Gun rights in Europe

Will it ever be possible for European countries to get the same (or better) gun rights than Americans and how would this go?

Also, how would Europeans be able to arm themselves to the teeth before the collapse?
In the Netherlands the police will inspect your house (unannounced) once you have a license and they can take your license away for "subjective" reasons (example: Hitler posters in your home).

Attached: EU-GunBan-1.jpg (1170x610, 577.26K)

Other urls found in this thread:

independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/burglar-sues-homeowner-break-in-indiana-burglary-recklessness-criminal-a7145291.html
twitter.com/brianschatz/status/1025577455971647489
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Schatz
washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/01/06/czech-government-tells-its-citizens-how-to-fight-terrorists-shoot-them-yourselves/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I like our current gun laws. You must be over 23 to apply for a gun license. You have to attend a gun safety course, you must do a psychological evaluation and then you can buy a gun. Citizens can only buy standard pistols, and bolt action rifles usually for hunting.
I would be completely against american gun laws being implementing here.


You have a tyranical government, access to state of the art weaponary and nobody does anything besides complaining on the internet, so shut the fuck up

23? Why so damn old? 18 years is good enough and some pistols arent going to save you. Assault rifles are very reasonable.

As soon as USA ends the puppet control of European countries, that will progress naturally. Europeans despise their governments on the same level as Americans.

So why do they want to take them if we won't do anything?

Attached: davidFace.jpg (1024x683, 72.76K)

Anyone under 23 from his country is likely to hold the gun the wrong way around and blow their own head off.

No. Reminder that they don't even have constitutionally enshrined freedom of speech.
They won't.
Of course, because they have no rights.


It's about the right to defend one's self with the most efficient man-portable means available you cuck. Reminder that in the UK you're criminally liable if a burglar injures himself on your property.

It depends on the country

In France you can buy about anything semi-automatic

Yeah, you need a single shot weapon, so you can put it in your mouth and pull the trigger.
>>>/suicide/
Daily reminder that REAL Whites had their boys holding weapons since they could walk, just like the Vikings. If you didn't, then you are a faggot and not a man.

...

No, Europeans are inherently more submissive. American whites are descended from those who wanted to leave yearning freedom.
Of course Slavs never left Europe as much as the rest of Europe did, but it's a good thing for them that they have restricted guns as otherwise everyone would just shoot each other until there's one last man standing.

Gun rights ? LOL in Europe we don't even have the right to fart…
And anyway, with 60% of europeans being monkeys now, it would be crazy.

you're a massive nigger faggot, go kill some police and judges

Once you give up your right to bear arms, the government will never, ever give it back.

Just about every Europeans country (and Canada) have been cucked out of their fundamental right to defend themselves, and look at what the governments have done to the citizens since. Literally traded guns for shitskins.

Attached: bb8358a4f1328ab76160cdc6246a1169d23596a0504eecb4370140a31199ec8b.jpg (550x825, 122.2K)

you're not fooling anyone you mutt

spoken like a true yurocuck. this is the gayest shit ive ever read on this board.

There are no gun rights in Europe.
There are only gun privileges.
No. And Americans will soon lose theirs.
This is a very naive questions, given the fact that ZOG has systematically disarmed every W. Euro nation, but with special prejudice against Anglophone nations (including Australia.)
The jew does this by staging mass shootings.
See Port Arthur, Dunblane, Hungerford.
This is a proven method and the only reason it has failed in the USA despite repeated attempts, is because of that country's exceptionally robust ENSHRINED RIGHTS.
But those rights have already been seriously eroded and the jew will finally see success by simply repeating the method, while refining the propaganda response.
The Millennial generation has had enough and is eager to have guns be ZOG-only.
This will mean in the near future, if you want to own a gun in the USA, you will have to be in service of ZOG.
Tell me I'm wrong all you want, but it's getting close already.
The guns aren't spread equally, a minority hoards/collects large numbers of guns, while most don't own any.
The jew is patient and simply has to wait for the boomers and their children (Gen X) to die off.
Once Millennials are middle and old aged, America will voluntarily disarm.
But this is tangential, the question is Europe.
The answer is
NO, THE JEW WORKED VERY HARD TO SOCIALLY ENGINEER EUROPEANS TO FEAR GUNS, THERE IS NO WAY IN HELL THEY WILL EVER ALLOW THE GUN SITUATION TO ROLL BACK, EVEN A LITTLE

pathetic
as a part of gun safety people should be issued an original tokarev for a period of a month-half a year, and either they'll treat it properly and not have any accidents, or prove themselves to be too irresponsible for gun ownership.

