ITT I would like to discuss whether government, as we understand it, is valid as a concept by examining the two great governments that Europeans have birthed into the world and the outcome of these paradigms. BTW I am NOT an anarchist at all, in case you were wondering but I have spent a lot of time examining the principle and results of 'government' in my own mind and have come to the conclusion that everything we currently know of the paradigm of governance is invalid. And here is what I mean by that…
I would expect the most valid paradigms to be the ones that follow an evolutionary or emergent path, simply because this matches most closely with the natural (for lack of a better concept) 'resonant frequency' of Life. So ideal social organization should mimic superstructures and microstructures of life implicitly in order to function within the paradigm of Life. Currently we have a governmental superstructure that not only does not mimic either superstructure or microstructures but is antithetical to even human scale organizations. Man is the head of the house, woman is his compliment, children (Life continuance) are the result. If we compare our current ideology of government to the structure of the household we could draw a correlation between the male as the head of the house or authority. For my own purposes I want to simply focus on the relationship between males (governments) and their offspring (people) because this is the most pressing issue in terms of European survival.
This examination is important to me is because I believe that our governments are killing us as part of their operating principles. That since their inception their main operating principle is one of destroying and killing their offspring (the idea that mankind is nothing of value but exists only to be 'spent like water' in the service of a few parasites). So from the generating principle we recognize that the heads of our government are parasitic and not patriotic (fatherly care, [discipline and authority] for their offspring). Again, I am not concerned with the 'justification' for why governments are killing us but more concerned with the product of governments (the fact that we are being killed via our governments in too many ways to count). Also, can governments be valid in principle if they only result in our slaughter (they become a self limiting system on both sides)? The government will cease to exist at all without the people, as much as a household in which the father murders his own offspring will cease to exist.
[Side note: This is why I HATE the semitic homosexual occult theocracy, it has no 'stake' in the offspring of the fathers of the nations it rules. What does a homosexual care about the offspring of a man…his only concern is how they might be of service to him (sexually or murdered as cannon fodder while doing his bidding) so I am NOT A FAN of the mystery cults (jews, ZIONISTS, international banker 'belief SYSTEMS' ←- by their nature an artificial rather than Life based paradigm of operation.]
Back to the OP: Let me give an example; if the father and head of the household takes his children and ships them off to fight for a people who are unrelated to him or even his business interest and they die in service of that unrelated foreign business interest, how long would his house survive and how successful would it be? Or if a father allowed an outside interest to poison his children's food and did nothing to stop it, how long would his household stand? If a father allowed foreigners to take over his finances and rob from his own children how long would that household stand? If a father threw his own children out on the street and took another man's children into his house and fed, sheltered and cared for them, how long would his household stand?
Ok, so these are all sort of 'no brainer' questions that have obvious answers, we know that both government (fathers) and its people (children) are inextricably linked together as a nation (household) if they want to survive or have longevity. But here is what I want to really talk about…the two greatest governments that humanity has ever built up for itself have been efficiently and quickly subverted into destructive machines that slaughtered their offspring within own household. This would be like a father coming home from work and suddenly beginning to ax murder everyone in his household for no real reason. If we looked at the product of both 'Representative Republics' and 'National Socialism' you would think logically that these, being so different would have a different outcome that didn't result in the massive loss of life of the Offspring. But both were subverted rapidly (almost upon their foundation) and both resulted in the massive loss of life and destruction of their people. Again, I don't want to talk about the 'justification' for this but want to observe the results or outcomes for both systems (actually all systems of government have found themselves subverted and destroyed but international banking/ZIONISTS almost from their inception).
(cont…)
Parker Carter
It seems illogical to expect that two great governments, some would argue were the greatest governmental achievements in our world, with such vastly different characteristics would result in the same basic operating procedures or the murdering of the offspring. So what are we really looking at here with the idea of governments? What is the real operating guidelines of governmental institutions if they always churn out the same results. To me this is much like the joke we make about the jews being thrown out of nations.
Thrown out 1 time…the bartender might be a jerk…thrown out 109 times…there is another problem; probably not the bartender. But the same thing can be said about governments. They all fail, they all are quickly subverted and they all have the same result, destruction of the offspring. So that led me to the question…are they a valid paradigm for Europeans to pursue if the result is that they are easily overthrown/underminded and result in the murder of our people?
