Audio Book: Positive Christianity in the Third Reich by Professor D. Cajus Fabricius

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Program

We demand freedom of religion for all religious denominations within the state so long as they do not endanger its existence or oppose the moral senses of the Germanic race. The Party as such advocates the standpoint of a positive Christianity without binding itself confessionally to any one denomination.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler

Article 24 of Hitler's National Socialist Programme of 1920 had endorsed what it termed "Positive Christianity", but placed religion below party ideology by adding the caveat that it must not offend "the moral sense of the German race".[138]

In Jan. 1934, Hitler angered the churches by appointing the neo-pagan Alfred Rosenberg as official Nazi ideologist.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Rosenberg

Alfred Ernst Rosenberg (German: [ˈʀoːzənbɛɐk] (About this sound listen); 12 January 1893 – 16 October 1946) was a German[1] theorist and an influential ideologue of the Nazi Party. Rosenberg was first introduced to Adolf Hitler by Dietrich Eckart and later held several important posts in the Nazi government.

The author of a seminal work of Nazi ideology, The Myth of the Twentieth Century (1930), Rosenberg is considered one of the main authors of key National Socialist ideological creeds, including its racial theory, persecution of the Jews, Lebensraum, abrogation of the Treaty of Versailles, and opposition to degenerate modern art. Unlike most other Nazi leaders, he is known for his rejection of and hatred for Christianity,[2] having played an important role in the development of German Nationalist Positive Christianity.[3]

In January 1934 Hitler had appointed Rosenberg as the cultural and educational leader of the Reich.[35][36] The Sanctum Officium in Rome recommended that Rosenberg's Myth of the Twentieth Century be put on the Index Librorum Prohibitorum (list of books forbidden by the Catholic Church) for scorning and rejecting "all dogmas of the Catholic Church, indeed the very fundamentals of the Christian religion".[37]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Myth_of_the_Twentieth_Century

Hitler awarded the first State Prize for Art and Science to the author of The Myth of the Twentieth Century. The official document accompanying the prize "expressly praises Rosenberg as a 'person who has, in a scientific and penetrating manner, laid the firm foundation for an understanding of the ideological bases of National Socialism.'"[5]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_persecution_of_the_Catholic_Church_in_Germany

On 22 March 1942, the German Bishops issued a pastoral letter on "The Struggle against Christianity and the Church".[69] The letter … accused the Reich Government of "unjust oppression and hated struggle against Christianity and the Church"

The letter outlined serial breaches of the 1933 Concordat, reiterated complaints of the suffocation of Catholic schooling, presses and hospitals and said that the "Catholic faith has been restricted to such a degree that it has disappeared almost entirely from public life" and even worship within churches in Germany "is frequently restricted or oppressed", while in the conquered territories (and even in the Old Reich), churches had been "closed by force and even used for profane purposes". The freedom of speech of clergymen had been suppressed and priests were being "watched constantly" and punished for fulfilling "priestly duties" and incarcerated in Concentration camps without legal process. Religious orders had been expelled from schools, and their properties seized, while seminaries had been confiscated "to deprive the Catholic priesthood of successors".[70] The bishops denounced the Nazi euthanasia program

Attached: 3.jpg (628x773 330.28 KB, 66.96K)

Oh… It changed my ID. Interesting.

...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Pius_XI_and_Germany

As the extreme nature of Nazi racial antisemitism became obvious, and as Mussolini in the late 1930s began imitating Hitler's anti-Jewish race laws in Italy, Pius XI was perturbed. In the 1930s, he urged Mussolini to ask Hitler to restrain the anti-Semitic actions taking place in Germany.[48] When the newly installed Nazi Government began to instigate its program of antisemitism, Pope Pius ordered the Papal Nuncio in Berlin, Cesare Orsenigo, to "look into whether and how it may be possible to become involved" in their aid. Orsenigo proved a poor instrument in this regard, concerned more with the anti-church policies of the Nazis and how these might effect German Catholics, than with taking action to help German Jews.[49]

