money of the kikes, well the money of the countries in the west the kikes ruled over.
After Titos death and the end of the cold war those money streams dried out. Yugoslavia imploded.
gavrilo princip is not a jew. you just made this up. you are funny
No. prove it if you can
yes, you should read about economic hitman.
Yugoslavia requested American aid. American leaders were internally divided, but finally agreed and began sending money on a small scale in 1949, and on a much larger scale in 1950-53. The American aid was not part of the Marshall Plan.[59]
The Reagan Administration is trying to put together an aid package worth roughly $1 billion to help Yugoslavia through a financial crisis arising from debts of about $20 billion.
nytimes.com
Exports $13.1 billion (39th) (1991 est.)[9]
Imports $17.6 billion (32nd) (1991 est.)[10]
Gross external debt $18 billion (36th) (1991 est.)[11]
From 1970 onwards, despite 29% of its population working in agriculture, Yugoslavia was a net importer of farm products.[25]
In the mid-1960s, Yugoslavia lifted emigration restrictions and the number of emigrants, including educated and highly skilled individuals increased rapidly, especially to West Germany. By the early 1970s 20 percent of the country's labor force or 1,1 million workers were employed abroad.[20]
The emigration contributed to keeping the unemployment checked and also acted as a source of capital and foreign currency. The system was institutionalized into the economy.[22] From 1961 to 1971, the number of guest workers from Yugoslavia in West Germany increased from 16,000 to 410,000.[23]
en.wikipedia.org
The subhuman poles always try to ignore people calling out their invasion of Czechslovakia and Ukraine too.
They are a subhuman, worthless race of niggers with white skin.
Reparations were paid to Yugoslavia in the aftermath of World War II. The State Reparations Commission of the Yugoslav Government estimated the total war damages inflicted upon Yugoslavia in World War II at approximately US$47 billion (1938 values: $1 = 44 Yugoslav dinars; Germany – 36 billion, Italy – 10 billion, Hungary – 542 million, Bulgaria – 650 million).
Negotiations between the delegations of SFRY and FRG, as well as the Tito-Brandt talks, resulted in the harmonization of the Protocol on Monetary Relief in 1972 (unpublished) and the Agreement on the Approbation of Monetary Relief in 1974 totaling one billion German marks under firmly favorable terms. Yugoslavia paid off two smaller installments and the payments were reprogrammed and postponed several times.
There are some controversies with regard to the interpretation of the legal nature of this agreement. An analysis of this matter points to a typical bilateral onus contract, taking into account the title of the agreement as well as the provisions on multiple matters, including the object of the agreement, parties, amount of credit, interest rate, terms of use, paying the credit off and deciding on which party would enforce this agreement.
However, in the introduction of the Agreement from 1974 it was declared that “in terms of the approval expressed in the Communiqué anent the visit of Chancellor Brandt to Yugoslavia, the remaining open questions from the past should be resolved through long-term cooperation in the economic and other fields with the objective to definitely fulfill this consensus”. This was an indirect way to associate the credit with the reparations through the so-called Tito-Brandt Brioni Formula.
For almost two decades the Yugoslav public was not aware of the existence of the 1973 Aide Mémoire or position paper (a declaration of the Yugoslav Government), which was the condition of the German negotiators for this credit. The existence of the Aide Mémoire was also concealed in the statement of the Federal Secretariat of Foreign Affairs from January 1990, which was issued due to a series of public requests and inquiries of the deputies of both federal and state assemblies on the payment for war damages.
The content of the Aide Mémoire is as follows: archive.is
BRIJONI, Yugoslavia, April 19—President Tito and Chancellor Willy Brandt of West Germany, meeting at this resort island in the Adriatic, agreed today to settle the 28‐year‐old problem of indemnification for World War II damage to Yugoslavia by adopting a program of long‐term economic cooperation.
A joint communiqué at the end of a four‐day official visit by Mr. Brandt said that it had been possible to settle outstanding questions of the past in the interests of both sides. It was stated that the term of the economic cooperation plan would be worked out in future negotiations.archive.is
I wasn't meant to be paid back
You just presented proof that he might have been a kike.
