Stephen Miller Is an Immigration Hypocrite. I Know Because I’m His Uncle

Stephen Miller Is an Immigration Hypocrite. I Know Because I’m His Uncle.
politico.com/magazine/story/2018/08/13/stephen-miller-is-an-immigration-hypocrite-i-know-because-im-his-uncle-219351

If my nephew’s ideas on immigration had been in force a century ago, our family would have been wiped out.

By DAVID S. GLOSSER | August 13, 2018

Let me tell you a story about Stephen Miller and chain migration.

It begins at the turn of the 20th century, in a dirt-floor shack in the village of Antopol, a shtetl of subsistence farmers in what is now Belarus. Beset by violent anti-Jewish pogroms and forced childhood conscription in the Czar’s army, the patriarch of the shack, Wolf-Leib Glosser, fled a village where his forebears had lived for centuries and took his chances in America.

He set foot on Ellis Island on January 7, 1903, with $8 to his name. Though fluent in Polish, Russian and Yiddish, he understood no English. An elder son, Nathan, soon followed. By street corner peddling and sweatshop toil, Wolf-Leib and Nathan sent enough money home to pay off debts and buy the immediate family’s passage to America in 1906. That group included young Sam Glosser, who with his family settled in the western Pennsylvania city of Johnstown, a booming coal and steel town that was a magnet for other hardworking immigrants. The Glosser family quickly progressed from selling goods from a horse and wagon to owning a haberdashery in Johnstown run by Nathan and Wolf-Leib to a chain of supermarkets and discount department stores run by my grandfather, Sam, and the next generation of Glossers, including my dad, Izzy. It was big enough to be listed on the AMEX stock exchange and employed thousands of people over time. In the span of some 80 years and five decades, this family emerged from poverty in a hostile country to become a prosperous, educated clan of merchants, scholars, professionals, and, most important, American citizens.

What does this classically American tale have to do with Stephen Miller? Well, Izzy Glosser is his maternal grandfather, and Stephen’s mother, Miriam, is my sister.

I have watched with dismay and increasing horror as my nephew, an educated man who is well aware of his heritage, has become the architect of immigration policies that repudiate the very foundation of our family’s life in this country.

I shudder at the thought of what would have become of the Glossers had the same policies Stephen so coolly espouses— the travel ban, the radical decrease in refugees, the separation of children from their parents, and even talk of limiting citizenship for legal immigrants — been in effect when Wolf-Leib made his desperate bid for freedom. The Glossers came to the U.S. just a few years before the fear and prejudice of the “America first” nativists of the day closed U.S. borders to Jewish refugees. Had Wolf-Leib waited, his family likely would have been murdered by the Nazis along with all but seven of the 2,000 Jews who remained in Antopol. I would encourage Stephen to ask himself if the chanting, torch-bearing Nazis of Charlottesville, whose support his boss seems to court so cavalierly, do not envision a similar fate for him.

Like other immigrants, our family’s welcome to the USA was not always a warm one, but we largely had the protection of the law, there was no state-sponsored violence against us, no kidnapping of our male children, and we enjoyed good relations with our neighbors. True, Jews were excluded from many occupations, couldn’t buy homes in some towns, couldn’t join certain organizations or attend certain schools or universities, but life was good. As in past generations, there were hate mongers who regarded the most recent groups of poor immigrants as scum, rapists, gangsters, drunks and terrorists, but largely the Glosser family was left alone to live our lives and build the American dream. Children were born, synagogues founded, and we thrived. This was the miracle of America.

Acting for so long in the theater of right-wing politics, Stephen and Trump may have become numb to the resultant human tragedy and blind to the hypocrisy of their policy decisions. After all, Stephen’s is not the only family with a chain immigration story in the Trump administration. Trump's grandfather is reported to have been a German migrant on the run from military conscription to a new life in the United States, and his mother fled the poverty of rural Scotland for the economic possibilities of New York City. (Trump’s in-laws just became citizens on the strength of his wife’s own citizenship.)