Following the Anschluss and the extension of antisemitic laws in Germany, Jewish refugees sought sanctuary outside the Reich. In Rome, Pius XI told a group of Belgian pilgrims on 6 September 1938, that it was not possible for Christians to participate in anti-Semitism:"[54] "Mark well that in the Catholic Mass, Abraham is our Patriarch and forefather. Anti-Semitism is incompatible with the lofty thought which that fact expresses. It is a movement with which we Christians can have nothing to do. No, no, I say to you it is impossible for a Christian to take part in anti-Semitism. It is inadmissible. Through Christ and in Christ we are the spiritual progeny of Abraham. Spiritually, we [Christians] are all Semites"[55]

On 11 November 1938, following Kristallnacht, Pope Pius XI joined Western leaders in condemning the pogrom. In response, the Nazis organised mass demonstrations against Catholics and Jews in Munich, and the Bavarian Gauleiter Adolf Wagner declared before 5,000 protesters: "Every utterance the Pope makes in Rome is an incitement of the Jews throughout the world to agitate against Germany".[56] On 21 November, in an address to the world's Catholics, the Pope rejected the Nazi claim of racial superiority, and insisted instead that there was only a single human race. Robert Ley, the Nazi Minister of Labour declared the following day in Vienna: "No compassion will be tolerated for the Jews. We deny the Pope's statement that there is but one human race. The Jews are parasites."

Attached: 5.png (1500x1151 61.91 KB, 223.98K)

care to explain this?

biblehub.com/niv/romans/15.htm

Accept one another, then, just as Christ accepted you, in order to bring praise to God. For I tell you that Christ has become a servant of the Jews on behalf of God’s truth, so that the promises made to the patriarchs might be confirmed and, moreover, that the Gentiles might glorify God for his mercy. As it is written:

“Therefore I will praise you among the Gentiles;
I will sing the praises of your name.”

Again, it says,

“Rejoice, you Gentiles, with his people.”

And again,

“Praise the Lord, all you Gentiles;
let all the peoples extol him.”

And again, Isaiah says,

“The Root of Jesse will spring up,
one who will arise to rule over the nations;
in him the Gentiles will hope.”

biblehub.com/niv/romans/15.htm

For if the Gentiles have shared in the Jews’ spiritual blessings, they owe it to the Jews to share with them their material blessings.

Attached: 4.jpg (679x480 93.13 KB, 122.01K)

the christian idea of salvation through jesus christ alone simultaneously denies the importance of race, sexual dichotomy, intelligence, physical health, aptitude, "virtue morality", and everything else that is not jesus christ/trinity.

europe largely did pretty well because europeans largely ignored those poisonous & evil christian ideas in favor of native european ideas, but advances in technology like the printing press resulted in the broader dissemination of these evil christian ideas, and that - combined with the disastrous results of World War II (reminder: Hitler persecuted Christianity) - led to present-day "late stage" christianity in society where racism is a sin and christian priests marry interracial couples in christian churches.

among other things, interracial cuckoldry is evil and your christian faith cannot change that.

Attached: 5.jpg (567x760 413.49 KB, 374.98K)

Christianity neither supports nor condemns a white nationalist society. It has nothing to do with worldly functions. It's simply about the life, death, and resurrection of Christ. It shouldn't be used in conjunction with white nationalism/ National Socialism or any other political ideology.

It is true, however, that western Europe was vastly more racially homogenous when Christianity still had a strong foothold on Europe. There is a correlation between irreligion and the "cuckedness" of a nation. The most irreligious nations tend to be the most cucked in terms of politics and demographics.

Thanks for the sperg-out, schlomo

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Éliphas_Lévi
Read about this catholic communist and then tell me that catholicism isn't just communism in disguise.

Good thread, OP.

Negated.