This is why we need it lowered to 18. The whole UK is one big ass over crowded in bread Island. The more normal fags that an hero there the better.

The DOTR can't come soon enough

So what would be the best way to get guns in Europe?

Subhuman slave.

No, Europe. The slaves do not get to own guns.

Friendly friends in former Yugoslavia.

We actually do, and you don't seem to be from around here. Because you're a yuro newfag, I'll let you know pic related is a group of people who used automatic weapons to hold off the federal government four years ago by threatening a general insurrection. Obama shit his suit pants, and they only lost one man.

Now crack open your cooker and breathe deep.

Attached: Bundy_Cowboys.jpg (600x421, 66.82K)

Oh yes, Germany, the land of the free. This dude is delusional if he really believes these gun laws are reasonable. First you have to attend a shooting range for a couple of months, at least once a week or so, just to be qualified to take a test. Then, you have to keep going to the shooting range on a regular basis and prove it. Then you need a reason to get guns, either for sport, so you have to prove you are actually active in that sport, either you are a hunter and prove that you are actually a hunter or you have to be a "collector" and prove you are collecting shit. None of these categories make it exactly easy to just buy a fucking gun for home defense. "Defense" is not even a legit reason in Germany, not even for carrying a knife longer then 12cm, and a baton is completely illegal in public. And even if you get a gun after months of bullshit, you are not allowed to shoot it anywhere but a certified shooting range. And you have to transport them either in parts or locked up. And this fucking guy is proud to announce that 1 million people in Germany own 6 million guns. That's not even enough to give 8% of the population a single gun, that's nothing.
Rights behind a wall of bureaucracy are not rights at all.

You’re a defeatism shill

Similar here, but you have to be over 18 or 21 in some cases. If you hit the target good enough on a training range and prove you are not a murderous psycho will be issued a licence to get normal pistol or rifle, but you need to provide a special justification to get burst fire capable weaponry, supressors and other shit. You can in theory get a licence to own any kind of military grade system as a collector, but not a licence to use it.

independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/burglar-sues-homeowner-break-in-indiana-burglary-recklessness-criminal-a7145291.html

Toplel. If you were less submissive, then you wouldnt have the worlds highest population of kikes on Earth. And as everyone knows, kikes are the ones pushing for removing guns. So guess what you mutt, you are sleeping with a pet serpent on your chest, lying to yourself that the venom it pumps into you is harmless. It is just a matter of time, which drop of poison will be fatal to you.

Mentally ill people shouldn't get guns, though. I'm pro gun laws but I know a number of Americans that admit to having intentions of killing people as well as suffer from suicidal ideation and a slew of mental disorders and the fact they can get guns so easily is asinine to me. I think there should be deterrents in place for these types of people.

Oh sure, and I'd absolutely trust the (((government))) to objectively and fairly regulate and enforce that, just like they do all their other (((laws)))!

Pretty sure you shouldn't have a gun by the by, user. You're posting on notorious neo-nazi forum Zig Forums, and white supremacy has been ruled by Dr. Greenblattberg to be a (((mental illness))), gonna have to have the gestapo come and confiscate your firearms!

But they're not. The vast majority of America's population including the whites likely arrived on American shores in the last one hundred years. The arrogance on you to think you're comparable to the Founding Fathers is insulting and even during the American Revolution the country was split between loyalists and rebels. American whites are still very cucked to fuck to the extent that 37% of them voted for Hillary Clinton and vast amount of them refused to turn out to vote for big old Nazi meanie BLUMPF at all. I don't have an axe to grind with Americans but you guys romanticize your country and yourselves too much. You are NOT a Founding Father or a revolutionary and you have ZERO genetic ties to those people or their legacy. Please stop LARPing.

Gun rights aren't about giving guns away to criminals, criminals already have guns because they're criminals. Gun rights are granted to defend yourself from those very people.

forgot to include the very salient point that those immigrants arriving in America were mostly economic migrants looking to make money, not people who gave a shit about the history of the USA or the freedom it grants

psychological evaluations are a waste of time, anyone could lie on the questionnaire and mental health is very subjective

I can't believe I'm reading this on Zig Forums. Fucking shameful. We should just enact Aktion T4 to rid our genepool of coward subhuman genes like the ones this faggot has.
Then we can issue black site weapons to citizens without fear.
Win win.
Faggot.