I doubt the USA did see it the same way.
It was international and subsidized Albanian settlers in the Kosovo.
you mean (((people)) that are running USA financial system ?
I would agree with that. But as history have shown this is common occurrence.
let us just say that (((people))) running USA are often misunderstood in (((their))) best intentions.
1941: Sixteen Yugoslav partisans and one German soldier
good thing is that (((Jewish))) etno state is still taking delivery of new dolphin class submarines that are nuclear capable for free. As part of war repatriations….right ?
It is only fair, there were 6 million (((jews))) killed in WW2. Yugoslavia only lost 1 million. It is only fair that yugoslavia pays back a loan…with interests.
Right ?
SYND 19 4 73 WEST GERMAN CHANCELLOR BRANDT MEETS PRESIDENT TITO
1941: Sixteen Yugoslav partisans and one German soldier
That reparations thing is overblown.
Reparations are a kind of robbery. Yugoslavia et all had no leg to stand on in 1945 and later to demand some, ie. no military to collect them, killed all Germans in reach so no ransom either. So some governments might calculate some imaginary sums they think someone owns them, but that is more to rile up the populace, for distraction.
He was also one hell of an agent, strategist and statesman. Everyone was afraid of him, even big world players. He had links with Kennedy, Qaddafi and other coincidence'd leaders.
He was playing both western kikes and soviet kikes, and that money was less than what banana shitholes of today take in loans to be kike's debt slaves. The system which he and his associates have created was something closest to what Hitler has imagined post WW2. You can't name a single other country that was closer to it than Yugoslavia. And it was truly independent, which is rare, especially for a Balkans country.
Also this, Yugoslavia fell apart because of direct sabotage, but all they did was apply pressure at already existing weak points (economic reforms, ethnic/religious tensions, etc.) There was no one good enough to succeed Tito so western kikes and their agentur ate it for dinner.
Just look at that face. Crna Ruka was a Jewish asset made to dismantle A-H and Serbs were just good goys as usual.
Let me teach you all something new. This what have you wrote is part of "official history". it is in all the books and all.
New, listen closely I am going to teach something that is very old and secret.
For the beginning let us take a closer look at expression "Crna Ruka". If we translate that to english it is black hand. Which does not mean anything. But, if we translate it to spanish (or italian) we get "Mano Nera" This is wiki for black hand
A June 1912 newspaper report in the New York Tribune stated that the Black Hand "really exists only as a phrase. As an organization such a thing never existed out of the minds of the police. It is a catch phrase made familiar through the newspapers, and the quick witted criminal of Latin extraction lost no time in using it as a nom de crime, which he wrote at the bottom of his blackmailing letters, sometimes – in fact, generally – adding fanciful decorations of his own, such as daggers dripping blood, revolvers spitting fire and bullets, crudely drawn skulls and crossbones and the inevitable sketch of a human hand." archive.is
as for history (and this is important part):
The roots of the Black Hand can be traced to the Kingdom of Naples as early as the 1750s.
You all may have heard of "mafia" Well, people who are members in what media call "mafia" do not call their organization "mafia". They call it cosa nostra (for example). Crna Ruka is what media calls "mafia"
"The word mafia derives from the Sicilian adjective mafiusu, which, roughly translated, means 'swagger', but can also be translated as 'boldness' or 'bravado'. In reference to a man, mafiusu (mafioso in Italian) in 19th century Sicily signified 'fearless', 'enterprising', and 'proud', according to scholar Diego Gambetta" archive.is
Franz Ferdinand Carl Ludwig Joseph Maria Archduke of Austria-Este, Austro-Hungarian and Royal Prince of Hungary and of Bohemia wasn't killed by serbs, he wasn't killed by (((jewish))) assets. Or even under orders from british intelligence.