Attached: img_0799-001.jpg (629x1025 210.49 KB, 412.19K)

I’m gonna be honest
Christianity Centers your heritage and history on dessert dwellers about 2-3k years ago
Then frames the more recent centuries on the growing cult of Christ.
Most of Europe wasn’t even Christian by country 1000 years ago, and nearly all non kings didn’t practice it for many centuries after until various heresy hunts started.
I can’t say I support being or acting Christian in this day and age as anything more than a crypto trick to get ahead in some Christian communities.
Kids should learn reason and logic at home instead of Semitic fairytales. Aka Greek ancient culture as a frame, your national culture as a centre.

Wew, you hooknose fucks are working hard as usual. Spreading that same old narcissistic lie that the Old Testament is about jews.
Adam and Eve? Not jews. Noah and his family? Not jews. Job? Not a jew. Ruth? Not a jew. Who is the highest, most powerful priest mentioned in the Old Testament? The one over even Abraham, the father of all Hebrews? Was it Aaron, Moses' brother?
Nope, it was Melchizedek, the gentile Priest King of Salem.

Time to deal with a sad, sad fact, kikes
THE BIBLE ISN'T FOR YOU, IT'S TO WARN US ABOUT HOW DEGENERATE YOU SATANIC FUCKTARDS ARE

Attached: hellflag.jpg (528x390, 19.78K)

You do realize 'Positive Christianity' was just a ruse, right?

Attached: National Socialism and Christianity.jpg (1960x8280, 4.66M)

whatever you wish, fag.

I (OP) am not Roman Catholic and neither was the author. Tailor your attacks accordingly.

Of course Wikipedia, which is edited by Israelis, video related, is going to try to paint the NSDAP as non-Christian. That's the whole issue that this book is dealing with… The Jewish and Marxist propaganda, which you're regurgitating, is intended to make other nations turn against National Socialism. You're quoting Israelis, I'm quoting a member of the NSDAP

The Christianity of National Socialism is not a superficial one. The Christian worldview is the basis of the Nationalism found in National Socialism.

You're engaging in eisegetical cherry picking. Read Romans from start to finish in one sitting and it will make more sense. It doesn't mean what you think it means.

The author talks about you. Perhaps you may wish to hear his arguments.
No, he went after a bunch of traitorous Priests which were almost entirely from the territory that Germany reclaimed from Poland. The territory that had been occupied by communists, surprise surprise.
Golly, you don't say?

It is God who defines the nations. They are his conceptions, not the arbitrary inventions of man. This has to do with the God ordained order of things.

Who exactly do you suppose has been the primary force promoting the education of logic and reason for the past few thousand years…? In my little church we teach children biblical Greek.

Remember that Abraham was declared righteous by God for his faith before he was circumcised.

Attached: Israel, Jews, Zionists Seminar Takeover of Wikipedia Online Information to Implement Disinformation-hMBramnCg_s.mp4 (320x240, 5.52M)

Attached: The 'Accomplishments' of Christianity in One Image.jpg (1068x1744 247.9 KB, 487.06K)

This is nothing more than the equivalent of Mike Enoch screeching "MUH CONTEXT" over and over whenever his Jewishness is revealed.

Well considering Christianity didn't exist prior to like a 2,000 years ago and wasn't heavily practised by the European folk until like 1,000 years ago, that sounds like bullshit from someone who wants us to forget that the Romans and Greeks were doing that shit better and before.

Protip: Cajus Fabricius left the National Socialist party in 1940 and wound up in a concentration camp.
Pics related.

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (988x1181 891.24 KB, 891.24K)

see

the christian idea of salvation through jesus christ alone simultaneously denies the importance of race, sexual dichotomy, intelligence, physical health, aptitude, "virtue morality", and everything else that is not jesus christ/trinity.

are you sure about that? how many jews were in Western Europe before christianity?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_groups_in_Europe

the Jewish diaspora reached Europe in the Roman Empire period, the Jewish community in Italy dating to around AD 70 and records of Jews settling Central Europe (Gaul) from the 5th century

Daily Reminder that the last Pagan Emperor of Rome - Julian - attempted to drive the Jews back to the Levant and to use them as fodder for combating the Persians.
He offered - more like demanded - they rebuild the temple at Jerusalem and get the fuck out of Europe, as he viewed them as a hostile factor and one which was associated with the rise of Christendom in European lands, which he - having been raised as a Christian, and having rejected that Semitic cult - found distasteful.