When comparing them to ancient systems of governance where our people thrived what can be learned about the paradigms and principles that are operating in both the ancient paradigms and the more modern destructive impetus of the 'state'. The reason that I bring this up is due to the push for a more totalitarian or fascist state that I often see pushed on Zig Forums…but I am very hesitant to commit the VERY LAST of my own people into the hands of something that seems like a monsterous devourer of its own offspring at this point. It seems illogical to continue to attempt to beat my own head against the wall trying to impose a system on the very remnant of our people that only exists to genocide us.
True democracy begins only when the will of the people gets carried out.
Ian Lewis
Government is a non-entity, it's just a reflection of social organization. Most modern govt's are mafia states reflecting medieval feudal order, ideal government would have absolute upwards pressure and would be made of the best individuals that a country has to offer, not a bunch of kikes and lowly thugs serving them.
Denying government is denying organisation. Of course, by government I don't mean just the typical (((civic state))) government.
And you can't really use NS Germany as an example, a proper allegory would be that a bunch of kikes come to your house and try to murder and kidnap your children, and you fight back, but they get killed in the process. We can see today that they would get killed anyway. Death while fighting to survive > Slow death as a result of decay
Kevin Young
We need to free ourselves from the jews like the founding fathers freed themselves from the British.
Lincoln Powell
Can true democracy be achieved while we are forced by government to select and follow leaders we don't desire? Isn't democracy voluntary? If democracy isn't voluntary it is 'totalitarianism' by another name. For example if a leader went back on their promises, by our own governments laws we are obligated to continue our commitment while they are free to lie and renig[ger] on theirs. Can true democracy ever occur in a codified system of government? If not, then what is required to have a true democracy? How does this compare to the systematized governments we have now as our 'representative repulbic'?
Isaiah Brown
The internet, a voting system based on blockchain and guns.
Ayden Ortiz
The whole ruling class of Brits are jews. Queen Elizabeth is a descendant of Mohammed and 'king' (the traitorous warlord) David according to Burkes Peerage. She is also a relative of the Saudi Royal family and many other prominent jewish global ruling households. For example, Kate Middleton is a Goldsmith/Rothschild and as the mother of the royal offspring they are all 'jews' by birth. So they are foreigners and not natives in European society, they have no genetic connection and no shared heritage with the Anglo-Saxon and celt peoples they rule over. So I guess that I would reframe that as 'we need to free ourselves from the jews like the founding fathers freed themselves from the jews.' It is always the jews/ZIONIST/international banking criminal mafia that is the problem.
Carson Taylor
QTDDTOT, nigger. This isn't your blog.
Joshua Wright
I’ve seen people point to the formation of Austria-Hungary as “the source of what the modern world considers “government” or “a country,” but I have no knowledge of this topic or the accuracy of this statement. I have a tiny niggle in the back of my head saying that they’re communists and this is communist propaganda, and that’s probably because of where I heard this said (alternatehistory.com). Does anyone else have any information on this being characterized as “the modern definition of government”?
Nolan Gray
This isn’t a single, effortless question, and it isn’t a blogpost. Zig Forums pre-kikey used to have ACTUAL, HIGH-LEVEL DISCUSSIONS about topics. I think it would be great to bring that back, since there’s nowhere else for us to discuss such things using OUR worldview.
Cooper Torres
I considered that but I am not sure about the blockchain security (I mean look at the government theft at Silk Road). I like your idea in principle and I thought it would be really fantastic if we could allocate our own tax money to services as we saw fit via the internet. Ideally we would simply sign on a server that was secure and allocate our funds by whole or percent to any interest or agency that we desired. You could do this annually or monthly…that is, if we agreed on taxation in the first place, technically, taxation is a result of the federal reserve, before the kikes started stealing from us on a massive scale taxation was unconstitutional. It only came being when they made us into slaves.
Order is fine so long as there are proper (((restrictions))) put in place.
Elijah James
I know only what I have gathered in inferences. That during what was classically called the Dark Ages, but were not actually dark at all; in fact an argument could be made that we are in the dark ages right now post industrial revolution and that what came before us was classed as 'dark' BY JEWS/MASONS because it was feudal rather than 'enlightened (masonic) governments' (not necessarily worse, but portrayed that was so that people don't discard 'modern government' in favor of Monarchy; not that much of a problem since all the 'monarchs' that survived the gradual purge and infiltration are jews anyway; why the fuck would we return to them?). LMAO they thing still that they are a 'light [not a blight] unto the nations'.