He was killed by secret organization that has really no name and can kill one of the most powerful persons in the world (at the time). And consequently start biggest war in world history. Actually 2, WW2 was direct result of WW1
jews also appropriated it:
The Yiddish Black Hand or the Jewish Black Hand Association was a criminal organization that operated on New York's Lower East Side during the early 20th century, led by Jacob "Johnny" Levinsky…..This method had been used earlier by Neapolitan Camorristi, Sicilian mafiosi and others who preyed on Italian immigrants as the Black Hand. archive.is
You know how there are Illuminati…and Freemasons…Knights Templars ?
Well, there is organization that is controlling crime syndicates and have killed Archduke of Austro-Hungaria.
Well that explains your stance. How does it feel to have Putin and Tatar dick up your ass simultaneously??
Interesting, but Jews are essentially the oldest, and longest surviving crime syndicate in history. They were a bunch of desert bandits raiding caravans which grouped after their release from Babylon in order to create a "nation" which didn't have much in common other than geographic territory they were operating on and their criminality. Later they made a "covenant" with a certain entity (or a group) which provided them with a certain code of conduct which would gradually shape them into what they are today.
Could you describe such organization, what would be their goals and motives for doing it? It's hard to imagine a more powerful criminal network than international Jewry, whose rabbinical court (Kahal) controls pretty much everything, from IMF and World Bank to Freemasons. Especially since it's extremely hard to find traces of it, even for the most devoted conspiracy theorists. Everyone leaves some traces sooner or later.
The historic record regarding the Black Hand is sparse. Black hand is not even real name. There is record of existence of that type of organization. There are even some persons known as members. There is obvious influence on the events in world history. And this is basically it. But it is powerful. Powerful enough to change history.
This is in Palestine archive.is
The Black Hand (Arabic: , translit. al-Kaff al-Aswad) was an anti-Zionist and anti-British Jihadist militant organization in Mandatory Palestine. It was founded in 1930 and led until his death in 1935 by Syrian-born Sheikh Izz ad-Din al-Qassam,[1] whose preaching was instrumental in laying the foundations for the formation of the Black Hand, which he used to proclaim jihad and attack Jewish settlers.[2] The idea for such a group appeared to crystallize after the 1929 riots, though one source says a decision was taken after the Day of Atonement incitement at the Wailing Wall in September 1928.
I would say there is something like Omertà that is protecting information about it.
Omertà /oʊˈmɛərtə/ (Italian pronunciation: [omerˈta])[1] is a code of honor that places importance on silence, non-cooperation with authorities, and non-interference in the illegal actions of others. It originated and remains common in Southern Italy, where banditry or brigandage and Mafia-type criminal organizations (like the Camorra, Cosa Nostra, 'Ndrangheta and Sacra Corona Unita) are strong. It is also deeply rooted in rural Spain, Crete (Greece),[2] and Corsica, all of which share a common or similar historic culture with Southern Italy.archive.is
One more thing. This organization wanted to create yugoslavia.
It's a mystery my lad.
Churchil was a kike, sorounded by kikes. Tito was a plant sorounded by kikes. Whole partisan movement in Yu was filled with jews and mass murderers were exclusively jews. There isn't much difference between any jew run state, be it eu, ussr or yu
I don't have anything against Poles, but you must be one of the dumbest ones out there. And that's from an ethnicity famous for being the butt of jokes about being dumb.
Do not worry, as rotten as the british corpse is. There are some of us who wait with bated breath. Ere the saxon began to hate.
Seriously, nigger? Churchill was a total idiot.
Because we aren't a bunch of terrorists like the fucking kikes, you fed. Now do your goddamn job.
Nigger mentality at its finest.
This is why the krauts will always be preferred and poles will meet their end soon. Because they are worthless subhumans.
Why did the squirrel let the bear eat the honeycomb?
...
Is there any instance beside his military service that churchill didn't look repulsive?
Is that really what anglo shits consider peak "aethestic" for their subhuman people?
You don't? ok pal…if you think Churchill accepting American globalism, and Marshall Plan money in exchange to end with the british empire wasn't a stupid movve it tells me you're american, retarded or both.
Retarded amerimutt is an oxymoron.
(check)
Can't even blame them, given the awful state of Brit women
It was just a little bit, it doesn’t count! Unfair!