Then he was a replaced by a Christian who 'persecuted' the Jews… by letting them stay in European lands.

Nope, try again, paid jewish shill.

Got a source for that?

The wording in those pics make it very clear that this is being written by a source hostile to National Socialism. I have to wonder why you're referencing such a source. It's convenient that you didn't identify who they are either.

sage

credit for the following text goes to the other poster(s) that wrote it:

Some are obviously JIDF. Some. The rest are mentally deranged semitic worshipers. Each of them have their own headcanon that revolves around denying objective incriminating flaws with christianity. There's no consistency with any of them. They get proven wrong and called out, then they show up in a new thread to recycle the same old points.

Here's some off the top of my head:
Bonus: look up testimony on how it used to be customary to kiss the pope's feet if you visited, but never for the rothchilds
^This is not an exaggeration. A semite worshiper has said this on Zig Forums, with no irony or sarcasm. For that matter, everything I'm listing has been said multiple times across tons of pointless threads
> [placeholder for pathetic attempt to excuse the (((holy roman empire))) in pagan genocides and burning of libraries]
^ The reference to babylon is explicitly a callback to when jews were kvetching about babylon in the old testament - jews saw rome as the new babylon
> [placeholder for pathetic attempt to disprove that (((jesus))) literally and only hated the pharisees and thus christianity is originally just jew infighting and saul of tarsus saw it as an attempt to make a cult to control whites aka gentiles]
Note: All placeholders represent major flaws that no semite worshiper has ever answered, because they can't.
Note 2: I am very sure I missed many pointless semitic worship recycled delusions, but if you think this list is long, an exhaustive list would be way longer.

For good measure, because of a definitive lack of actual historical evidence, it's far more likely that saul of tarsus invented the jesus story. Every non-biblical historian mentioning jesus only mentions him because they were noting their observations of christians, who were observed as odd characters. There are two exceptions. One was a gentile historian that worked with the early christians. Archeologists have learned over time that all of his work is fraudulent. Most damning is that his source was a jewish historian. I reiterate: there is an actual and verifiable case that (((jesus))) is not just a fictional invention, but his story was invented precisely when saul of tarsus was sending letters, and this easily explains why some of saul's references to (later) new testament details do not match up.

Why would they? Christcucks never argue in good faith. If you read his post, you read every christian thread on Zig Forums.

Attached: 3.jpg (800x600 605.46 KB, 606.15K)

ID: 000000

Attached: torball02.jpg (424x351, 19.31K)

sage

credit for the following text goes to the other poster(s) that wrote it:

"True christianity" as you call it has never existed. Christiantiy has always put its jewish dogma before truth. It has to because if christianity put truth before dogma it would dissolve itself. Way back in nazi germany far smarter people than you and I came to the conclusion that christiantiy has to go if the germanic peoples are to survive. Do you understand why? I do. It is because christianity is filled with jewish thinking. I could make a long thread how the bible and christianity is filled with fucked up middle eastern greasebag thinking but it would be like (chuckle) preaching to the choir here on Zig Forums. We know and we understand. You do not. You do not belong here nor in an germanic ethnostate because even if your physical shape is that of an european your soul is that of a jew. Enjoy your christian future with your black and brown brothers in faith.

Attached: 3.jpg (690x612 322.59 KB, 179.43K)

Oh gee, I cannot wait for a foreigner from a nation that wasn't only the enemy of mine, but also produces and consumes the most anti good things from ww2 and is also vastly vastly Christian and invested and amiable toward it despite extreme heresy and unchristian genital mutilation.

Kek, he also spoke at Nuremburg about the National Socialists wanting to destroy the Church (it appears he claims this was because the Church was allying itself with enemies of the National Socialist regime - deluded to the very end).
>loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/NT_Vol-XLII.pdf

Its linked in the image lad.
Its almost like you didn't even bother to read it.