Krauts need Hitler. No other option.

:^)

How dare u euro peasant d&c like this! Muh freedumbs! We saved you from hortler!

Not unless you purge away all the jews.

Owning arms should be a fundamental right. No license or registration required. Even machine guns or explosives shouldn't be excluded

Attached: 1510106407640.gif (500x284, 929.05K)

Most faggots here actually don't understand that you never have rights.
Rights never existed. You have protection and privileges granted by the community you live in or your sheer power and influence, be it from your men, your guns or your money. This is what leftists subconciously have right and what cuckservatives and alt kike lovers don't get.

This is also why you have guns.

Timely reminder of what the National Socialist attitude toward guns really is:

Attached: 995TS.jpg (808x330, 123.37K)

in the end might is always right. "The Government is just the mightiest motherfucker around. That's why it's so important to lift individuals up and lessen the influence of governments.

Attached: 1508207085815.jpg (1600x1064, 348.51K)

(((liability lawsuits))), the sad thing is you could be sued for almost anything these days

In my opinion a pistol is by far enough for self defense. It incapacitates almost instantly and may not even kill. I agree with my country's gun laws - pistols and hunting rifles are allowed after attending lessons/instructions (don't know what they are im guessing just teaching you how to handle and shoot at a range) and no major charges. Also if you have been in the military(which was mandatory some years before I became of age) you can have deadlier guns(usually a kalashnikov).
There is 0 zero need for an ordinary civilian to have an assault rifle.
user I ain't about to stage a coup and I'm pretty sure laws at that point don't matter and the ordinary civilian is no longer that.
The one actually cucky thing about our laws is that in home invasion we are not allowed to use a weapon more deadly than the invader's, the law basically expects you to enter a dual with the invader if he has a sword. You are allowed to use deadly force in risk of life though. You aren't allowed to "finish off" somebody if he runs or is incapacitated.

I disagree. It is much better to have communities that care about their local people.
Perhaps you want to say you want to get rid of megastates? Personally I prefer Hitler's system. It was actually very localized in each region.

Even leaving out muh freedumbs, an armed state produce extremely high quality infantry. The American civil war and Germany in the 30s proved this.
You sound like another cuckold. Do you hate Hitler too?

Yeah, nah, you're a cunt.

The only people who fear guns are the ruling elite, and the masses want guns for self defence, the only reason they we don't see massive protests in favor of gun rights is the same reason that we see giant faggot parades in every major European city, these faggot parades are huge, and they happen every year, and they have such a tremendous success despite the fact that the vast majority of the population would not and do not attend such events, this is because the role of the media in mass protests is central. People who measure a movements popularity simply by how the (((media))) treats the issue is a moron.


Someone should beat you in your head with a rock.

Are that insistent on self arming? Upon such events a supply chain can be established. But keeping a bunker's worth in you attic? And I never said I was against arming. In fact somebody with military training is better than just guy with a gun. Basically the state ensures you know how to use a gun to have one, like a driver's licence. And your one to talk when a tranny can flaunt its guns next to its dragon dildos. Maybe if you stopped sucking the barrel like a faggot you could stop calling anyone who doesn't conform to your obsession a cuck or against Hitler. Enjoy your ghetto niggers that can easily get guns due to massive circulation.

It's not called the bill of "needs", you stupid nigger.

we can get our hands on repetitive rifles but they wont me of much use in a war, automatic rifles can be accuired by registration but will be raided and removed as soon as the race war breaks out in europe.
already, owning a pepper spray and using it in defense will get you a weapons ban and your home will be raided.
in england a based politician was raided and imprisoned for 8 years because he owned a copy of Mein Kampf and a pepper spray.

a hard fight is coming, everyone must prepare.

Rights are spook


Black market. You can buy AK for 500€ in Brussel

There is zero need for air jordan trainers.
Lots of americans (of colour) get killed for air jordan trainers.

QED, Ban air Jordan Trainers and execute Michael Jordan.

Attached: 5e20e86e4192edea1f778ea0fa105586ad90a0c4862519c9ca6ad2ba3d3035f9.jpeg (640x640, 42.33K)

I agree. If the community is made up of strong individuals which gives it the power. And not lesser to the community

Yeah well people are thinking everything about me while not knowing anything

Nice example of doublethink

Dey od sagings like of, but is nod XDDDDDDDDDD

Attached: 5a7644da97e703bab4fa638f149ea69bbd11053e24ae66a7b3bdfcdd37c0ff65.png (500x457, 170.62K)

Unlike your cuckolded dystopia, there won't be millions of subhumans in my utopia.

it wont be 500€/piece when everyone needs them, and 500€ is probably for a used one, which puts you in additional danger in case you get caught.
the smarter way and the only way is to get them legally and start the fight as soon as they take away the gun rights.