Attached: Stephen Miller.png (1069x1343, 1.79M)

Other urls found in this thread:

israelnationalnews.com/Blogs/Message.aspx/9370
cis.org/Report/Jewish-Stake-Americas-Changing-Demography
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

These facts are important not only for their grim historical irony but because vulnerable people are being hurt. They are real people, not the ghoulish caricatures portrayed by Trump. When confronted by the deaths and suffering of thousands, our senses are overwhelmed, and the victims become statistics rather than people. I meet these statistics one at a time through my volunteer service as a neuropsychologist for the Philadelphia affiliate of HIAS (formerly the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society), the global nonprofit that protects refugees and helped my family more than 100 years ago. I will share the story of one such man I have met in the hopes that my nephew might recognize elements of our shared heritage.

In the early 2000s, Joseph (not his real name) was conscripted at the age of 14 to be a soldier in Eritrea and sent to a remote desert military camp. Officers there discovered a Bible under his pillow which aroused their suspicion that he might belong to a foreign evangelical sect that would claim his loyalty and sap his will to fight. Joseph was actually a member of the state-approved Coptic church but was nonetheless immediately subjected to torture. “They smashed my face into the ground, tied my hands and feet together behind my back, stomped on me, and hung me from a tree by my bonds while they beat me with batons for the others to see.”

Joseph was tortured for 20 consecutive days before being taken to a military prison and crammed into a dark unventilated cell with 36 other men, little food and no proper hygiene. Some died, and in time Joseph was stricken with dysentery. When he was too weak to stand, he was taken to a civilian clinic where he was fed by the medical staff. Upon regaining his strength, he escaped to a nearby road where a sympathetic driver took him north through the night to a camp in Sudan where he joined other refugees. Joseph was on the first leg of a journey that would cover thousands of miles and almost 10 years.

Before Donald Trump had started his political ascent promulgating the false story that Barack Obama was a foreign-born Muslim, while my nephew, Stephen, was famously recovering from the hardships of his high school cafeteria in Santa Monica, Joseph was a child on his own in Sudan in fear of being deported back to Eritrea to face execution for desertion. He worked any job he could get, saved his money and made his way through Sudan. He endured arrest and extortion in Libya. He returned to Sudan, then kept moving to Dubai, Brazil and eventually to a southern border crossing into Texas, where he sought asylum. In all of the countries he traveled through during his ordeal, he was vulnerable, exploited and his status was “illegal.” But in the United States, he had a chance to acquire the protection of a documented immigrant.

Today, at 30, Joseph lives in Pennsylvania and has a wife and child. He is a smart, warm, humble man of great character who is grateful for every day of his freedom and safety. He bears emotional scars from not seeing his parents or siblings since he was 14. He still trembles, cries and struggles for breath when describing his torture, and he bears physical scars as well. He hopes to become a citizen, return to work and make his contribution to America. His story, though unique in its particulars, is by no means unusual. I have met Central Americans fleeing corrupt governments, violence and criminal extortion; a Yemeni woman unable to return to her war-ravaged home country and fearing sexual mutilation if she goes back to her Saudi husband; and an escaped kidnap-bride from central Asia.

Trump wants to make us believe that these desperate migrants are an existential threat to the United States; the most powerful nation in world history and a nation made strong by immigrants. Trump and my nephew both know their immigrant and refugee roots. Yet, they repeat the insults and false accusations of earlier generations against these refugees to make them seem less than human. Trump publicly parades the grieving families of people hurt or killed by migrants, just as the early Nazis dredged up Jewish criminals to frighten and enrage their political base to justify persecution of all Jews. Almost every American family has an immigration story of its own based on flight from war, poverty, famine, persecution, fear or hopelessness. Most of these immigrants became workers, entrepreneurs, scientists and soldiers of America.