Anyway, there are some interesting observations made about the Dark Ages by Anthony Esolen and the structure of European achievement [vid 5 min] of the pre and early masonic era. I believe from reading occult histories of European families that the close bond between a Lord and their people remained through the Crusades, when returning knights and Lords, having seen the semitic empires treatment of their people began to distance themselves from 'common' Europeans and desire to live a more lavish and Lordly lifestyle off the peoples labor. In my opinion this was exacerbated by the increasing murder infiltration, inbreeding of European nobility with jews and their banking/zionist mongrel offspring.
Also, the Lords, nobles and knights who returned from the crusades had developed a taste for a more totalitarian expression of power while observing the muslim caliphates. So your kin and the bloodlines you were responsible became something disposable and to be treated with disdain rather than respected, cultured and cared for…those who returned wanted the lavish lifestyles of the international bankers; the deviance, robbery, torture for sport basically all of the more 'visceral' experiences (homosexuality/pedophilia/snuff sex) that were common and enjoyed in the 'abrahamic' cults and empires. There were some REAL TWISTED FUCKS that came back from the Crusades, not because of the crusades themselves but because of their exposure to semitic deviant culture.
Ok so long story short out of this nightmare of murder and infiltration of the European nobility was born the 'illuminati' who were supposed (/sarc) to enlighten the world with their mere presence. I believe that is what you are referring to when you talk about the Austria-Hungary 'modern governments'. I would also note that as the 'black nobility' (jew/muslim offspring of niggers) spread into the bloodlines of European nobility corrupting it (and this is noted and documented in occult histories) that the infected nobility became overwhelmingly obsessed with their own 'survival' and the survival of their bloodlines in that uniquely jew manner that is characteristic of their own psychopathic and guilt laden parasitic souls (they know their guilt and culpability for destroying the earth but it manifests not in ceasing this behavior or correcting it but in becoming more tyrannical and OCD/murderous.
So that isn't the 'official version' of what happened but it is what I have pieced together from looking at history and my own family history (as we had a Lord who cared for us as his subjects/our bloodline and people before we were transplanted from Germany to the USA).
Gavin Nelson
I wish we could return to that…the sort of 20 something MDE quips are funny for a little while but they are also the sort of worthless 4chanish like garbage I have come to expect from a 'common core' and videogame culture. I love them for their humor but nothing at all should or could ever be expected of them in terms of offering anything of value.
Eli Ortiz
Stealing bitcoins from one guy's computers after he was arrested while using McDonald's wifi isn't the same as stealing votecoins from hundreds of millions of people. It's a vastly superior system to what we have now.
Jordan White
Yes, Europeans are subservient by nature.
Ayden Rivera
Thanks, paid shill. I’m sure we believe you now.
Chase Hill
It could be as long as we could guarantee that it couldn't be hacked…or that people had the same flexibility with their vote as they did with their taxes. Let say, people could vote monthly (at the same time they were allocating their taxes or they could vote annually at their discretion)…we would want to keep the term short because we want LIARS to be held directly accountable for their behavior. This would put a lot of pressure on the parties to perform with noticeable results. Also, if you could change your vote mid-stream it might be harder to manipulate the votes…but who gathers and publishes the results, how can you be sure that everyone can see the final results of themselves and others voting…this almost guarantees a lack of anonymity (not that that is as important if we are not living in a totalitarian state…I mean no one would care who you voted for because it is not a matter of life and death like it is in a totalitarian state like we have now).
At this point, I honestly struggle to understand what is meant by "government". Obviously you have to have laws and authority, but when people say "government" that's not always all they mean. I would strongly advise against utopianism and making massive experiments with all of society. The state certainly is a traditional reality and something that has existed for all of human civilization. Any form of society that has not previously existed should be highly suspect, in the same way that communism is. A state that protects the race or kin is a traditional reality, and it's one that is impossible to jettison even as they try. Even multiracial abortions of states serve the Jewish race in the end. Whites cannot go without a state even with the danger of states, because A: there has never not been something like a state, and B: if you refuse to take up arms and enforce laws, someone else will. If you don't have a state, you will be conquered by those that do. Civilization always beats tribes, which is what colonialism proved, leaving niggers and natives salty for hundreds of years. They are not something to emulate.
