ITT I would like to discuss whether government, as we understand it, is valid as a concept by examining the two great governments that Europeans have birthed into the world and the outcome of these paradigms. BTW I am NOT an anarchist at all, in case you were wondering but I have spent a lot of time examining the principle and results of 'government' in my own mind and have come to the conclusion that everything we currently know of the paradigm of governance is invalid. And here is what I mean by that…
I would expect the most valid paradigms to be the ones that follow an evolutionary or emergent path, simply because this matches most closely with the natural (for lack of a better concept) 'resonant frequency' of Life. So ideal social organization should mimic superstructures and microstructures of life implicitly in order to function within the paradigm of Life. Currently we have a governmental superstructure that not only does not mimic either superstructure or microstructures but is antithetical to even human scale organizations. Man is the head of the house, woman is his compliment, children (Life continuance) are the result. If we compare our current ideology of government to the structure of the household we could draw a correlation between the male as the head of the house or authority. For my own purposes I want to simply focus on the relationship between males (governments) and their offspring (people) because this is the most pressing issue in terms of European survival.
This examination is important to me is because I believe that our governments are killing us as part of their operating principles. That since their inception their main operating principle is one of destroying and killing their offspring (the idea that mankind is nothing of value but exists only to be 'spent like water' in the service of a few parasites). So from the generating principle we recognize that the heads of our government are parasitic and not patriotic (fatherly care, [discipline and authority] for their offspring). Again, I am not concerned with the 'justification' for why governments are killing us but more concerned with the product of governments (the fact that we are being killed via our governments in too many ways to count). Also, can governments be valid in principle if they only result in our slaughter (they become a self limiting system on both sides)? The government will cease to exist at all without the people, as much as a household in which the father murders his own offspring will cease to exist.
[Side note: This is why I HATE the semitic homosexual occult theocracy, it has no 'stake' in the offspring of the fathers of the nations it rules. What does a homosexual care about the offspring of a man…his only concern is how they might be of service to him (sexually or murdered as cannon fodder while doing his bidding) so I am NOT A FAN of the mystery cults (jews, ZIONISTS, international banker 'belief SYSTEMS' ←- by their nature an artificial rather than Life based paradigm of operation.]
Back to the OP: Let me give an example; if the father and head of the household takes his children and ships them off to fight for a people who are unrelated to him or even his business interest and they die in service of that unrelated foreign business interest, how long would his house survive and how successful would it be? Or if a father allowed an outside interest to poison his children's food and did nothing to stop it, how long would his household stand? If a father allowed foreigners to take over his finances and rob from his own children how long would that household stand? If a father threw his own children out on the street and took another man's children into his house and fed, sheltered and cared for them, how long would his household stand?
Ok, so these are all sort of 'no brainer' questions that have obvious answers, we know that both government (fathers) and its people (children) are inextricably linked together as a nation (household) if they want to survive or have longevity. But here is what I want to really talk about…the two greatest governments that humanity has ever built up for itself have been efficiently and quickly subverted into destructive machines that slaughtered their offspring within own household. This would be like a father coming home from work and suddenly beginning to ax murder everyone in his household for no real reason. If we looked at the product of both 'Representative Republics' and 'National Socialism' you would think logically that these, being so different would have a different outcome that didn't result in the massive loss of life of the Offspring. But both were subverted rapidly (almost upon their foundation) and both resulted in the massive loss of life and destruction of their people. Again, I don't want to talk about the 'justification' for this but want to observe the results or outcomes for both systems (actually all systems of government have found themselves subverted and destroyed but international banking/ZIONISTS almost from their inception).
(cont…)
Parker Carter
It seems illogical to expect that two great governments, some would argue were the greatest governmental achievements in our world, with such vastly different characteristics would result in the same basic operating procedures or the murdering of the offspring. So what are we really looking at here with the idea of governments? What is the real operating guidelines of governmental institutions if they always churn out the same results. To me this is much like the joke we make about the jews being thrown out of nations.
Thrown out 1 time…the bartender might be a jerk…thrown out 109 times…there is another problem; probably not the bartender. But the same thing can be said about governments. They all fail, they all are quickly subverted and they all have the same result, destruction of the offspring. So that led me to the question…are they a valid paradigm for Europeans to pursue if the result is that they are easily overthrown/underminded and result in the murder of our people?
When comparing them to ancient systems of governance where our people thrived what can be learned about the paradigms and principles that are operating in both the ancient paradigms and the more modern destructive impetus of the 'state'. The reason that I bring this up is due to the push for a more totalitarian or fascist state that I often see pushed on Zig Forums…but I am very hesitant to commit the VERY LAST of my own people into the hands of something that seems like a monsterous devourer of its own offspring at this point. It seems illogical to continue to attempt to beat my own head against the wall trying to impose a system on the very remnant of our people that only exists to genocide us.
True democracy begins only when the will of the people gets carried out.
Ian Lewis
Government is a non-entity, it's just a reflection of social organization. Most modern govt's are mafia states reflecting medieval feudal order, ideal government would have absolute upwards pressure and would be made of the best individuals that a country has to offer, not a bunch of kikes and lowly thugs serving them.
Denying government is denying organisation. Of course, by government I don't mean just the typical (((civic state))) government.
And you can't really use NS Germany as an example, a proper allegory would be that a bunch of kikes come to your house and try to murder and kidnap your children, and you fight back, but they get killed in the process. We can see today that they would get killed anyway. Death while fighting to survive > Slow death as a result of decay
Kevin Young
We need to free ourselves from the jews like the founding fathers freed themselves from the British.
Lincoln Powell
Can true democracy be achieved while we are forced by government to select and follow leaders we don't desire? Isn't democracy voluntary? If democracy isn't voluntary it is 'totalitarianism' by another name. For example if a leader went back on their promises, by our own governments laws we are obligated to continue our commitment while they are free to lie and renig[ger] on theirs. Can true democracy ever occur in a codified system of government? If not, then what is required to have a true democracy? How does this compare to the systematized governments we have now as our 'representative repulbic'?
Isaiah Brown
The internet, a voting system based on blockchain and guns.
Ayden Ortiz
The whole ruling class of Brits are jews. Queen Elizabeth is a descendant of Mohammed and 'king' (the traitorous warlord) David according to Burkes Peerage. She is also a relative of the Saudi Royal family and many other prominent jewish global ruling households. For example, Kate Middleton is a Goldsmith/Rothschild and as the mother of the royal offspring they are all 'jews' by birth. So they are foreigners and not natives in European society, they have no genetic connection and no shared heritage with the Anglo-Saxon and celt peoples they rule over. So I guess that I would reframe that as 'we need to free ourselves from the jews like the founding fathers freed themselves from the jews.' It is always the jews/ZIONIST/international banking criminal mafia that is the problem.