Most damning is the administration's evident intent to make policy that specifically disadvantages people based on their ethnicity, country of origin and religion. No matter what opinion is held about immigration, any government that specifically enacts law or policy on that basis must be recognized as a threat to all of us. Laws bereft of justice are the gateway to tyranny. Today others may be the target, but tomorrow it might just as easily be you or me. History will be the judge, but in the meantime the normalization of these policies is rapidly eroding the collective conscience of America. Immigration reform is a complex issue that will require compassion and wisdom to bring the nation to a just solution, but the politicians who have based their political and professional identity on ethnic demonization and exclusion cannot be trusted to do so. As free Americans, and descendants of immigrants and refugees, we have the obligation to exercise our conscience by voting for candidates who will stand up for our highest national values and not succumb to our lowest fears.

Dr. David S. Glosser is a retired neuropsychologist: formerly a member of the Neurology faculties of Boston University School of Medicine and Jefferson Medical College.

Everyone has that one crazy uncle.

Stephen Miller has had the media kikes running scared since his first appearance, when he buttfucked that idiot from CNN who tried quoting poetry at him. Someone at DNC HQ must have sent out a bulletin, because all the late-nights were using the same words to describe him and offering Trump (((friendly advice))) to never put him out in public again.

I have no idea what Miller's background is, but the look on Colbert's face was genuine.

Attached: 1532672966.png (472x568, 279.94K)

Stephen Miller is a good jew.

its worse than that, immigration today is not as strict as it was then. and even the raise act is still not as harsh as immigration then either.

The guy is just an idiot.

According to his uncle he would have killed himself if this was 1941.

No such thing. Temporarily useful jew, at best.

Like only a good jew would.

Lots of (((op eds))) lately.

israelnationalnews.com/Blogs/Message.aspx/9370
Just another jew. Nothing special.

Attached: 7d1f95b6350b8f5cc49e141ad88180d6e460d77c9519d54e21d2ef43f08cc161.jpg (820x820, 40.2K)

I'd pay to watch that time travel movie.

I don't know this guy, but I doubt he advocates genocide. Also,
Just 'cause something (wrong) was done before doesn't make it right now.

Nigger, what?

Attached: Dusty_Obama.jpg (255x400, 25.58K)

What boomer rock have you been living under?

Sounds like they should have been implemented much much sooner then.

What do you mean? Based off of my views of the early 1900s/late-1800s or due to not knowing who this person is? If it's the latter, wouldn't a boomer–who watches TV all day–be more likely to know who he is?

Maybe the beastie boys, r.l. stine, michael landon, and the savage bros.

This is exactly the type of post a boomer would make in response to my post.

Oh, you're just taking the piss.

The only good Jew was Bobby Fischer.

Attached: df0dc94736ffa881efd65920ad9de70583506f8716aa059324130fb4f7513185.png (644x803 45.18 KB, 128.36K)

There was an immigration official on like MSNBC or CNN the other day and the person they were "debating" was yelling at them that if the laws were what Trump wants then so and so couldn't have come here 100 years ago. He just kept replying "ok but those weren't the laws then and they aren't now."

Firstly, jews cannot be hypocrites because that would require them to have moral and ethical standards. This is why "hypocrite" is one of their favorite insults to hurl at the goy.

Secondly, in theory, our immigration policy should not be based on charity or refugee resettlement–this imposition of morality on the law is a violation of 1A. However, we know that the laws of God were not safe from jewish Talmudic subversion, so the ease with which these vengeful rabbis have been able to whittle away at the constitution is not surprising.