And?
Because there's no reason to doubt it in this context and its supported by evidence from elsewhere?
Its not at all surprising that you expect to be spoonfed.
All I did was Jewgle 'cajus fabricius "1940"' - because I saw that he left the NatSoc party in 1940 and the result was forthcoming, 3rd result.
>books.google.com/books?id=RyiCgoA-IYwC&pg=PA60&lpg=PA60&dq=cajus fabricius "1940"&source=bl&ots=xVJO-Gbtuo&sig=77_wsnFhrB05n93Njw2jSM9cKaU&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj7jY6u_OLcAhUFMt8KHZ8pDoYQ6AEwCXoECAcQAQ#v=onepage&q=cajus fabricius "1940"&f=false
To be fair, I wouldn't trust this John Conway character as far as I can throw him in most cases, but I see nothing to suggest falsehood in his statements in this capacity, and it appears his claims are bolstered by Fabricius' testimony at Nuremburg (which it took me awhile to translate out, but it seems pretty clear he acknowledges an uptick in anti-Christian sentiment within the National Socialist party following promotion of 'Positive Christianity', supporting the view that PC was just a ploy to get Christians to support the movement and move away from the Church).

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (331x256, 21.84K)

That's a pitiful response to a powerful post.

It was already suspicious before since the topic is about that book, but you outed yourself as the faggot who was obsessed with trying to alter the context of Positive Christianity in the Christians in Haiti thread.

Thread archive: archive.fo/bTsWh#selection-31633.0-31633.37
Almost verbatim. This is going in someone's cringe compilation.

Second image related but there's plenty more in the archived thread. tl;dr for those who only read tl;dr:
This faggot changes IDs multiple times throughout the thread. He was so stumped on Positive Christianity that he dug up the book he posted in the OP of this thread, looked for a passage to throw blame away from christians, and lied about its context in a dishonest attempt to revise history. Then when no one accepted his lies, he accused everyone of being bots. He has an obsession with bots as seen here:

Before he broke down and resorted to, ''you're all bots!!1" he constantly made it a habit of deliberately and falsely accusing his opposition of things by lying about what they said. Revisionist history fags are the worst.

Attached: revisionist history faggot.png (700x700 90.77 KB, 3.77M)

OP..I am actually really looking forward to reading through your OP and listening to your audio book. This is the reason why I come visit Zig Forums…to learn. It is nice to see someone post something worth considering rather than the shit slides that have become a non-stop onslaught here.

If you really want to learn you should followup with the author's history and who OP really is because even during the reign of NSDAP it became outdated. Read the thread to know more.

I am the author of that text. You are not referencing two different people. Stop acting like a schizophrenic.

Also, did you manage to complete reading that entire sentence?

reposted in case you missed it earlier: the christian idea of salvation through jesus christ alone simultaneously denies the importance of race, sexual dichotomy, intelligence, physical health, aptitude, "virtue morality", and everything else that is not jesus christ/trinity.

care to explain this?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_persecution_of_the_Catholic_Church_in_Germany

On 22 March 1942, the German Bishops issued a pastoral letter on "The Struggle against Christianity and the Church".[69] The letter … accused the Reich Government of "unjust oppression and hated struggle against Christianity and the Church"

I'll give you a hint: logic is older than the jewish bible.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logos

Logos (UK: /ˈloʊɡɒs, ˈlɒɡɒs/, US: /ˈloʊɡoʊs/; Ancient Greek: λόγος, translit. lógos; from λέγω, légō, lit. 'I say') is a term in Western philosophy, psychology, rhetoric, and religion derived from a Greek word variously meaning "ground", "plea", "opinion", "expectation", "word", "speech", "account", "reason", "proportion", and "discourse",[1][2] but it became a technical term in philosophy beginning with Heraclitus (c.  535 – c.  475 BC), who used the term for a principle of order and knowledge.[3] Logos is the logic behind an argument.[4] Logos tries to persuade an audience using logical arguments and supportive evidence. Logos is a persuasive technique often used in writing and rhetoric.