Alexander Miller
Sorry for being a vargtard, but I do think that tribal societies best ensure the survival of their people. 1)A leader of a state cannot be a father as you envision it. No leader can hope to know the spirits of even 20,000 people and therefore must rely on vague notions of culture. A tribal ruler can over the course of a lifetime learn the nature of the say 200 people that he leads 2) A tribal ruler CANNOT be apathetic to his people. He is simply too reliant and connected to the tribe that he leads. His family for example would be be married into the tribe and he would know everyone in it. These factors mean that tribes generally would always do whats best for the survival and success of themselves
Juan Stewart
I don't see government as good. People should be free to associate and this will naturally form what I call a network of networks. You have a nuclear family + elders and cousins, that is your network. Then you have friends and through them you are connected to their networks. None of that should be forced. No government concept ever results in anything superior. Bureaucracy always results, and the letter of the law being followed is always the result instead of the spirit of the law.
I don't mind Varg, the only place I disagree with him, that I can currently think of is his insistence on interference between a person and their religion. It isn't his fucking business any more than it was the Catholic churches business and you are speaking to someone whose family was tortured to death often by Catholics until we were capable of fleeing their semitic influence I get a bit prickly at the hint of interference. I take someone interfering, attempting to interfere or sway my private religious beliefs very seriously (major killing time; as this attempted interference damages the spirit's growth and learning and not the physical body; thus it is more dangerous to the human than something that damages the spirit or overwrites a person's personal journey).
That aside, in my own personal view nationalism is simply a bastardized form of tribalism. But then I think political 'parties' work or fail based on the numbers of participants. For example, we know quite well that for 150 kinsman, communism works like a absolute dream, I have seen it myself in mennonite communities, there is a reason that they are the wealthiest, fastest growing demographic in the entire USA. So the ideal communist state is one of very tiny independant hamlets without a centralized government but with a confederated purpose (a lot like how I imagine Europeans would structure their Ethno-Globe into a series of confederated mutual interest communities based on proximity and resources). Democracy is one step higher than communism in terms of supporting a community structure…so I am guessing 5,000-10,000 people max can work as a functioning democracy. Nothing more than that though as people need to be able to gather and verify the results with themselves present in order to feel like there is no cheating in the results.
I think things like totalitarianism and fascism work with less intelligent (or the lesser races, like jews, niggers and shitskins) and I think because jew, niggers and shitskinned people are basically souless and half human that they actually need either totalitarianism or fascism to function. I mean they literally live and exist in such an animal state that they can't function as a 'human' without someone holding their hand the entire fucking time and explaining the 'rules' of being human to them. They even need someone to hold their hand on the shitter…basically they are little more than a 'pet'.
I posted this video in another comment but if you watch it, pay close attention to the structure of the government PRE MASONIC 'blight unto the nations' overthrow of the European royalty. This might be what you are thinking of…and I wish that someone with more knowledge of the structure of the City-State would come forward with an OP about that governmental structure of the Pre-'enlightenment' period. Video above:
I don't think that any of the famous confederated city states (before KIKE BASED 'national borders'; aka artificial and meaningless political tools of controlling Europeans) would have had a population quiet as large as you are envisioning…but I really need to look this up and verify the estimated numbers, obviously there was no census at the time (wait a second…Domesday book? IDK maybe there were census' of the populations of the city states, that would take some research). Otherwise I think it is promising for sure.
This is very interesting thought and some of what I was hoping to explore in potential in this OP. When looking at the natural structure of emergent systems and complexity we find a highly distributed network of increasing complexity towards the periphery; with nodal stations in a decreasingly complex scenario. see pict.
I think this is what the blockchain-user was envisioning. So i can't wait to see you hash it out a little more and share what is on your mind. Also, consider my previous comment on the scalability of governmental systems based on the number of people present in any given gathering or meeting…freedom with the individual, authoritarianism works best with your patriarch, communism with your kin, democracy with your confederated groups and IDK…not sure what would come after that…something new. So government itself would become a function of the number of people present and not a fixed prescription for people.
