So, a study was done, based off of another study from back in 2016/17, that came to some very strange conclusions about the views of Americans - or at least, it seems that way, and I'm hoping someone can help me put together the pieces here.
Here is the study:
>ifstudies.org
And here is the study it was based off:
>electionstudies.org
>electionstudies.org
I can't make sense of some of these numbers.
Other urls found in this thread:
electionstudies.org
twitter.com
My first question comes in with regards to the Discrimination against Whites bit.
The same question applies to the other questions, albeit, they appear to restrict the question to the White population only at least.
THERE'S ALREADY A THREAD FAGGOT
kek
I know it was yours
No, there isn't, faggot, because I deleted it.
Oh, also, do you have anything to fucking offer in terms of content here?
I can't figure this out and there's no much activity tonight it seems.
This is important data, demonstrating massive support on behalf of Whites, and the media is trying desperately to spin this, and you fags are too busy circle-jerking about Q-tier faggotry.
You niggers are really disappointing me here. Its like you don't even want to win.
Until I finish reading this shit, all I can offer is that "alt-right" was an engineered term used to put a target on a nebulous group of people unified on only a few political issues.
Keeping that in mind, any study on "the alt-right" or it's beliefs is inherently flawed.
God damn it user.
This isn't about the fucking Alt-Right, thats just the name of the article, I shouldn't have mentioned it at all.
The point is, this appears to suggest massive support in terms of, ya know, White solidarity and such - and it appears, beyond what you said about innate flaws, that this journo faggot is trying to spin this MASSIVELY… But I want verification that I'm not missing something before I put together a graphic about it.
Here's the racial tally bit btw
You don't seem to understand that the-demography-of-the-alt-right is massively flawed if it attempts to frame itself around (((the alt-right))), which it does.
Those faggots conflated white with (((alt-right))).
>electionstudies.org
Now that's solid data, abet lacking in some aspects.
If the target answered that they were white only, this is their answers.
It's interesting that they didn't ask white mixies the same question.
1190 for niggers
1191 for plainsniggers
1192 for slants
1193 for islanders
Image 1 is white only, image 2 is white+something.
...
Is there data on the rate of homosexuality? My estimate is at least 80%.
I thought as much. Any idea on the 'something'?
>You don't seem to understand that the-demography-of-the-alt-right is massively flawed if it attempts to frame itself around (((the alt-right)))
No, no, user, I get that COMPELTELY. This 'alt-right' crap is just an attempt to group all these people together into an identifiable foe that can be pigeon-holed and subverted.
Its not about them though - the data itself was not about them. There's just some faggot who comes along after and tries to dictate what of their responses defines 'alt-right'.
But in that image, or rather, for that question, that's not present. Hence my confusion.
That next part of what you typed just confuses me further frankly.
I'm not getting into this autistic argument with you again, but no, pretty girls are not porn.
You're low-IQ and you should go back to cuckchan.
This is where the study falls apart.
The "something" in this instance is anyone that is mixed race with white, for example:
White and Hispanic
White and Black
Mixed racial studies that question people are almost non-existent, primarily because the answers are not acceptable.
That was my mistake.
1229-1238 is a series of discrimination questions by race.
These questions are given to all respondents.
If we were to have the raw data broken down per respondent, this would be a valuable study, but it isn't, so it isn't.
Answer one question: Is Zig Forums alt-right?
You’re joking right
Bring in a piece of shit like that?
You know even drunk I would rip him apart
Dicks.
When you’re the fourth horseman and undefeated
The fuck is this? Some bot shit?
Nope. The Alt-Right isn't real.
This is some FBI fourth horseman shit. Someone please take this title from me.
Bot it is then.
Being this good is a fucking curse
I chuckle everytime (((they))) ponder 'where do they come from', as a response was never meant to happen
Answer the following question, and use the site’s quote system to reply: Given any two polyhedra of equal volume, is it always possible to cut the first into finitely many polyhedral pieces that can be reassembled to yield the second?
Go to hell nigger
Yes, and you’re aware I can’t quote you as I am a phone poster.
Oh! An actual potential reply. Why have you abjectly refused to reply or answer questions in the past? Why can’t you figure out how to use the site’s quote system? Why do most of your posts seem completely disjointed and off-topic?
