President Trump calls out social media and corps 'silencing' right-wing

August 18, 2018 | 8:33am
President Trump sent a flurry of tweets Saturday morning criticizing social media sites’ policies toward Republican and conservative voices.

“Social Media is totally discriminating against Republican/Conservative voices. Speaking loudly and clearly for the Trump Administration, we won’t let that happen. They are closing down the opinions of many people on the RIGHT, while at the same time doing nothing to others,”
he wrote at 7:23 a.m.

Trump then took on censorship, focusing on his some of his favorite targets in the media.

“Censorship is a very dangerous thing & absolutely impossible to police. If you are weeding out Fake News, there is nothing so Fake as CNN & MSNBC, & yet I do not ask that their sick behavior be removed. I get used to it and watch with a grain of salt, or don’t watch at all,” he stated.

“Too many voices are being destroyed, some good & some bad, and that cannot be allowed to happen. Who is making the choices, because I can already tell you that too many mistakes are being made. Let everybody participate, good & bad, and we will all just have to figure it out!” Trump concluded.

The president then turned to Russia.

“All of the fools that are so focused on looking only at Russia should start also looking in another direction, China. But in the end, if we are smart, tough and well prepared, we will get along with everyone!” he wrote at 7:46 a.m.

The tweets come after YouTube and other sites yanked Infowars’ Alex Jones from their platforms earlier this month.

archive.fo/yDdrB

Nothing wrong with banning, we nazis would have done the same.

you know Im really going to enjoy impaling you fucking yids along the highway. I was honestly at one point worried I wouldn't have the stomach for it; my high empathy quotient and all; worrying I would hate doing what will be needed to be done to save my volk and not do it effectively. Hell, Im gonna pour some liquid silver and gold down your most prominent kikes throats just so they know that any of there kin that comes after them are going to dig em up and mangle their corpses just to obtain moar sheckles. Chosenites indeed.

Thanks to faggots like you. I am fully dehumanized and ready to face to bloodshed. Hell, I am gleefully eager to begin now. Fuck banning your inhuman words, it's just fuel to the fire as far as I am concerned.

Attached: 1444360361383.png (351x351, 153.07K)

Very kiked first post.
Fuck you.

Advocates of censorship will all have their throats slit, tongues pulled forth, and strangled with them.

Pick that side at your peril.

kek. the only voice that will be permanently silenced is you, kike.

Attached: 2e28ed71ccfce00d6c3f526fe48935d69a8f9b82dbc545d5bf5f4dbfb00b8244.gif (420x236, 1.59M)

lol

It's their site. If you get banned just use another site or make your own.

r u a boomer cuck or a faggot?

Banning people from a small and exclusive board is not the same as government created monopolies banning motherfuckers from all the social media services, in accordance with requests and demands from actual government officials, in treason of their Oaths Of Office, BTW, in an effort to rig the election by controlling the flow of dissenting information

This. Kike shills are out in force, with all of the midterm monet flowing in.

Filtered. Twitter is a public forum and thus is subject to constitutional law. The only groups that would be permanently disenfranchised are those groups like jews and illegals who are not protected under such law.


this.

Attached: 6a98494c00932ababae77b38a5f0eafcc53f5030487b3741ee7e0d1a5614a462.png (884x874, 331.13K)

Please control your spacebar newfriend , you're abusing it

RIP AND TEAR THE SPACEBAR FROM THE KEYBOARD!

You made me genuinely chuckle, so I'll give you the reply you so desperately thirst for. I'm a generous soul like that.

Attached: my fanciest (you).jpg (3840x2160, 1010.92K)

yeah banning people for holding conservative views is the exact same as banning subversive kikes.

fucking moron.

Neither

There isn't much difference between the two. Just that one is bigger.
There are tons of social media sites.
No, you will have to be banned one site at a time.

I am not a kike.

No it's not a public forum. If needed I can explain how the internet works to prove this.

It kind of is.