Ancient Greek philosophers used the term in different ways. The sophists used the term to mean discourse; Aristotle applied the term to refer to "reasoned discourse"[5] or "the argument" in the field of rhetoric, and considered it one of the three modes of persuasion alongside ethos and pathos.[6] Stoic philosophers identified the term with the divine animating principle pervading the Universe.

What I'd really like to find is what got the guy in trouble, this "Inner Re-armament" thing that got him tossed in a camp.
Anyone able to find a link to a translation?

Attached: what are you doing.jpeg (600x623, 47.68K)

Why do you post these shitty images; I literally have to hide them because they are so revolting! I hate porn, but these leave me with a visceral feeling of disgust.

To be fair, Jewpedia is a fine source if you go into it knowing its largely controlled by Zionists, meaning you need to pay attention to the sources cited and be wary of statements clearly indicative of author bias.

That's very unChristian of you.

Attached: Christianity - Demographics.png (724x1040 259.98 KB, 106.94K)

I mean yeah, I use it for a large variety of non-political topics.

Revolting. You can't be a follower of christ and a 'christian' at the same time.

I use it for political topics too - its great for identifying your enemies narratives and the flaws therein. I would know so much less about the holohoax being a hoax if it weren't for wikiJews articles and sources cited.

I don't see the appeal in being a follower of Christ to be honest.
All bantz aside, I see Jesus as one of the most Jewish figures in history - he's a subversive rabbi who went about attempting to subvert the Jewish hegemony (his own peoples hegemony) in order to gain himself more personaly power, all the while claiming himself the sole earthly embodiment of the sole divinity in all of existence, as the product of what can only be described as 'divine cuckoldry'.
And whats more, as addressed in a previous post, his ideals were awful, amounted to a fucking anti-materialist death cult, claiming this life was basically just a test to see if you were worthy of the 'real life' in Heaven after you die, which is extremely unappealing to me conceptually… Frankly, the only thing I can see having made Christianity appealing initially was that exact aspect, coupled with all the talk of 'equality before God' and such, which I can totally see appealing to the lowest common denominator, just as we see with progressive-liberals making the same sort of talking points today and appealing to the same dregs.
He reminds me of Martin Luther King in a lot of respects, now that I think of it.

It sounds juicy, and directly contradicts OP's attempt to paint Cajus Fabricius as a neutral observer of Positive Christianity. Even the part as seen in the archived thread, Cajus Fabricius was noticing that other christians were complaining about the rise of heathenism/paganism. Considering that Cajus Fabricius eventually reached the same conclusion a few years after that book came out, Inner Re-armament reiterating that same conclusion, it would be the antithesis to the book OP posted and from the same author.

On top of that, I just want to say, I don't dislike Christians themselves, I can respect that they're trying to carry on what they interpret to be a traditional manner within their tribe… But Christianity itself is poison, and I can't help but look at Christians much the same way I look at cuckservative civnat-espousing GOP supporters in the US: they've tied themselves to a wagon that is slowly sinking into the mud, and they keep telling themselves that this was some sort of mistake and they just need to find a way to get the wagon out of the mud and everything will be fine, but they continually fail to realize that the men driving the wagon, motivated by the words of Jesus Christ, without any maligning of his words, drove that cart into the mud on purpose and keep it there on purpose as well.

I wouldn't necessarily go that far, but I would love to see what the contents represent.
Okay yeah, I can't really argue with that.
The Nuremburg stuff also seems to support that conclusion, that he looked around and realized this was going on and tried to support a reinvigoration of Christendom in NatSoc Germany and internalized the interpretation that the opposition to Christendom in Germany at the time came about as the result of the Church(s) aligning themselves with Communists and the like, and wound up in a concentration camp as a perceived subversive.

Jesus wasn't jewish. Do you really think that 'good fruit' comes from 'bad' trees. The jews declared he wasn't jewish, he declared he wasn't jewish…the romans didn't think he was jewish. Nobody thinks he is jewish except you and the majority of misled christianity.