But there are literally so many natural systems that have never been tried or put to test. Thankfully we can model them and decide on efficiencies, but look at the microbiological idea of quorum (this seems appealing to me and I have no idea how we would work it out, but it seems far more moral and ethical that something like voting, I doubt you could fake quorum.). I guess I am just pointing out that because we were used as slaves to 'get the kikes this far' doesn't mean that we should emulate their manner or way of being or systems. They are short sighted, illogical and mentally defective.
I mean we are coming up to an age where the most amazing things on Earth are going to be possible for US to achieve and try…this is part of my push for an Ethno globe as well…looking into the future the capacity for sheer FUCKERY is so huge that it will require a unalterably unified people to face the technological challenges of the next 50 years (shouldn't it actually be the people who invented and produced the technology who enjoy its benefits)? The winning tribe will have to be welded together with one interest so tightly that it forms an unbreakable bond, one purpose, one people. Different 'Tribes' will war together and all humanity will eventually die from this explosion in technology as altruism and cooperation is not shared aspect of human beings towards one another, so it becomes a losing sum game to have more than one tribe in an advanced technological situation. There can be only one. :)
LMAO…gross! I am super glad you are too tired to explain that one.
Christian Morales
It's to fix corrupted behavior. The way it works is a bit complex… Well basically when some girl gets 100% pampered like a princess through childhood and is never told no while wealthy busyness man father is busy and absent managing finances. Well known fact is absent fathers lead to promiscuous behavior. The biggest mirror influence for the child is then the motherly example of a frustrated sex object ( Trump married some ho who did nude modelling. Trump still had a dozen escorts "appearing" around him. Example case Stormy Daniels.). Then daughter grows up with hormones guiding her to act. She is used to having everything she wants. This ends with her physically unable to understand why she shouldn't have sex with all niggers and dogs whenever she feels like. Example. Pic1 goes on facial abuse gets paid 200$ to do porn and goes again for a 2nd time her father is some Balthazar whatshisname vice president of goldman sachs worth hundreds of millions. I have some more documentation related to topic but mostly just ridiculous claims by Zig Forums like pic2 and only one peer reviewed research document.
If you are going to have govt you can only have trustee's for it to work. Corporations are what you should also be asking, should we.
Nathan Lewis
For example you have diversity quotas in the workplace across the western world now, varying from society enforced due to anti hate speech laws or direct quotas as well as gender quotas in america. Government enforce laws that can see you sued for not hiring non whites if you get 200 applications and only 5 are whites and you hire 3 whites. America being a type of unsettled frontier for many was an example of the more natural network model. Once you were free to own your own land and had a piece, you were largely left to your own devices. What did people do? They grew their families and got together for social events like holidays and major seasonal workloads like harvests.
It is a product of biology that we protect our own first. And it is a product of a government that we give away to the poorest in another continent instead of fixing our homeless and broken families within our own neighborhoods, disaster relief of all types is just a donation to unrelated strangers in distant lands. Those who willingly donate their own funds are free to do so, government sending out military and food packages acquired from tax money is unethical, when there are so many in need that the government should take care of first, if that were its function.
Isaac Scott
Natural systems are great. Another good system to look at is how bees and ants work. Many of them use the queen for making the next generation, but the queen doesnt command them, the biggest signals she sends to the colony are "im in danger / nest is in danger" "its mating time" "im dying" "im hungry". The workers and many other types of individuals in the colony decide when it is too crowded and to take baby queen larvae to a new location. The workers decide when there is a need for more dedicated food collection. The workers decide how to fight back. The workers decide to feed the queen. You get the picture. It is completely unlike a dictatorship. The queen is a servant of the colony. The queen is in essence below the workers in decision making, except in cries of help. They need her to reproduce. She needs them for everything.
William Hall
Also the queen in a ant colony doesn't have a lavish lifestyle because they are popoing out baby ants every day! A queen ant puts out 2500 eggs per day
Jordan Perry
I agree that spirituality is personal something you discover for yourself. But Vargs not forcing you to do anything, he just shits videos out onto the internet. There is also a large spiritual vacuum in the West as earnest critiques of christianity (eg Nietzsche) were transformed into the soulless post-1945 atheism that we see today. So imo varg often gets the wrong end of the stick he is useful in educating the spiritually bankrupt generations of today
Leo Gutierrez
Wonderful thread and great OP. It's too early here still for me to join the discussion in any meaningful way. Hope the thread stays up til later.
