Every public organization or person whom has been an arbiter of truth has a public figure or representative or has stepped out into the light for all to see.
Most recently:
This gives the public the ability to vet these organizations or persons in order to determine their credibility and authenticity.
Q has no face. No figure. No representative that we can vet.
Q has no history, no connections.
Q is a coward who hides in the dark.
There is no information that Q has exposed more dangerous to ones well being to the likes of Julian Assange or Edward Snowden, but yet it remains in the shadows.
Why would anyone believe and put their trust in a figureless and faceless entity?
Q has no face
Jeremiah Bennett
Other urls found in this thread:
pollmill.com
washingtonpost.com
imgur.com
pastebin.com
imgur.com
imgur.com
imgur.com
webmshare.com
youtube.com
imgur.com
imgur.com
imgur.com
imgur.com
ar15.com
twitter.com
Jaxson Edwards
I'm no Qtard but that is retarded as fuck.
Blake Martinez
Why would anyone trust Assange or Snowden?
If the media portrays you favorably or gives you movie deals, then something is wrong.
Josiah Torres
I nominate pic related to be the face of Q. All in favor?
Noah Jones
Unfortunately for you here is right, identity must be stablished and yes he's a cuck for not hosting his own website.
Elijah Anderson
SAGE
Q are people like
Tracy Beanz
Baruch the scribe
farmer funk
Obobo Cool
and all these faggots
that are making money off of you buying t shirts
and making money off of your youtube views
fuck off and die
Ryan Ward
Except for the ones that haven't Chaim
Carter Wright
Q is LARP
Assange is dead
OP is faggot
Shit thread
Aaron Brooks
Q is no differnt than the "anonymous source" MSM always cites.
Gavin White
Why do you care?
Why do you care if he or she is faceless?
Why do you care if anyone believes them?