It'll probably be a form of hate speech to even entertain the idea of having gun rights restored.

It is no right.

A bureaucrat may decide any day that you are no trustworthy enough to own a gun and seize your expensive gun collection on day to the other.

Lack of trustworthiness would be for example, asking for a certificate of German nationality. That is regulated in valid German law, but that might indicate you are a Reichsbürger and Reichsbürger are the new chosen enemy of the government.
So no (more) guns for you uppity citizen.

A change in gun right in Germany? Only after the current regime is removed. They made it very clear, for the non brainwashed, that are still able to parse a whole sentence, that they hate the Germans and want to see them dead.

You can't get an AK-47 legally in most European countries

It is not even possible to get "AK47" anymore, faggit. You are likely to get an AKM.
Ignorance kills.

Everyone: please spread this!

United States Senator (((Brian Schatz))) tweeted he agrees with Sarah Jeong. That means a sitting US Senator believes all whites must be exterminated.


twitter.com/brianschatz/status/1025577455971647489


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Schatz

I was so pissed off I didn't read this cuckpost throughly. This retarded subhuman nigger really doesn't know the marksmanship situation of the US armed forces.
The "qualification" is fucking pathetic.

Gun rights aren’t rights. They are obligations of a civilized society. A population that can’t be armed is a society that can’t exist……..
Hello FBI lady

There is no difference between an "assault rifle" and "hunting rifle". Also for home defense, there's nothing better than a shotgun. It's stopping power without penetrating into your neighbor's house. Furthermore, if I want to buy powerful weaponry with no practical use aside from becoming the neighborhood armory , there is no reason I shouldn't be able to. Name the mass shooting that happened because a citizen had a tank, battleship, or high power mounted machine gun.

Kindly get Fucked.

An assault rifle is a select-fire long gun chambered in an intermediate cartridge and is the optimal platform for a close to mid range firefight. A hunting rifle is typically a semi-automatic or bolt action long gun chambered in a full-size rifle cartridge that is frequently paired with a high magnification optic. This is the optimal platform for eliminating a threat before things turn into a firefight.
Extremely low capacity and low rate of fire unless you're using a mag-fed semi-auto shotgun, and those aren't exactly reliable home defense weapons as shot shells will deform over time in those magazines and you really don't want a fucking feeding issue in an HD situation. Extremely high chance of a one-shot stop on an unarmored target? Of course, but you've got the same with M193 out of an AR with sufficient barrel length to reach fragmentation velocity.
Unless you're in an apartment with just some drywall separating things, that's not your problem, and even in that situation, buckshot still goes right through drywall and will kill whoever is on the other side.

The ideal HD weapon is always going to be some flavor of AR.

You do know that the vast majority of soldiers in firefights never even use the full-auto setting right?

Full-auto is only useful for squad automatic weapons and dedicated MG roles.

Then there is no reason not to have it :^)
A 5 round burst of 5.56 is an actual manstopper
Faggot

You don't even have any argument nigger, there is literally no use for full auto, on the squad and personal level outside of suppressive fire.

If you want to define assault rifle as having the capacity to switch to full auto or something other than semi auto, fine but I consider those to be a machine gun or at very least military rifle. "Assault rifle" has come to mean any semi auto rifle.

As for the magnification, that is not inherent to the gun, and most if not all "assault rifles" can easily mount some good optics. My point is any hunting rifle can be used for assault, and any assault rifle can be used to hunt (assuming you're going for the right game. An ar15 chambered in 22 won't take down a deer).

And yes in an apartment, your neighbors are sol if you use anything more powerful than a rubber band shot from you finger.

isn't an AR-15 it's simply a completely different rifle made to look like an AR.

Why do you justify criminalising someone that owns a automatic gun when it's not useful?

Do you not believe in individual rights?

Then why shouldn't I have it, faggot?

I never said you shouldn't be able to have it, are you people actually retarded?

And you are actually retarded if you think you need it.

Yes. Soon after inevitable transformation of EU countries into caliphates. BASED.