Hasn't SCOTUS ruled that the first amendment doesn't protect against moral depravity etc? It's the way kikes get around CP laws by saying (((art))) is not morally depraved.
Wouldn't 99% of (((media))) fall under the "morally depraved" descriptor?

Don't even bother. Should the Trump administration or any other decide to file suit, there are certain states where the letter of the law clearly defines internet forums as public forums when operated as such.

California for example has set precedent that determines internet forums as public forums when operated as such (twitter, steam, youtube ect meets the legal definition) and therefore the terms and conditions ie private institution are voided when considering 'viewpoint discrimination'. In one court case, California ruled that IMAX was a public forum and thus couldn't discriminate against some christcuck intelligent design movie.

Attached: viewpoint discrimination commiefornia.png (1217x1589 73.13 KB, 662.06K)

Size is a significant difference.


Call that number and see how many of these social media sites are own just by Gulag.

If you don't understand that these companies are defacto monopolies, you might as well be a kike,

Attached: 1497466791252.jpg (570x587, 43.5K)

20 posts ITT, 18 from a kike derailing the tread and anons taking the bait.
the absolute current state of Zig Forums.

so very Hulagu

Attached: hulagu-khan-leader-quote-i-will-burn-your-city-your-land-your.jpg (800x800, 143.46K)

Your images don't support this.
A website is nothing like a public forum. It doesn't exist in the physical world. People can't actually meet at a website. The internet is a series of tubes. The site is just acting as some sort of middle man. You don't need a middleman, you can actually communicate directly to the people you want to talk to (peer to peer).

>companies
Freudian slip? There are multiple companies, but you think it's a monopoly?

It is paid for by tax dollars. It is our site.

Attached: cali law.png (512x768 74.69 KB, 86.86K)

Welcome, brother!

Yes there is.
GET KILLED BY YOUR OWN POLICE, STATIST NIGGER

Really conserving a lot. Truly redpilled, faggots.

Remember, the term "nazi" is a political insult and, "the jew will control politics".

The jew title:
"Der Nazi-Sozi: Fragen und Antworten fuer den Nationalsozialisten" (1932)
"The Nazi-Sozi: Questions and Answers for National Socialists" (1933)
The actual title of the 1926 publication is:
'Verlag Nationalsozialistischen Briefe'
Published National Socialist Letters
-Dr. Joseph Goebbels

This is the same for the other "nazi" publication:
"Those Damned Nazis"
The actual title is:
Die verfluchten Hakenkreuzler. Etwas zum Nachdenken.
The cursed Hooked-cross. Something to think about.
-Dr. Joseph Goebbels

The word "nazi" never appears in these nor any other of Dr. Goebbels' publications.
They also never called the hakenkreuz a "swastika".

Fair point.

by ban do you mean nationalizing jew owned organizations like twitter and thus subjecting it to federal and constitutional law which already enables the government to censor it's own content against the profane?

Attached: 1517953545933.png (1240x1870, 3.48M)

I can smell the gefilte from here, kike.

The most milquetoast skeptic cuck out there right behind Sargoy. Into the trash it goes you shill

Both.

Attached: 11dd3f20b23f7aaa949fc2f1280203b962731672264e411f9fe77acf41eac737.jpg (260x293, 46.15K)

Yeah, it's going to be a fun few weeks, but look on the bright side, we can use them to educate third parties lurking about just how subversive they are.

Kike shills actually made me more 1488.

Haha, kike.

That case is dependent on California law. Not only that but Kronemyer lost the suit

I didn't claim Goebbels used nazi, only that GLR did.

Attached: a2745627c014282fd0b2cd1972b8ae887288a74c17ba581a01a8eeecd57d69f0.gif (355x412, 1.04M)

No, shit for brains, any company that has over 51% of the market share is subject to anti-trust laws. You can have a cabal of companies that comprise a defacto monopoly by colluding together.