I'm thinking this data may be worth more than a chuckle.
六四天安门事件
1989年天安门广场大屠杀
1989年天安門廣場大屠殺
Just in case
Someone please take this title from me
I am one of the four horseman bro. I can’t be bothered with that shit until I rid myself of this car and can come back to the civilian life.
What the fuck is happening in this thread? Jesus Christ I just wanted some help analyzing a fucking poll and i got nothing but botniggers kvetching at each other.
For the love of God, someone offer some insight that isn't derivative from meth abuse or shitposting.
Stop shitting up threads on this board with your nonsensical bullshit. If you can’t post on topic, don’t post at all. If you can’t figure out how to quote, don’t reply. It’s not that hard to understand.
If the alt-right isn’t real, why do we care about it?
You’re aggravated. Imagine how I feel. Nobody can related as they have no clue what being a horseman means.
Can you make a post on topic?
We don't.
See:
You’re the faggots that got me into this mess
Ah, you are that guy from that other thread.
From reading the docs it seems more a forced conclusion over a hypothesis, than a honest search of answers. (((They))) still are puzzled because the forecasts are not working — because they still are playing the vertical media push. Like… if it was so odd to ask people to stop watching talmudvision or kikebook and really start seeing around and asking questions of why the commoner life is so shit.
That crappy researcher never thought that he would be here forever, because the ride never ends.
Which other thread?
There's not even a semblance of a hypothesis, its more of a direct claim without (apparent) backing on behalf of the faggot in question.
The rest of what you offered here is just kinda vague and nebulous. Do you have anything to offer in terms of the questions I asked above, in terms of the analysis of this data as to derive the origin of these statistical claims?
There’s no sense putting a graphic together about data that will clearly be fabricated regarding a controlled opposition campaign. Why trust ANYTHING they tell you?
Demography of the Alt-Right
I disagree entirely.
I don't have to, others do, and I can utilize that to my advantage. Keep up.
This should constitute spam, and I fucking hate the alt-right you god damned faggot.
Tfw you have Impregnated hundreds of white vaginas across the country
then
The faggot tries to fill the answer from incomplete data. I must be very difficult for them to be incapable of assigning a name to the formless that whispered redpills to the people.
Incorrect - the faggot is trying to CREATE an answer using MANIPULATION OF data.
The answer is already there, and its 'White people don't want to be exterminated', and they're trying to find a way to manifest a face to that sentiment other than just saying 'White people are terrible for not wanting White people to go extinct… Evil racist White people…' because White people won't like that.
Demography of the Alt-Right
jewish… controllled… white nationalism? unironically? Lel? I've seen enough stupid for today. Not that I dont agree with several things.
Yes, yes, that's nice, but this thread isn't about the alt right for fucks sake… I knew I shouldn't have included that buzzword because it'd trigger the spergs…
LOL
I´m sure I just read a thread proposition just like yours in another thread/comment, then 2 threads were made about this 'data'.
The sample data is from a voiced opinion. That means it bears probability of being lies (because there were other people around that might react against such opinions). The main reason of the blanket surveillance and datamining is that user behavior won´t lie compared to all the answers someone could give through words.
Best approach (((they))) can have is by mining these places, like:
Sure, you can read those samples all you want, and make assumptions, or try to grab whatever the second 'researcher' is using to bake the forced answer (remember these people use the verification of 'truth' by authority association), but it will be on unverified data.
Learn how to filter, you faggot
You missed Peterson's Based Jewess waifu. Probably many other things, but you're a sperg so I stopped after the first line. Here's a Jewish pedophile for you.
LMAO
No shit Sherlock
>(((scholars))) have spent the last several years debating whether racism or economic anxiety is the main catalyst for right-wing populism and white racial identity politics.
LMAO
OP. Did you know that social sciences are not real sciences?
Zig Forums is alt right.
It did.
That probably wasn't me.
Well, there was one, I made, and nobody responded to it… So I deleted it and made another with tits in the thumbnail… And here we are.
Yes.
Eh, yes in the case of the FtF interviews, probably not in the online interviews.
Very true.
>Best approach (((they))) can have is by mining these places, like:
I would agree there.
By that standard user, basically all data we ever get is unverified.