From an secular point of view, the redemption archetype is incredibly important for civilization to exist in order to build and maintain it as well to become aware one's dark side. To forgive debts, including blood debts and to stop endless cycles of debauchery.

The Heavenly All-Father: Justice
The Son: Redemption
The Spirit: Knowledge

These three gods have been with Whites since recorded history, they're even in Odinism.

to build trust*

>biblehub.com/niv/romans/15.htm

What do you think "For if the Gentiles have shared in the Jews’ spiritual blessings, they owe it to the Jews to share with them their material blessings." means?

Yeah, he was.
That implies you think I think Jesus was 'good fruit', which I don't, as I've already expressed in the very comment to which you were replying.
I don't know how else I'm supposed to interpret your commentary in light of this fact, aside from suggesting you didn't read anything I had to say and are just spewing your cult rhetoric as is so common of your kind.
Proof? Also, I don't actually care, because Jews can't 'declare' someone non-Jewish - and why WOULD they unless he was Jewish to start? That's like a bunch of Whites declaring a nigger non-White, it makes no sense.
Proof? See above.
Proof? See above.

Nah m8, everyone thinks he's Jewish, and so did Hitler.

We already had such insight in our own ideology, there was no need of it from Christianity.

Come on now user, you know you're just going to get some long-winded rant about 'context' and urging you to 'read the whole section' or some other tripe as they always wheel out when it comes down to being faced with promotion of blatantly-undesirable behaviors within Biblical works.

Keep track, Anons. They rotate their topics.

do you think hitler expelling jews from germany was "religious D&C"?

user, there's a religion thread on Zig Forums basically every day.

I'm just keeping aware of patterns. Religious D&C comes and goes in extremely distinct waves, and we've had a lull for a couple weeks. Suddenly multiple imageboards start getting threads about it. I browse halfchan on my phone on the shitter and it's particularly bad over there; I saw a thread in the past 12 hours which was no more articulate than "paganism is dumb" stretched into a paragraph.

Attached: German Church 5.jpg (664x1415 1.93 MB, 497.98K)

Nice, might as well post the scans I have, they are in german, untranslated.

War Jesus Jude?
Artur Dinter 1934

Pages 29 and 30 are missing!

Attached: 5.jpg (1912x3115 215.74 KB, 2.63M)

Attached: 11.jpg (576x800 279.76 KB, 315.94K)

Attached: 16.jpg (491x800 286.13 KB, 285.67K)

Attached: 21.jpg (498x800 285.37 KB, 291.4K)

Attached: 26.jpg (506x800 281.86 KB, 283.36K)

Attached: 31.jpg (496x800 293.94 KB, 281.73K)

Was Jesus a Jew?
Jesus in light of the Racial Question
1934

Attached: 7.jpg (1197x1600 511.7 KB, 422.48K)

Attached: 12.jpg (1200x1600 601.82 KB, 583.82K)

Attached: 17.jpg (1200x1600 608.97 KB, 592.36K)

Attached: 22.jpg (1200x1600 582.95 KB, 588.56K)

Attached: 27.jpg (1200x1600 577.44 KB, 592.53K)

FIN

Attached: 28.jpg (1200x1600, 509.19K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Divinity

In the United States, the degree is generally conferred honoris causa by a church-related college, seminary, or university to recognize the recipient's ministry-orientated accomplishments.[4] For example, Martin Luther King (who received a PhD in systematic theology from Boston University in 1955) subsequently received honorary Doctor of Divinity degrees from the Chicago Theological Seminary (1957), Boston University (1959), Wesleyan College (1964), and Springfield College (1964).[5] Billy Graham (who received honorary Doctor of Divinity degrees from The King's College and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) was regularly addressed as "Dr. Graham", though his highest earned degree was a Bachelor of Arts degree in anthropology from Wheaton College.[6][7]

Under federal law, a 1974 judgement accepted expert opinion that an Honorary Doctor of Divinity is a strictly religious title with no academic standing.