Which, after the the Jones fiasco, we know for a fact that they are in cahoots.

Disinfo kike spotted. When our enemies are so numerous, anyone who would have us turn on allies, is themselves our enemy.

Kill yourself. Slowly.

Attached: fuck it.png (527x409, 20.69K)

wether or not this declaration will be followed by acts is the only thing worth discussing, you fucking mongoloids.
on the other hand
this makes for a shit OP that deserves to be purged

And the award for most blatantly jewish post goes to…

Freedom of speech must be functional.
If freedom of speech is not functional then something has gone horribly wrong.
Whatever legalese and talmudic pilpul you kikes use.
The social media are censoring political speech. The social media are censoring THE PRESS as "the press" at the time of the Founders simply meant "any citizen spreading news in print media." The internet is an extended form of print media. Social media is the new press.
They are censoring free speech, they are censoring political speech, they are tampering in elections, and they are censoring the press (among other things).
There are MANY ways to go after them.
All that is required is some political will.


This.

2 little 2 late

Attached: 4B79028E00000578-5651531-French_first_lady_Brigitte_Macron_center_leans_in_to_grasp_Presi-a-3_1524579102806.jpg (962x641, 62.98K)

Not against freeze peach but Twitter is a private company so that means they can do whatever they want.
Also

...

Until they're regulated like the "private companies" that own utilities, fuckhead.

...

twitter is a public forum as by precedent of some wackjob judge who deemed trump blocking reporters as an infringement on their free speech. They shouldn't be seen as a private company alone, just like a telephone company or a bank shouldn't be, as they are seen as public utilities. The same applies to youtube and facebook, which are already getting sued for this exact reason.

Then why isn't Trump bitching about that instead of complaining about censorship on twatter?

Seriously is Zig Forums reddit now?

I'm not even going to ask.
Secondly would the answer to the freeze peach problem be easy if right retards ban together and make their own Twitter that's superior to it?

We will not ban you, Shlomo. You will be allowed to post right up to the point that the death squads roll up on your apartment. You will get flashbacks of the cossacks running down your ancestors back in the pogroms

Social media is something that sort of becomes "too big to fail" because the success of the platform relies on the number of active users, and it is almost impossible at this point to break through that critical point where it would take off. We need legislation. Luckily, some autistic kike lawyer has already created it for us. Call your representatives and urge them to support this

Attached: DkHNrm4VAAE_YDu.jpeg (1200x1023, 174.04K)

We knew that after daily stormer was forced off the internet

Hello, traitor.

The system needs constant scandals. If any leader gets too popular, people on the edge lose their marbles and start trying to cause communist revolutions via fake nazis.

...

Whenever Trump goes on Twitter to rant about something, whether it's the spic caravan, DACA, the wall, Mueller's BS, or censorship, it means he's not going to do jack shit about it.

tfw next week he announces the launch of Trumpbook and Trumptube

Attached: Unknown.jpeg (207x244, 8.47K)

Truth fears no investigation.

Also kinda pointless to try silence the filth you are going to purge.

But there's only one "Chosen" nation two if you count Worst Korea kikeboos too.

That's the state of the board these days. Good on you for pointing it out. I stay try and teach the newfags something

I immediately know in reading this quote that MSM articles will be published saying "Trump says not to look at Russia" and completely ignoring the words "only" and "also"

Dave Cullen has a non-white girlfriend. I hear he's an anti-racist.

Attached: buzzfeed.png (568x436, 275.51K)

Per instance

Do you have more fancy memes?

Attached: 45ff584cbb353044a7357ba79c473ec74f26d52d37f287cd975e775f702e461c.mp4 (1536x1956 12.54 MB, 655.73K)

Attached: disgust.png (452x586, 71.53K)

Attached: how do you do fellow nazis.jpg (1280x720, 177.39K)

What Trump tweeted (3 tweets to convey the big idea) is essentially that the 1st Amendment, otherwise known as Article 1 of the Bill of Rights is the right and the just law, and whining jews and SJWs should be STFU.