Finally, and most importantly, jews make survival of the tribe their highest goal, and their interests may occasionally line up with the interests of the goy, but nothing could be more mistaken than to interpret these occasional moments of agreement as a peace treaty between the jews and the goys. Just like any other parasite, the jew is entirely dependent on a healthy host. A conservative, jewish supremacist tries to convey this to his fellow jewish policy makers in the below paper (quietly released a month after 9/11):

"Will a country in which enormous demographic and cultural change, fueled by unceasing large-scale non-European immigration, remain one in which Jewish life will continue to flourish as nowhere else in the history of the Diaspora? In an America in which people of color form the plurality, as has already happened in California, most with little or no historical experience with or knowledge of Jews, will Jewish sensitivities continue to enjoy extraordinarily high levels of deference and will Jewish interests continue to receive special protection? Does it matter that the majority non-European immigrants have no historical experience of the Holocaust or knowledge of the persecution of Jews over the ages and see Jews only as the most privileged and powerful of white Americans? Is it important that Latinos, who know us almost entirely as employers for the menial low-wage cash services they perform for us (such a blowing the leaves from our lawns in Beverly Hills or doing our laundry in Short Hills), will soon form one quarter of the nation's population? Does it matter that most Latino immigrants have encountered Jews in their formative years principally or only as Christ killers in the context of a religious education in which the changed teachings of Vatican II penetrated barely or not at all? Does it matter that the politics of ethnic succession — colorblind, I recognize — has already resulted in the loss of key Jewish legislators (the brilliant Stephen Solarz of Brooklyn was one of the first of these) and that once Jewish "safe seats" in Congress now are held by Latino representatives?"

cis.org/Report/Jewish-Stake-Americas-Changing-Demography

It really was. We completely shut down Slav and Italian immigration in 1924. We barely took any immigrants from 1924 to 1965.

He wanted white americans to fuck off back to Europe. There are no good jews, only temporarily useful jews.

*was strict

Stephen Miller is an anti-white faggot who deserves the rope. I know because he's a Jew.

In this case, the uncle is pretty par for the course for jewish uncles.

Raise act is an abomination because it gives us "merit based" immigration, which is possibly even worse than what we have. Low IQ shitskins bring a lot of problems, but not as many problems as millions of crafty chinks do. Beaners/niggers/Arabs/etc. don't really have what it takes to fully defeat Whites on their own. They are simply too stupid. Only with help of higher IQ groups like jews, white traitors, and east Asians do the hordes have any chance of beating Whites. So, ultimately, high IQ immigration is much worse for Whites than importing a low IQ slave-caste population, because we are importing a foreign elite that will be more dangerous. We already see how much of a problem Asian SJWs are becoming in the last decade.

America and Germany will always be cautionary tales about what happens when you give Jews an inch.


"High IQ" Pajeets have already taken over certain sectors e.g. Microsoft is on it's way to become a Indian corporation and they've imported enough of them to make fucking commie streetshitters important in local elections.

Hopefully we burgers can do something akin to what germany did in the early 30s,( in the still majority white areas at least) but I dont have much hope. The white population here is almost totally demoralized.

Poor reincarnated Gobbels, at least he made the best of being reincarnated in a den of snakes lel

The ones that are immigrating in large groups aren't the high-IQ ones of their group. The armies of Chinks overrunning Canada and Australia aren't their honor students or scientists. I think it's safe to say that most immigration is low skill, low education. For every pajeet that comes along to be a dermatologist, there are 600 dalits with room temperature IQs.

It is with a perverse awe that I continue to watch the rats consume each other.

Attached: Laid Back.jpg (846x1196, 244.37K)

yeah no

Alt-kikes are already promoting BASED pajeet neocon Nikki Haley to run for president in 2024.


Raise is supposed to target higher performing immigrants. But those will not be coming from Europe, since Europeans have no reason to willingly move to an even more shitty and brown country.

If your family was a bunch of kike back stabbers wouldn't you?

No, Miller is not a 'good jew'. There are no good jews, and that fallacy ought not be repeated - especially on Zig Forums. You should know better; and if you haven't learned better yet, then you best shut your newfag mouth and lurk moar, faggot.
Miller is certainly a useful jew. But he must be regarded with the suspicion and distrust reserved for any other member of the tribe. At the end of the day, no matter how useful he may be, no matter what policy he might support, no matter how many speeches he might make (and they are great), Miller is still a jew. That must not be forgotten.