Sebastian Sanchez
saged for off topic The land whale story really had me laughing. So gross.
I think I might have a slightly different take on that one than you. I am glad to see these girls defiled, having met many of them I can assure you that, 1) they are not nice people and 2) they are in a position that none evidence of this is 'life ruining' in the slightest for them. They are not judged and will never be judged by the same standards that you and I are judged in society. The only reason that their parents want them back is to keep control of their investment not to prevent these types of situations from happening to them. These people marry as a contractual obligation between wealthy families for specific offspring. None of this makes any difference in their personal lives and as they age they will, married or not continue the same behavior on their own.
They live amoral lives and I will be honest with you, I doubt they have ever considered the idea of the slave morality that we take so much for granted. I have seen them (more wealthy than god) steal for pleasure and break up a lifelong friendship between two friends by convincing the one friend that his best friend stole from him. It was destructive and vindictive behavior that simply didn't need to happen at all, I watched her do it because she enjoyed destroying a lifelong friendship, not because she was in the slightest danger of being punished or caught. It took me months of collecting evidence to repair the relationship for these two guys…but I did it TO SPITE HER CUNT BEHAVIOR. Once she was done destroying their friendship I doubt she ever thought to what she stole, her destructive behavior other than as a 'funny incident with the peasants' or their broken relationship ever again outside of telling it to her confidants and them laughing over it.
They are destroying cunts who will never face a single repercussion for their behavior and deserve to be dragged into an alley and murdered while they are on one of their 'escapes' despite their parents 'protection' and self interest in their future potential power play contracts with other families. The males and the females are ALL LIKE THIS.
John Price
saged again I forgot to add that it wasn't like this was just one behavior I observed on her part. It was as if a wake of destruction and loss expanded out from her position everywhere she went. She was an absolute nightmare for everyone around her. So it is not like 'I came to my conclusion after one event' it was watching her and many others behavior and treatment of others for years and then came to this conclusion. Destroying parasites.
Noah Fisher
That is the way that our royalty used to operate in Europe before they were corrupted by semitic ideologies and disgusting semitic blood. The leadership would exhaust themselves coordinating the resources harvest, resource management in harsh winters, the health and welfare of their people, coordinating the defense of their people, etc etc. They were the servants of their people, sent to ensure that their own bloodline in the form of the peasants survived and thrived. It was not unusual for them to know their kin by name and station or to work alongside them in an emergency. This service was the function of nobility; to serve their people. They lived to serve.
The only place left that nobility occurs is within the bloodline offspring of peasants. The 'royalty' and 'leadership' have all corrupted their blood with jew and thus nigger blood ('black nobility') and keep to nigger values. Those who would not cooperate with the jew infiltration of our royalty were killed, thus the 'age of enlightenment' (the b-'light unto the nations') dawned upon the Earth. So our leadership and nobility is all gone, replaced by a disgustingly corrupted Criminal Mafia who do as they please to the entire Earth.
This is why I am not a monarchist…because there is nothing left of that destroyed nobility.
The queen ant has a vested interest in the colony because they have the same blood. This is not the case with our 'leadership' {mockingly} they are foreigners in our nations who keep to themselves and only breed among each other. They have no vested interest in our survival or our people. They are working very hard as JEWS/ZIONISTS (which is THEIR HERITAGE) to utterly destroy our nations and people. They completely hate and despise everything about us and are hoping that we will be slaughtered and killed in a terrible fashion, indeed they are actually FACILITATING THIS FOR US. No matter how many times they kiss babies, you should know that if they could they would take that child right from your hands and rape and torture it to death…all the better if it was in front of your face. They are your ETERNAL ENEMY put in a position of leadership over you in order to murder you faster and with the most violence and terror against your person and your loved ones.
True…shiting out internet videos is not forcing anyone. The problem is that these things (totalitarian ideologies) always start small with something innocuous, like banning speech or differing viewpoints. Then over time they ramp up they turn into full fledged nightmares. So Varg and his followers are actually creating the very same situation for others that happened to them (without understanding the ultimate outcome of engendering religious hostility between your own people).