He also - and this is important - signaled that he is going to put some teeth back in the first amendment as law, and bite silicon valley cucks on the ass meanly.

I like the fact that he pointed out that no matter how shitty the MSM treats him, he doesn't want them censored… he has to chose between getting used to it, or simply not going to those sources of opinion and information.

He said "let everybody have their say", and we will all simply have to make judgments about what's said, and think for ourselves.

This is the best news from his administration since he won the election. This is a Yuge victory for anons everywhere (except for the kike shills, who will now frantically bleat that it is all a controlled op)

Me, I'm delighted. May Article 1 of the Bill of Rights cause every jew who is currently trying to make war against our freedom of speech to kill themself.

Attached: delighted anon.jpg (1600x1168, 127.27K)

What Trump says is not at all impotant because he never acts on it. It's just empty talk, like 99% of what Trump says. Until there is a bill sitting in his desk, then he is just impotently whining on twitter as usual.

plus the "think for yourself"
Thinking for one's self is a complete antithesis to the leftist way of how they tyrannically rule over social media platforms. Now we just need pedophilia to be mandated put back on the list of mental illnesses, and for these neon haired deranged leftists

Three. USA, UK, and Israel.

...

Molested as a teen on the right.

I've been there for a long time. It took me quite a while to "see the jew" fully and frankly I'm still studying these creatures and I'm always finding out something new and surprising about them. One should never be presumptuous about such a deadly enemy you know.

Next time, no more comic opera uniforms, no more noisy parades with oompapa bands and waving red banners. Next time, the job gets done in the dead of the night, in utter silence.

Attached: download.jpg (296x170, 8.29K)

I believe it's a mistake to automatically ban kikenvermin, as long as they don't spam. It hones the mind to a razor's edge to engage in verbal war with them here. And without realizing it, they reveal themselves in the naked evil and perversity of their minds. Most edifying really.

Bring it on..

Realistically the Reich deserved the pageantry. It truly was the manifestation of the Universal Order here on Earth.

I do agree that the objective should not have been Lebensraum, but rather extermination of the jewish vermin.

Alex Jones has $55 million
PewdiePie has $45 million

That is what was being reported a year ago. They should get together and form their own platform. Youth market + right wing conspiracy theorists.

They may have deserved it and after the evil Weimar Republic catastrophe maybe they needed a bit of that but at the end of the day it was too much of a beer swilling delusional holiday from reality and not enough shirtless knife fight in a latrine trench with vicious desperate criminals if you see what I mean.

Attached: happy merchant hires.png (4282x5000, 564.3K)

In US law your Constitutionally protected rights are still fully protected anywhere accessible to the public. Physical example: shopping mall. Digital example: online chat.

G-G-G-G-GAASSSS THE KIKES

The guy who shilled Candid and shills adware like Brave. Daily reminder.
Carry on.

Attached: FA288518-647D-425B-80BE-8488C16A97D5.jpeg (252x291, 27.89K)

Should telecommunication companies like ATT ban people for sending text messages or having phone calls they don't like? They are private companies but provide a public service. Imagine if twitter banned minorities for spreading anti white rhetoric? If you don't like something, don't look at it. We shouldn't censor anything speech related if it's personal opinions. Take away the right to say fuck, and you take away the right to say fuck the government. Right now lefties are okay with all of this, but what if a right winger starter banning speech from the left on his platform? Don't you see the hypocrisy?

It's a sign that he's a boomer. Only people who learned to type on typewriters put double spaces at the end of sentences.

boomer D&C doesn't help THEY GOT SCREWED BY (((THEY))) as well so don't play into (((their))) hands
GRAMMAR NIGGER

can't into COMMON GROUND how ABOUT PASSING THE BUCK '''


if you don't know what that last part meant. ask a BOOMER

Im with you user. I'll happily rape Sarah Silverman. That will teach that swine!