And besides, I don't actually care about the quality of the data in that capacity, I care about its use in propaganda, particularly to counter the narratives being levied utilizing said data on behalf of my opposition. Keep up.
Filtering is for pussies m8.
Quite amusing.
Whats funny is the bit you clipped out, wherein they say that increasing marriages won't work, but stabilizing them will, which is a tacit admission that divorce is creating more disillusioned White men.
>>(((scholars))) have spent the last several years debating whether racism or economic anxiety is the main catalyst for right-wing populism and white racial identity politics.
Perhaps on your side.
I verify it on mine. If I can´t I won´t disseminate it.
There is your mistake: you must only use truths.
They are.
Remember their faces when the forecast showed a 92ish% probability of the Clinton hag winning over Trump? Solemn declarations of 'votes can´t be hacked', et al. Then, at the actual election day their faces started to melt, and up to this day they cry about 'the hacked the votes'.
The whole thing is: (((they))) use propaganda with whatever lies or baked truths they manage to pass unverified as long as it can´t be proven. "We", on the other side, use truths (hard digged) that can be neutrally proven. Their propaganda is based on lies. But we just use the truth. Why lie?
Ding. Direct hit.
Now weigh up with the fact Media Matters want to "discredit" everyone that they declare is "alt-right".
'alt-right' is the new 'terrorism'/'extremism' kneejerk word.
PS: think we should rename the term to 'ctrl-alt-right'.
Thoughts?
- J.TrIDr3ESpPJEs
Sample data is unusable for what you want.
(((They))) can´t name what we are (the formless), so believe we are the alt-jew-right (the visible), and try to force the belief of placing a name to gain power over us, to play the 'omg you are racist' to gain censorship. Also, your thread formatting is wrong. But since you will be here forever, it does not matter much.
Y-yes?
So you have no explanation for your behavior, no reason to do it, and no comprehension of what Zig Forums is.
Cute DACAryan, is she from El Salvador or Bolivia?
nope
CANCER
Shows that solidarity is a much better word to use. Identity is a muddied word.
Also shows that the stereotype of Whites being brainwashed is entirely correct, even without the threat of retaliation Whites will still use social filters and virtue signal. No other race on the planet would answer anything remotely like this nonsense, this pathological. It's like Whites brains have been completely hacked.
Career activists don't win, else they would cease to exist once their cause is done. Most of them are lawyers trying to make a buck.
Wat?
No, you don't. You just sound like a retard m8.
That's retarded.
>The whole thing is: (((they))) use propaganda with whatever lies or baked truths they manage to pass unverified as long as it can´t be proven.
That sounds like bullshit user. By your reasoning, a LOT of data that Zig Forums utilizes on a regular basis is not 'truth'.
You're being purposefully obtuse while offering nothing of value in your commentary.
Specifically, you're pretending as though 'truth' isn't somewhat malleable.
Case in point, this study: The fag trying to associate this with the 'alt-right' is lying, he's utilizing manipulation of data to present a false conclusion - but that data IS viable for propaganda purposes, can be presented elseways, and in doing so, it takes on a significant mote of truth, even despite some of the flaws in methodology.
You really haven't contributed anything to this thread whatsoever.
Its not though, or at least, you have failed to in any way meaningfully demonstrate as much.
We are Whites. They just don't want to call us that.
What behavior? Let's see… Oh, so, I've responded to you before, and you've offered nothing to the thread either, just kvetching.
Its almost like someone doesn't want this data to be examined too closely…
Propaganda.
Anytime I've ever heard someone say something like that, the impression I got was that they were not actually from Zig Forums at all. You are no exception.
Identity is trash, and so are identarians.
I don't care how you 'identify', I care about what you are.
Solidarity is, as you say, a much better word, as it espouses acknowledgement of a shared state of being, as opposed to merely a shared identity.
Not completely, but yes, a good portion of the White population has been 'hacked'.
They are behaviorally aberrant.
It's still unnecessary, pathetic and click-bait-tier and you should feel bad for it, you insufferable faggot.
Tattooed women are fucking disgusting.
Wow, we should start using questions like this on anons all the time to verify that they aren't bots. Stupid people aren't welcome, either, generally.
You got triggered by a pic of a pretty girl. Gas yourself or go to boot camp.