By banning, ridiculing, aggressively hassling and belittling all forms of communication within your own people who have a different religion than you, you set up the prelude to intense religious persecution…after all when a local female leader disagreed with his murdering Death Cult, Mohammed only drew and quartered her after torturing her first, one woman; and now look at his legacy of religious persecution and slaughter; with the jews help, he has taken his murderous ideology global and our own people suffer every day from it every day.
But it all starts with not having the confidence that enables others to have their own spiritual viewpoint about the direction that they wish their own beliefs to proceed. I enjoy Varg, but he is setting up and sewing death among our people when he doesn't need to.
Men are not 'god' that they need to decide what happens in another person's beliefs. It would literally take me my whole life to explain 'my religion' to you because it is the composite of my entire life experience. Thus impossible for an outside judge to weigh in on or have an opinion about 'my religion' even if I did have the time to review my entire life with a human judge. Everyone else is the same, 'their religion' is fluid based on their life experience…so by definition no man should be considering himself the 'judge' of another since it is not within his capacity.
If a man cannot tell me every detail of 1 random hour of my life both yesterday and accurately predict to perfection 1 random hour of my life tomorrow in the future, he does not deserve to judge ANY of it, because he is incapable of any true understanding of my life or my religion or my experience. He can never display accurate knowledge of how I came to my understanding, conclusions or beliefs. Anyway…like I said, I like Varg but I feel bad that he is setting up our people for a future of death and destruction/religious contention between them. I mean of all the people on Earth, pagans should know better…right? How could they sew division within our own people after all the things that have happened to us (100 million dead at semitic hands)? Makes me sad…I don't want to talk about it anymore.
Luis Diaz
thanks :) can't wait to hear what is on your mind.
Joseph Jackson
Maybe its not, it was europeans after all who developed the ideology of Libertarianism. Without government meddling and restrictions europeans peoples for the most part would act in their own self interest, to benefit their group first and foremost.
This is the question that ive been grappling with for a while though: How do we keep a Libertarian nation state libertarian? The USA was at its founding the closest anyone has gotten to this ideal and as we have seen eventually became just another dominating government at odds with its original intent. Any type of government no matter how small or limited has the tendency to grow, to get more complex and to grow its bureaocracy. So is it just an inevitability that Any government will eventually grow and become tyrannical or be subverted by any number of actors? perpetuating a cycle of revolt against the tyrannical order, growth into one and revolt again? Or is there some way to reach true equilibrium and stable society for europeans?
This is what I am studying and I am hoping to usher in the Fourth Reich with what I learn a system of peace and stability that will last indefinitely but I am having to propose things that don't sit well with people yet (like Ethno-Globe and the genociding of all other peoples).
We can't allow subversion from without to enter into the equation if we are to enjoy stability and peace. The only way we can be sure that the ZIONIST/jews/international bankers will not subvert us is to wipe out all the nations that they have been successful at invading and completely corrupting. Only Europeans resist them and they will tell you this openly, that we stand in their way to forming THEIR idea global government.
We would form some sort of limited governance or tribal structure in an Ethno-Globe but it would probably not resemble anything that we have now…it might resemble something more like the city-states that were uniquely European in the 'Dark Ages' (which were not actually dark at all). Anyway, this and a few other issues will allow us to 1) preserve all life on the planet. 2) preserve the only culture that is peaceful (see the global peace index) 3) preserve the only race that exists in balance with nature. 4) preserve the only race that has contributed significantly to the advancement of humanity.
Asher Turner
Natural systems are great. Another good system to look at is how bees and ants work. Many of them use the queen for making the next generation, but the queen doesnt command them, the biggest signals she sends to the colony are "im in danger / nest is in danger" "its mating time" "im dying" "im hungry". The workers and many other types of individuals in the colony decide when it is too crowded and to take baby queen larvae to a new location. The workers decide when there is a need for more dedicated food collection. The workers decide how to fight back. The workers decide to feed the queen. You get the picture. It is completely unlike a dictatorship. The queen is a servant of the colony. The queen is in essence below the workers in decision making, except in cries of help. They need her to reproduce. She needs them for everything.>>11966760 Also 5) preserve the only race that is actually human, not some lower form of ape