Well there is Czechia

washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/01/06/czech-government-tells-its-citizens-how-to-fight-terrorists-shoot-them-yourselves/

Don't be retarded. They aren't going to allow YOU Europeans to have guns. The only thing they want from you is to rape/fuck your women and get some of that higher quality IQ DNA in their genetic offspring, their own women are retards in comparison to yours. They have more value for your women than you do. But it is the power of the European females DNA and their creation principle that they want. You aren't even a secondary thought in their plans. Just like the jews have murdered en masse European males with their 'centralized' and planned war games, they are going to murder you as soon as they get the signal to do so. That fuck KIKE Ingativ says so point blank, that they want to exterminate you to breed with your wives, daughters and some of you, your mothers. Everything they are doing is an attempt (albeit futile) to regain the IQ that they lost by fucking niggers with their rapemixing. THere isn't a race alive that doesn't want to fuck your women to get a step up genetically…this means you are going to be 'out of the picture' as soon as they can arrange it.

You got it right.


Thing is mechanisms that empower individuals and communities go hand to hand, mechanisms for suppression them too. In the end communities consist of individual citizens. If state has arbitrary powers to disarm individual citizen or ban his free speech state can do the same to entire community, just do it to all its members one after another.

You do know that the vast majority of home invasions occur within throwing distance of the aggressor, and thus F/A is objectively superior for getting as many rounds on target as quickly as possible to instantly nullify the threat, right?

You know that SWAT, who encounters threats in precisely the same situation as your average home defense scenario uses F/A rifles and subguns, right?

KYS fudd.

No it's not fuckwit, at those distances it's fucking impossible to miss anyway, you just need the rifle oriented along your body and you can hit them.

You're a retarded faggot, with gay faggot fantasies, kill yourself.

LOL, show you mine 1951 type 1 AK?

Which is why having F/A which allows a massively increased rate of fire is objectively better for CQ, which is exactly why F/A firearms are used in those situations by LE when they're prepared and facing a determined aggressor. I'm glad you're starting to see reason on the subject.

...

Reminder: anyone (like this jew) who wants to disarm you wants to enslave you.

How does that boot taste, faggot?

Yes, but it will be only during the time of civil unrest. When the problem can no longer be contained munitions depots will become vulnerable targets.

Lots of people use AR-15s chambered in .223 to take deer including me.

If you hate authoritarianism then why are you on a National Socialist board?
National Socialism has sensible gun control, unlike America which give rifles to niggers and schizos outright.

Attached: f21d68addf5e37eaf95e6e74f76e65d9cb6cd5cdf216f711c150efe800a1aaa7.png (500x521, 139.12K)

I think strict gun laws/rights are actually a "good" thing considering it forces those who want to change their country to think means other than just picking up your gun and then going 'pew pew' on the ruling elites heads.
The way i see it, your average Merican can be kept content in the leash as long as their guns arent touched… much so they end up taking the passive stance and going all
Which they never do because they know what'l happen so better just take away everything else and let them hole up in their bunkers fellating over their guns.

Incredible D&C, Chaim, but I'm afraid we're a little too smart to fall for it.

And many of those "guns" are just stupid gas pistoles or some bullshit that simple go into the stats as "guns".

Someone should go "pew pew" on your head, you fucking kike.

What's the terminal stage of paranoia? Nobody knows, someone always shot the guy before it occured, (but to be sure, you lose your character)
Do you think people would just let a schizo prepare for a shooting like certain tri-letter agency did multiple times in the past?

Europeans don't deserve and can't be trusted with the right to own guns.

Who's saying we think America's gun laws are perfect? Everyone on this board would agree that we should change the law to only allow white to have guns (even though they country was founded for free whites only, and the rights in this country technically only apply to whites).

So they can engage in meaningless activities like voting?

If any of these replies are genuine then I think OP’s question is answered. If anons on Zig Forums (who I assume are aware of the murder and rape and chaos and incoming strife that Europe faces) are so deluded that they think being defenseless is a positive thing then there is no hope of change. Governments (with perhaps some exceptions like the Czech Republic) without doubt would much prefer you dead than have the rights to self-defense. The only thing that would convince them would be if it were a sustained pressure from a significant proportion of the population and single policy parties formed around the issue and threatened their power. Then and only then MIGHT (and they would probably sooner massacre everyone advocating for self-defense rights) something like 2A be implemented.

Never going to happen. European Governments for the most part have open genocidal hatred for their native citizens, why would they give them guns?

This thread makes me sad. Why are other Europeans so anti gun? Are you guys retarded?