In a 1976 interview with Morley Safer of the TV newsmagazine 60 Minutes, Universal Life Church founder Kirby J. Hensley professed that the church's honorary Doctor of Divinity degree was "…just a little piece of paper. And it ain't worth anything, you know, under God's mighty green Earth—you know what I mean?—as far as value."[10] In 2006, Universal Life Church minister Kevin Andrews advised potential degree recipients not to misrepresent the title as an educational achievement to employers, recommending instead that it would be appropriate to list such credentials "under the heading of Titles, Awards, or Other Achievements" on curricula vitae.[11]

They are wrong (16) but you do like to talk…I have covered this before and I honestly don't really care all that much what other people think (you have already made up you are spewing such ignorant claptrap, and I don't mean that as an insult…it is just the most basic bitch propaganda that glosses over the entire struggle for power that I have come to expect from basically what amounts to a shill trying to obfuscate history with even more shilling [it actually qualifies as worse shilling than the typical jewish shilling]). He was the grandson of Herod via Herod's first wife Dolores, not a jew. This was a struggle between two powerful regent households of Judea for control of the region. Again, just because someone is 'king of the jews' doesn't make him a jew…for the reverse see the 'queen of england' who is a jew foreigner ruling over Brits. Anyway…talking with you is a complete waste of my time because you are too deep in the shill propaganda. B O R I N G!

T. Yawn/REPORTED FOR INTL faggot

another day, another shitty (((christianity))) thread

This is your brain on CI

I have spent years researching and reading on the politics and internal struggles of that era around Rome and dealing the the Jewish international bankers overthrowing of the Roman Empire and by extension Europe.

You are so hopelessly ignorant that you think my research is based in CI; not much else to say about this issue to you.

I'll just leave this here

yeah…

It's the easiest way to filter jews. You fucktards can't resist kvetching about the homeless guy who warned gentiles about your infinite faggotry and cursed you to hell forever.

Attached: Ugly-05.png (450x600, 180.48K)

Yeah, Uncle Adolf was pretty cool.

< Replies
I take it back, you're not a jew. An IQ65 bumblefuck of this caliber is clearly a nigger with some jew ancestry.

German/Dutch mutt btw

at least you admit that rabbi yeshua was a kike
now commit suicide for worshipping a foreskin eating satanic deity

Filtered

keep worshipping molech you satanic faggot

...

T. Yawn/REPORTED FOR INTL

If any of you JEW FAGGOTS answer me, I will filter you.

OP help me out here, do you consider yourself to be a National Socialist Christian? I am listening to the book and considering it. I am on part 1; recording three.

What are the benefits in your mind of having a church tradition if the churches history in Europe has been one of absolute brutality towards the European people (100 million Ethnic Europeans murdered during the Roman States/International banking/Jew/Semitic/Homosexual Occult Theocracy occupation of Europe)? How do you think this has helped Europeans? Is it really just as simple as a eugenics program where these people need to be tortured to death and slaughtered to achieve a certain 'product' (this is a serious question on my part and I feel one worth considering)? We have advanced much from who we were in Roman times and this gives me a pause to consider the ideology of evolutionary pressure (be it artificial) upon the whole nation as opposed to something like the Jew PARASITE ideology that is void of growth, creativity or evolutionary advancement.

I am sort of stuck here, but I am interested in your opinion since this issue seems important to you…It is a bit like looking at a man eating lion and thinking that it would be cool to bring it home with you and keep it around your kids or grandkids because should they become injured (broken arm, sprained ankle) at some point they are fair game for the lion due to inherent weakness.

Attached: hitler quote mein kampf.jpg (850x446, 158.58K)

Understands it all, has to deal with more than just shitposters on an image board because of stuff other than just
lol Dutch/German mutt.

lol

Still doesn’t get it. Lays out weak traps in efforts to fish. Doesn’t find the irony in calling me low intelligence. Has shitposters chasing him across the country.

Has degenerates suggesting I am interested in men. Wearing this shirt because it keeps the demons out of my ass.